Thursday, Jan 20, 2005 at 09:20
I suppose it the compromise any tire maker has to address.
I ran a set of coopers ATs over the burke&wills development rd and the kennedy development rd and few side tracks and they really chipped.
While a previous set of dunlop adventurers did
cape york and another trip without a chip.
But then the dunlops used to aquaplane real easy on wet bitumen (slid through a r/bout once - scary) when worn, while the coopers didn't.
The coopers advertise the 'best' stopping distances on wet bitimen so the rubber must be a little softer for grip. Only got 60,000 from the coopers but 100,000 from the dunlops.
Just tried a set of toyo opats and they seem to be similar to the coopers, good grip bitumen and dirt tracks, but only 65,000k. Did chip on the strezlecki and
birdsville tracks but not too much and mainly the rear drive wheels.
Ran a set of firestones before that, and they were more like the dunlops. Good wear (90,000) but bit slippery on bitumen when low on tread. Could spin the rear wheels in 1st and 2nd on a diesel pajero with low tread. Useful though by being able to steer on the throttle.
I suppose rubber against stone means the stone wins every time for hardness!
FollowupID:
353006