Mitsubishi Pajero feedback

Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 20:37
ThreadID: 25473 Views:6269 Replies:7 FollowUps:2
This Thread has been Archived
Hi,
Chasing some feed back on the Mitsubishi Pajero around 96' to 01 models.
How do they handle, reliability of the vechile. I would love some feed back.

Cheers Clinton
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: RustyHelen - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 20:45

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 20:45
Hi Clinton
We have a 2000 NM from new. Can't talk too much about reliability as have only done just over 93k in 5 years but the car is great.
Have had no issues in that time, beyond the manufacturer recalls (make sure they have been done).
Same issues as all Paj's for tripping. Suspension is soft (we had OME upgrade done) and poor fuel range due to smallish (80 litres useable) tank. We have also had an aux tank fitted.
Have you had a look on www.pajero.com.au ?? I am sure a query there would get lots of responses.
Rusty
AnswerID: 124502

Follow Up By: RustyHelen - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 20:46

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 20:46
That should be www.pajeroclub.com.au
Rusty
0
FollowupID: 379396

Reply By: 120scruiser - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:03

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:03
Gday Cliffy
The only dramas we have in our workshop are mainly minor.
The 4wd indicator lights on dash can have problems. Only globes but dismantle dash to get to them.
Oil leaks from cam caps at back of heads. O rings are only $4.80 each and 2 bolts to get it out.
If water pumps leak, lots and lots of labour on 3.5 litre engines. It is crucial for timing belts to be replaced at 100 000 km service. Major engine damage will occur if they fail.
Gearbox's to get if clutch needs replacing are an absolute B%&ch. Some how they just don't fit.
Ultimately they are pretty good.
AnswerID: 124508

Reply By: DCTHS - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:24

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:24
Hi Clinton, we have just traded up to our 3rd Paj. Our 1st was the old NG (first with bonnet scoop) and was simply brilliant. That vehicle had covered many a mile in the northern SA 4WD country (Simpson etc) and was a marvellous truck. Our second was a 97 NL again with the 2.5 ITD (again with bonnet scoop) and for the most part had been a very solid and reliable vehicle. Did everything the earlier model did only a little quicker and smoother.
We unfortunately did have some problems in later years thanks to a load of dirty fuel taken from a local fuel station. My service dealer undertook fixes but avoided repairing the fuel pump. We had new glow plugs, injectors on a couple of occasions until recently when I took the vehicle to fuel injection service. Three thousand bills later the car was back to a gem.
We decided that a smart looking 2003 version parked in the dealers yard took our liking and figured that with new tyres, brakes and a couple of smaller items it was time for an upgrade (thank you bank!). Our new vehicle this time is essentially the same although we now are up to the GLS version and this truck is automatic trans.
Clinton we had no qualms about the selection of another Paj, we have had a very good run overall, this last year has seen us as take on an agency for Deluxe Camper Trailers and so we have undertaken a great deal of movement of trailers and our trucks have done so faultlessly. The only thing with the new truck is that I will shortly have the rear suspension upgraded as I think it is a little soft for the camper trailers.
Good luck and bring on the Paj!
AnswerID: 124519

Follow Up By: GEG - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 22:18

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 22:18
I have recently bought a 2001 pajero. (March 05) I love it.

It has so much room. Just as much as my friends cruiser 100 series, although she reackons hers has more room. ok so it fits 8 and the paj only 7. Another friend just bought the new grande prado, its lovely but, the Pajero has more room! and no annoying seats hooked up on the back rear windows.

While Im female and no nothing about the motor, I do know that it drives well, can pass other cars when I need it to. Is not too bad on fuel, (usually about $60 a fortnight), I travel 20 min to work and back each day, and where ever on the weekend. I so enjoy that little boot area, its a cavity where the 3rd row of seats would usually occupy when not in use...I keep the folding chairs there, a small table, torch, the togs and towells bag, and a few books etc. I have the GLS, and it doesnt have the leather, nor the rear vents for the air, but there is air vents that fire into the back seat area on the floor and they work ok. I love the compas and its detailed outdoor temps screen that sit on the dash etc., but I just wish that my sunvisor had a makeup mirror. The passenger side has and ive noticed most 2001 NM's do.

I traded in a brand new ti xtrail for this car and while the xtrail drove well, this is not much different.

I have taken the vehicle off road, heaps of times and it handles all very well. I think my friends land cruiser is a better off roader, and I feel that the pajero may lack a bit of ground clearance...but its good enough and what the heck, unless you live in the outback or on some sand island, you will need the car for on road duty more than when you need it off road, so a little bit of a compromise is fine.

I think I would prefer a larger fuel tank, especially on big trips, but I get paid fortnightly so I fuel up each pay day, at the end of the day, I rather a 60 dollar fuel up than a $120 purchase.

good luck,
Look for a model that has at least a 2 year warranty.
0
FollowupID: 379435

Reply By: Elsewhere9 - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:42

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 21:42
Hi Clinton,

I have a 95 NJ 2.8TD with 142K on the clock and no problems so far. Just did 4 weeks to the centre with camper trailer in tow (9K km) and it ran like a dream. I agree that the rear suspension is a bit soft for a camper trailer. We also have the Paj loaded up with 2 children and gear. Upgraded the springs with 2" lift some time ago.

The only problem off road is they tend to lift a front wheel due to the limited suspension travel of the IFS.

All in all, I would buy another one, but this one has to last another few years yet.

Good luck with your search.

Cheers,
Greg

AnswerID: 124523

Reply By: MikeyS - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 22:14

Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 22:14
Clinton
I have a 95 NJ 3.5 litre with 143k on the clock. Not much difference between the 95 and 96+ models. The Paj hasn't missed a beat for the 90k I have driven. The only problem I have had was a buggered bearing in a belt idler pulley on a trip at Cape York, which was a 5 minute job to replace. But that might have had something to do with blasting through a muddy creek crossing at a speed like we were making a 4wd commercial, so I operator error for that one.
Handles much more like a car than most. As said above, a suspension upgrade makes a big difference if you're going to load up heavily.
I'll be getting another Paj, but only when I can bear to part with my current one.
MikeyS
AnswerID: 124529

Reply By: Scubaroo - Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:48

Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:48
The 3rd gen Pajero was released around 04/2000, which is the NM - almost identical appearance to the current NP model. We have the NM Exceed with 3.5L V6 auto which we bought about 2 months ago, but for about the same money you can buy a later "poverty pack" GLX 3.2L Di-D auto now (there's actually one on eBay at the moment <$30k). The V6 auto sees us getting 13.9-16.4L/100km, but a lot of people are reporting <10L/100km with the Di-D, even as low as 8, which makes them very fuel efficient.

The only downside is the 90L fuel capacity (compared to Prado at around 180L), so our highway range is about 600km, but there are various replacement or auxilary tanks available to increase the capacity. If you want a long range tourer, the Di-D is the beastie to get. We bought ours knowing that it would never tackle one of the -long- outback runs between fills, but still plan on getting a 60L auxilary fitted which will see us get maybe 1000km at a stretch on highway, and a decent offroad range - more than sufficient for our anticipated usage. Currently experimenting with PULP etc to improve economy. Not sure if the Long Ranger auxilary tank fits the GLX though, but there's no reason you couldn't get 1800km highway range with a Di-D.
AnswerID: 124577

Reply By: cliffy1 - Thursday, Aug 11, 2005 at 18:27

Thursday, Aug 11, 2005 at 18:27
Thankyou for everyones reply's on this subject

Cheers Clinton
AnswerID: 124817

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)