More US Stats - Sensor averts rollover danger

Submitted: Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:25
ThreadID: 18523 Views:2363 Replies:3 FollowUps:2
This Thread has been Archived
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/12/07/1102182389361.html

As sales of four-wheel-drives peak in Australia, more manufacturers
are looking at skid-control systems as standard equipment to
prevent deadly rollovers.

Electronic stability control (ESC) uses sensors and a computer to detect if the front or rear of a vehicle is sliding. Typically the computer then activates one brake at the opposite end of the vehicle in an effort to correct the slide.

More and more of the 4WDs sold in America are getting the skid-control systems as standard equipment.

Slides are particularly dangerous with 4WDs - or SUVs - because they have a higher centre of gravity than passenger cars. If they are sliding sideways, that means they are more easily "tripped" by something such as a curb or soft earth, resulting in a rollover. Skid control systems can dramatically reduce the number of single-vehicle accidents, which are generally caused by the driver losing control.

Toyota already has ESC as standard equipment on all its sport utilities in the US, and Honda has announced that by 2006 it will have skid-control as standard on even its least-expensive models. Ford and General Motors are also making the systems available on an increasing number of their sport utilities and utes.

A study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in the US found ESC reduced single-vehicle, fatal accidents by at least 39 per cent and as much as 68 per cent
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Savvas - Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 15:18

Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 15:18
I don't know about others here, but I've never managed to get a sideways slide happening on bitumen in a 4by.

I applaud the addition of dynamic safety features being built into vehicles, however the real issue of driver skill still seems to be overlooked.

Or maybe it's not being overlooked at all and the authorities and manufacturers have simply come to the conclusion that vehicles have to built to compensate for the lower performing drivers.

One thing is certain though. If devices like this become commonplace, then the validity of arguments being put up by the likes of Scruby may start to erode.
AnswerID: 88516

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 16:24

Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 16:24
"I don't know about others here, but I've never managed to get a sideways slide happening on bitumen in a 4by."

You havent tried ;)
0
FollowupID: 347392

Follow Up By: Savvas - Tuesday, Dec 14, 2004 at 13:07

Tuesday, Dec 14, 2004 at 13:07
LOL ... Exactly! You usually have to try pretty hard to get it happening.

Mind you, I slid quite a bit in a straight line once in a downpour when the intention was to go left.
0
FollowupID: 347490

Reply By: floyd - Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 16:53

Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 16:53
I reckon that all Patrol owners should get the new "Truckster Trainers" (not the spill resistant undies that Bruce wears) that are for sale on www.newinventions.com

Basically they are a bit like large training wheels that attach to roof racks and when a sensor feels more than 30 degrees of angle or 250 lbs of lateral inertia shift in the vehicle mass they deploy downwards and make contact with the ground hence averting a rollover.

Apparently ther are not required for Landcruisers or other model toyotas
AnswerID: 88525

Reply By: ianmc - Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 18:20

Monday, Dec 13, 2004 at 18:20
I always thought the nut behind the wheel should control the skid under the wheel LOL!
Its a bit of a worry whether these skid systems would always do the right thing I feel. Putting the brakes on in a skid could be fatal especially when descending a wet track, and surely they could be a negative in a slide. Dont get it, just another
$$$ device to make the 4X4 more unreachable. Next someone will want ground anchors for horses.
AnswerID: 88546

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)