camper trailers
Submitted: Sunday, Jun 05, 2005 at 18:39
ThreadID:
23605
Views:
3200
Replies:
7
FollowUps:
4
This Thread has been Archived
nebles
Wondering if there is anyone who may have first hand experience with either the Jayco or Coromal type camper trailers.
The type we are looking at are the ones that go up and the beds push out either end. The Coromal type also have a push-out
kitchen, (on the newer types).
Off-road types seem to be stronger and perhaps a better option.
Does anyone have a preference/opinion for either of these two?
On demonstration they both appear quite simple to set-up and would maybe give better fuel economy as they reduce down to a virtual trailer for towing.
Interested to know about good/bad stories!
Thanks,
Alison
Reply By: pmacks - Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:37
Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:37
Hi Skinny,
this is my experience only and iam sure others will disagree maybe.
When touring the out back say the
plenty highway we run 25-30 psi on the trailer across the simpson the trailer was down to 18-20 psi and
cape york around the 25-30 psi again on the road we run 38psi but it does depend on the conditions at the time. We were at cape palmeston up near
Sarina once and the sand was so soft in one place we were running 10psi but as a rule on dirt roads its 25-30psi and in sand 18-20 psi.
This works for us anyway. OH and drive to the conditions :)
pmacks
AnswerID:
114515
Reply By: Member - Duncs - Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 16:07
Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 16:07
I woud say that Pmack is pretty right. But qould suggest you shell the extra bucks for the Off road version. The frame is that much stronger and that is worth having.
I had a neighbour who towed an off road Jayco all over the place, he even modified it to get extra gear (and weight) in it. I alos travelled with a friend towing a standard Jayco from
Bourke to
Wentworth along the Darling and it was very second hand when he got it
home. We also spent a bit of time doing running repairs along the way.
It was not an issue of going too fast either. I spent more time waiting for him than you could imagine. It is worht the effort to choose
well the first time.
Duncs
AnswerID:
114595
Follow Up By: Member - Duncs - Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 16:08
Monday, Jun 06, 2005 at 16:08
Please forgive the spelling. It is more an issue of typing accuracy, I'll try to do better in the future.
FollowupID:
370462
Reply By: gone bush - Wednesday, Jun 08, 2005 at 20:40
Wednesday, Jun 08, 2005 at 20:40
we bought a 1997 coromal camper 4 years ago, we are pleased with it and it hasn't given us any major problems, the only thing in that time was the winch and cables just needed tightening, hubby did it qite easy with the help from this
forum.
I would guess that ours wouldn't be quite as fuel freindly as the Jayco as it's quite a bit higher and heavier than the Jayco's of the same age, (not sure about the difference in the new ones). We do feel though that it is quite a bit stronger than the others. good luck with it all.
AnswerID:
114954
Reply By: Member - Kingsley N (SA) - Wednesday, Jun 08, 2005 at 23:07
Wednesday, Jun 08, 2005 at 23:07
We have had a Coromal Pioneer Silhouette 3.9 for about three months now. We ordered it brand new after checking out the lot at various caravan shows. We are very pleased with it. We have just done a trip
Adelaide to
Birdsville,
Innamincka, Camerons Corner
Tibooburra. Some of the roads were very rough and there was plenty of dust. We get only a fine film of dust inside. I saw a Goldstream at Mungeranie that had buckets full of dust inside after 300-400 KM.
Advantages of the Coromal are
1. Good strong chassis
2. Heaps of extra space due to the push out
kitchen
3. Bench height is normal van height (Jaycos are a good 50mm lower at the benches)
4. Streamlined fibreglass shape good for towing and sheds water readily. Attractive and draws positive comments from all who inspect it.
5. Full size door replaces the travelling door (which converts to an outside
table)
Some negative points on the Coromal.
1. Quite heavy draw bar weight (100KG+). Loading junk into the front boot makes it even heavier.
2. Poorly assembled
water tank had a broken drain plug and we lost water on the first trip
3. Poorly fitted step cum inspection cover near the larger bed. It broke away on the first trip.
4. Had to wait two weeks to get the dealer to attend to problems.
AnswerID:
114980
Follow Up By: nebles - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 19:02
Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 19:02
Hi Kingsley N
Very interested in your comments.
We have since purchased a Coromal Silhouette 391 (Pioneer) and we are very impressed with it.
Only been away once so far, just to (play) and leaving end of June for
Shark Bay.
I agree with your point 3. under negatives, yes the step is not strong at all and we shall not be using it to store anything because once you lift it up it does not want to sit back. The unit we purchased was 12 months old so a 2004 model and hardly used, but had I purchased it new I would have had it back to the dealer definately. We shall double
check the
water tank drain plug. Thanks for that.
Eventually we want to travel across to
Melbourne and put the vehicle, camper trailer, us and our little maltese on the ferry and do Tasmania. Will wait for the warmer weather to come for that.
I agree with your positives. Alison
FollowupID:
371913
Follow Up By: Wombat - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:00
Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:00
Whooo hoo. That makes three Silhouettes on ExplorOz. Tasmania 2006 here we come.
FollowupID:
372014