100 series cruisers

Submitted: Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:09
ThreadID: 25390 Views:3229 Replies:7 FollowUps:23
This Thread has been Archived
G`day Ladies and Gentlemans; Have a mate looking for information on which would be the better option between the V8 petrol and the turbo diesel, both would be coupled to an automatic box.His application would be mainly comutting with a few trips each year. Many thanks
Keep wandering
Regards Bob
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Steve - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:17

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:17
trips? up and down the coast on the blacktop? Thru the centre where it can be 400ks+ between fill ups? If the first, go for petrol and get lpg put on. Relatively simple and cheap $2300 on a Cruiser (recently had it done and it's paid nearly half back within 5 months) if the second go for diesel.
AnswerID: 124050

Follow Up By: Exploder - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:04

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:04
I would like to think that the V8 would be able to get more than 400k’s out of those big cruiser fuel tanks. What sort of consumption does the V8 get anyway?
0
FollowupID: 379021

Follow Up By: Steve - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 14:08

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 14:08
I got 500ks per 90L on petrol and 450 per 90L on lpg. Mine's the 6cyl 100 series. I believe the V8 uses slightly more. What I was referring to, was with a dual fuel setup, if you're out in the back-blocks with no lpg around and heavy going, you'd get much less than 450ks on 4x4 mode. That being the case you'd make sure you had both tanks filled and you'd have to use the petrol first to make room for a top up. If you use your gas first and there's no gas to replace it, you'd have 90L to get to the next fuel supply (on a long stretch). If the track is heavy going and/or you're towing, you're pushing your luck. Jerry cans nothwithstanding. 99/100 you'd be OK, but you'd need to keep an eye on the guage with dual fuel, depending of course, on remoteness/supply.
0
FollowupID: 379028

Follow Up By: Steve - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 14:13

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 14:13
those fuel consumption figs are my average day to day. You'd get better on a run.
0
FollowupID: 379029

Follow Up By: RAGS AND DAGS - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:14

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:14
Sorry to dissapoint but the V8 is a more efficient motor by about 5%.
0
FollowupID: 379180

Follow Up By: Steve - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:51

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:51
suppose it depends on which report you read. Speeds/conditions etc. Not disappointed with my lpg.
0
FollowupID: 379184

Reply By: Phil P - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:02

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:02
Unfortunately Toyota charge a HUGE premium for their Turbo Diesel motor over their V8. Coupled with 5000Klm service intervals it takes many years of driving to recoup the extra $ spent buying the diesel version.

For the type of driving you have mentioned I would go with the V8.
AnswerID: 124055

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 20:23

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 20:23
Are you sure the TD has 5k service intervals? certainly with the 79 series utes and troopys both the perol and diesal have the same 10k service intervals with additional (both) 5k service intervals for severe conditions
0
FollowupID: 379049

Follow Up By: Stew53 - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:23

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:23
The service manual for the TD100 and V8 have a list of severe conditions and states that if you only operate under these conditions occasionally then you need only perform maintenance every 10,000km or 6 months.
The manual states that the FZJ78/79, HZJ78/79/105, HDJ78/79 is to use 5000km or 3 months intervals regardless of operating conditions.

Not necessarily my views
Stew
0
FollowupID: 379062

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:12

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:12
nuh wrong it says nothing of the sort. the only thing you need to do if you have a 78 79 is to lubricate the steering linkages every 5k oil changes rmain at 10k unless severe operating conditions. 105s have the same service scehdule as every other station wagon
0
FollowupID: 379087

Follow Up By: Stew53 - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 07:40

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 07:40
Only quoting what's in my manual page 29 book part no. TSO0315, issue 0402-03 quote word for word

“FZJ78/79, HZJ78/79/105, HDJ78/79 Models
Use 5000km or 3 months intervals, and the corresponding “Service” voucher in this booklet,
regardless of operating conditions. “

On page 39 in the table for service times for NORMAL operating conditions there is no service time for the 5000km service against the UZJ100 i.e. V8 or the HDJ100 i.e. Turbo Diesel, and a recommended service time of 0.4hr for the FZJ78/79, HZJ78/79/105, HDJ78/79.

Toyota may have conflicting recommendations in different booklets, I will check out a 78/79 booklet tomorrow.
Stew
0
FollowupID: 379091

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 19:20

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 19:20
Stew is correct.

5k intervals for 78/79 series irrespective of conditions - yep Page 29 says it all.

Having said that my oil is relatively clean after 5k on the 1HD-FTE.

