INOX Test
Submitted: Tuesday, Jan 25, 2005 at 20:03
ThreadID:
19769
Views:
2021
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Jimbo (VIC)
I've got an old 80 amp wet cell DC Batt kicking around that I plan to put in the camper to just run lights (I'm sick of plugging into the car aux batt and the time taken to pack and unpack leads) and just run the fridge from the aux batt in the car.
The old DC generally holds about 12.3 volts after a charge, indicating about 70% charged, so she's not brilliant, but not stuffed. I'm going to see of INOX gives the old girl back some life.
Here's what I plan to do. Give the old DC a solid charge and then let it stand for 12 hours to let it settle and then take a voltage reading. Then I'll connect a thermo cooler I have (which draws a constant 4 amps) for 6 hours, turn it off, let the batt settle again and take another reading.
Then I'll add the INOX and go through the whole process again to see if it makes any difference, by comparing the comparitive readings.
Any suggestions (other than using an hydrometer because I don't have one and reckon the voltage reading will be a "constant" comparison).
Cheers'
Jim.
Reply By: Member - Sand Man (SA) - Tuesday, Jan 25, 2005 at 23:54
Tuesday, Jan 25, 2005 at 23:54
Jimbo,
If the battery was of the sealed type, your idea would have merit for a cheap
method of determining if the battery is still serviceable.
But mate, don't discount the humble hydrometer wherever it can be used.
It is still the best method of testing the individual "health" of cells and they are only a couple of dollars from "anywhere". (Supercheap, Kmart, Repco, etc.)
Eric also makes a valid point (albeit a little sarcastically) re probable sulfation if the battery has been left unused and uncharged for a prolonged period of time.
My charger (3 stage, computer controlled jobbie) actually tests for sulfation and gives it a belt if it is detected, but these are not cheap.
Give the hydrometer some thought Jimbo, it is so simple to use.
AnswerID:
94924
Follow Up By: Eric Experience. - Thursday, Jan 27, 2005 at 23:15
Thursday, Jan 27, 2005 at 23:15
Sand man.
I have been stewing over you comment that my reply to Jimbo was sarcastic, I have re read it and I dont see the problem, could you please explain to me why you said it was sarcastic, I wont to know because I dont want to unpleasant and would like to improve my communication skills. I am not abusing you [I hope] I just want to know. Eric.
FollowupID:
354056
Follow Up By: Muddy 'doe (SA) - Thursday, Jan 27, 2005 at 23:26
Thursday, Jan 27, 2005 at 23:26
Eric, I too thought you were a LITTLE bit sarcastic taking into account the brevity of your first response. Maybe a bit dismissive.
Just the way it reads.
Cheers
Muddy
FollowupID:
354057