Wednesday, Feb 16, 2005 at 00:24
G'day, this is part of a post I made in another thread:
-----------
Perception is more important than reality though, and if you asked 100 people about Nth
Sydney's new rule, they'll say it's to get 4wd's. Sadly, if you ask 100 politions, I reckon you get a similar % saying the same thing. The front page of the Tele said "It's war on 4wd's"
I did some digging on the links you kindly provided. An interesting thing was that in NSL councils own proposal, they have listed the 6 cylinder Commodore's as MEDIUM and the Jeep Grand Cherokee as HIGH. I checked the Green Vehicle Guide and the Jeep (Diesel) has a BETTER rating than the Commodore for greenhouse rating AND fuel consumption.
This illustrates the problem. Even the recommendation shows that the author had a pre-conceived idea that "4WD's" are the problem. So facts in this situation unfortunately counted for very little. The proposal also doesn't identify what the threshholds are so it's difficult to
check on much else.
-------------
If you
check the other threads, there are links to the North
Sydney Council papers and the Green Vehicle Guide. There may have been some merit in the original idea, but the fact that the kind of assumed all 4wd's were worse than commodores and Falcons is a an example of our problem. So in theory Chrispy, you should be OK:-)
Jason.
FollowupID:
357004