Cheers
Phil
0
FollowupID: 379123

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 20:17

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 20:17
Yes.4 of an hour and the 5k interim service as noted in the service manuel is to lubricate the steering knuckle drag link. NOT oil change (that is on the back for severe operating conditions) Also if you look on your air cleaner it also states there oil changes at 10k
0
FollowupID: 379129

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 22:38

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 22:38
Davoe,

What you say is correct if you only look at the servicing slips. But the servicing slips cover the 100series as well, which has a 10k oil chnage interval. I think Toyota assume that we treat farm trucks hard and pamper the 100series TDs.

But page 29 of the manual says all the farm trucks and troopies are 5k for oil changes. Just know what I'm reading.

I too believe this is a bit of overkill, so I change mine somewhere between 5 and 7k usually. All depends on when the next trip is happening.

Cheers
phil
0
FollowupID: 379147

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:11

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:11
I have the service book in front of me and on page 29 it states the ifs 100s need only have the 10k services unless used in severe operating conditions. it also states the RFS vehicles need servicing every 5k which is consistent with the service slips which page 29 specifically refers to, which have for every 5k to lubricate the steering knuckles and drag links. No where does it say to change the oil every 5 for normal operating conditions. Not on page 33 where it is only a (R) instead of an R (bold), not on the service slips, Not on the sticker on the air cleaner, it just doesnt say it anywhere. When waiting for boggers to finish bogging headings I often get these books out for times such as this and it just isnt in there no matter how many times I read it
0
FollowupID: 379155

Follow Up By: RAGS AND DAGS - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:53

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:53
Totally correct .

Arduos driving conditions only for 5,000km servicing in T/D 100 series
0
FollowupID: 379185

Follow Up By: Stew53 - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 19:48

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 19:48
Davoe
I stand corrected, it makes sence when you read the service record slip, yes lubricate the steering linkages every 5K in normal operation for the 70 series and 105 only, for normal operation engine oil and filter change etc. change at 10K same as V8 &T/D.
Stew
0
FollowupID: 379246

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:30

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:30
Davoe,

Had another look, and I stand corrected.

Both Stew and I were caught by their ambiguous statement on page 29.

Yep its a funny way to say that the drag links need to be greased every 5k on the 78/79series!!!!!!

Thanks
Phil
0
FollowupID: 379324

Reply By: at4x4 - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:29

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:29
Landmark in Bourke have gone to V8 cruisers, after having TD's, and cheaper to run, faster top speed, and no front A arms cracking.

The cover 6-800km a day, buying, selling, and taking customers to look at stock.

A customer also has stations outback, and his last 3 week trip around them saw him average 130kph between el questro, and Bourke, on one of his normal 3-4 week trips across properties.

Might be interested to know they also tried nissan patrols, and they were all back to thier own cars within 8 weeks, due to failures, waiting for parts, chassis and body cracks, and a deal with Ford on exploders saw them after 3 suspension chnages per car in 3 months, be pensioned off, and go back to 100 cruisers also.

Also have some interesting details reagrding tyres from these people as well, but thats for another thread ;-)
AnswerID: 124125

Follow Up By: warthog - Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:54

Saturday, Aug 06, 2005 at 21:54
"faster top speed". What 170 kmh+ not enough in the turbo 100 series.
0
FollowupID: 379071

Follow Up By: at4x4 - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:44

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:44
nope,

nor is the amount of time the td takes to get back up there time after time, as you slow for other traffic, cattle grids, wash aways etc etc.
0
FollowupID: 379096

Follow Up By: warthog - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 22:14

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 22:14
Perhaps you're in the market for a buggy similar to that the finke racers use. With 3 ft of senpension travel you can hit the grids at 240kmh...
I'm pretty sure they run on pulp too.
0
FollowupID: 379146

Follow Up By: at4x4 - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:18

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:18
warthog, you may of read the thread incorrectly, but I dont need anything , as I dont work at the above mentioned place, Im only going by what they have passed on about the vehicles they use, regardless, they are the ones living with it, and in the driver seat, so if they dont think the TD is as good to drive, and costs more to run, when they sit in them 6-8 hrs a day, then I guess they are allowed to say so, wether you wish to hear it or not.

