Action from Toyota
Submitted: Thursday, Mar 24, 2005 at 17:34
ThreadID:
21494
Views:
2945
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Robsoff
Hi all, I am trying to get Mr Toyota to help me out with my 2003 TD cruiser, it seems that I am a very bad driver!!
I can, at best, get about 16L/100km, Now i have driven this in all manners, in all climates,in all conditions and cannot better that(even coasted down hills!!)
The Toyota info claims an average of 11L/100km depending on a few variables.
I have challenged Mr Toyota to show me how to get that, I will supply the fuel he can show me. I am asking members to please put a quick post under this with your average usage so I have a bit more ammo as i reckon i have a dud.
My rig is a manual, i have removed roof rack and other accessories, I run 285's but even with the stockers it was the same.
Thanks in advance for your help
Reply By: Chucky - Thursday, Mar 24, 2005 at 23:53
Thursday, Mar 24, 2005 at 23:53
I have a 80 series with aftermarket turbo intercooler running 16 psi boost and the worst I have ever got is 16lt/100km. And that was towing 1.1ton of offroad C/T A/C on and I cross the great dividing range 8 times on that trip. I also have roof racks, steel front and rear bars, 265 litre fuel tank and 40 liter
water tank, as
well as being fully loaded for the trip.
With out roof rack, adn 3 blokes for a weekend camping I got 12.5 lt/100km and thats with a small amount (less than 75km) of low range 4wding.
Sounds to me that there is something wrong with your 100 cruiser.
Cheers
AnswerID:
103794
Reply By: fozzy - Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:31
Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:31
robsoff
consumption for first tank or two was araound 12-13l/100km mix of city/country
then added few extras and went to about 14l/100km
worst is about 20l/100km -4 adults loaded up,roofrack with about 2feet of stuff,trailer with 3 m/bikes etc etc
lots of variables ie tyre pressures,285's will make difference also
have u owned from new? if not have any mods been made etc
16l/100km on unloaded car even with heavy foot does sound a bit much
cheers
fozzy 2004 td auto-with a few extras
AnswerID:
104114
Follow Up By: Robsoff - Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 14:09
Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 14:09
Fozzy, I have owned it from new. The economy has never been any good right from the word go, my first drive was from
brisbane down to Gunnedah. On this trip I was running it in so ran very "softly" and throughout the rev range. Sub tank-330km, main-550, this was and still is the best ever economy i have had.
Yes i put an ARB bar on the front, then drove to
Darwin wher i put the winch, spotties etc on but still had horrendous economy the whole time,ran to 25k and then put the 285's on. Even converting back to the rolling diameter it still works out roughly the same. I just calculated my economy for a trip to the
kimberley's and another to Gunnedah and return, some of this was loaded and some empty, basically it works out to between 15.8 and 18.9L/100 for the whole lot
Had the outlaws follow us on the
easter weekend, they kept right on my hammer the whole time and we did 650km, guess what, I was down to my last 1/3 of the main after using my sub first, and they were still on their main!!
Rob
FollowupID:
361623
Reply By: fozzy - Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 14:35
Tuesday, Mar 29, 2005 at 14:35
robsoff
i am running bfg and a/t 285/75/16 for previous figures
definitely looks like you have problem with economy as my figures were with car pretty loaded and im not very light on the pedal-especially overtaking etc and i have roof rack which is atrocious for fiuel economy.also
mine combines off rd and highway use after initial cple tanks.
mate has sahara(t/d auto 2003 i think) and he was getting about 12-13l/100 with rack on and when off round 11l/100km(highway)
had 100 series 98 petrol auto 100k on clock and drove from
adelaide to melb and got 16l/100k standard everything and no gear on board.
think your prob right in saying your car has a problem with fuel consumption
good luck
cheers fozzy
AnswerID:
104141