My own current truck takes the grids at 140kph +, which is enough for me loaded.... for now.
0
FollowupID: 379164

Reply By: Member - Russell S - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:42

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:42
For me, the decision is not one of economics, but performance. I want that area of performance that only the T/D delivers, crawling up and down rocky hills etc, so I bought diesel. If all he's doing is driving around roads with a little bit of off road, the V8 would be fine, and a lot cheaper. The LPG option is also good - put the tyre on the back, and you end up with a big gas tank and your original 90 litre petrol tank. I agree with the outback point made above - LPG isn't very available in remote areas. Petrol consumption increases much more quickly in the rough stuff than diesel too. Either would be OK by the sound of it - at least he's got the brand right..... :-)
AnswerID: 124162

Reply By: OMN - Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 20:54

Sunday, Aug 07, 2005 at 20:54
I went through exactly the same questions July last year as to whether to ge tthe diesel or the petrol V8.

I ended up with the V8 for the following reasons,
- car was significantly cheaper than the diesel
- diesel is 10c a litre more expensive approx in Melbourne
- most driving was goign to be on normal roads from home to work
- cost of service intervals on the diesel compared to petrol
- actualy did a spreadsheet of estimated kilometres and worked out it would take almost ten years to get the cost of the extra money for the diesel back
- i enjoy the extra pickup that the petrol has
- has 145 litres of fuel and gets about 700kms in mainly city driving
- i get further on highway by about extra 100+ kms
- car is great, works very well on road and handles the offraod stuff pretty well too
- been high country Vic a few times
- been to Robe

All went great.

Mark
AnswerID: 124217

Follow Up By: Flamelily - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:11

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:11
Mark

I concur. I have a V8 Sahara. The Auto box is the best feature. I use it as a semi-manual. It is really good for towing. I have owned Nissan Ti (2), GXL 100 Series (6cyl) and now the Sahara. I have "placed" my order for the new 130 when it arrives 2007 / 2008. I "run" all my vehicles in and normally do the same drive. The GXL did 21 l/100km whilst the Sahara did 14.9 l/100km. Cannot get over the fuel efficiency of the V8!!!!

I belong the Toyota Landcrusier Club (TLCC) in NSW, and to gain membership you have to complete their driver training courses. The Sahara passed with all lights flashing and gizmos working. 30 l/100km. Using standard Dunlop AT22 and no suspesion modes, to put it mildly, I am so amazed when compared to the other vehicles.

Cheers

Ian
0
FollowupID: 379174

Follow Up By: RAGS AND DAGS - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:56

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:56
Yes Mark but you try and sell a v8 cruiser second hand with the other 10,000 on the market at the same time.

T/D is the resale king !!
0
FollowupID: 379186

Reply By: Phil P - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:24

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:24
This is the official word from Toyota regarding the "old" Prado - I can't find the email regarding the 100 Series,but it was similar.

Dear Mr XXXX,
Thank you for contacting Toyota and allowing us to respond.

The service intervals for current and previous Prado models as follows, Diesel, replace engine oil every 3 months or 5,000kms, oil filter every 10,000kms which ever comes first under normal operating conditions.
Petrol, replace engine oil & filter every 6 months or 10,000kms which ever comes first under normal operating conditions.

Fuel consumption for current Prado as follows, Petrol 3RZ 2.7ltr A/T 13.1 3RZ 2.7ltr M/T 12.5 1RG 4.0ltr A/T 13.8ltr 1RH 4.0ltr M/T 13.8ltr Turbo Diesel 1KZ 3.0ltr M/T 11.4ltr 1KZ 3.0ltr A/T 12.6ltr all per 100kms tested to Euro type ADR 81/01 test standard.

Previous model consumption tests not available as there was no requirement for vehicles over 2.7 tonne GVM.
Overlander magazine performed consumption tests which are available at www.overlander magazine.com.au Hope this is of assistance.

Regards,

Ian Chenney
Customer Relations Adviser
Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited

AnswerID: 124237

Follow Up By: RAGS AND DAGS - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:58

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:58
It may be so for the Prado but certainly not for the 100 series.
0
FollowupID: 379187

Reply By: OMN - Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 18:27

Monday, Aug 08, 2005 at 18:27
You may be correct on the resale value, but as the car starts off $10k cheaper it ought to get more at resale.

Secondly i was also able to secure a price that was quite good at purchase time as well which i couldnt get on the diesel, yes you may say thats for various reasons.

Lastly i dont have the dollars or energy to build up more than one vehicle to the type of capabel tourer i am goign to turn this into over the coming years, and tus plan to keep the vehicle for a good ten years probably.

By the time i get aroudn to selling it i intend to have taken it an awful long way through an awful lot of stuff and if it has much value left by then good luck to me.

Next day car will be back to a sedan but i will keep the cruiser for weekend and offraod work once it comes out of lease in a few years.
AnswerID: 124328

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)