cargo barriers
Submitted: Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:43
ThreadID:
25535
Views:
5355
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
13
This Thread has been Archived
bware
Hi all, just a few thoughts regarding this safety item; why do we get fined for not wearing a
seat-belt but cargo barriers are 'just an accessory'. Is there a push by motoring groups (NRMA etc) to make them mandatory? Why the emphasis on 4wds? Isn't my wife's 4 cylinder hatch which does the shopping every week in more need of one than our 80 series which is empty unless we're travelling? (That doesn't mean that I think we don't need one in the 'cruiser)
Other than that, every other day I fold the rear
seat forward for practical purposes on our property, is there some sort of quick release system to install? While I'm here, excuse my ignorance, but what do all the LOL, LMAO etc mean? Do you members get some special code book? Is it just common jargon on the internet that I haven't caught up on (I am 40 odd!)?
Cheers
Brian
Reply By: Willem - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:21
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:21
Brian
I doubt whether you could make it mandatory for 4x4's to have Cargo barriers as most vehicles are multi-purpose in their design. We bought a Commodore once which had a cargo barrier fitted and it was a pain as it prevented one from loading items of length into the wagon
For internet jargon go to the Abbreviations button at bottom of page where all will be revealed
By the way, being 40 odd makes you a youngster on this
forum....hahahahaha
AnswerID:
124872
Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:31
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:31
Brian,
I also think that cargo barriers should be mandatory in all station wagons. Ford and Holden have gone as far as having the captive nuts built into there station wagons for the barriers, but it is up to the owner to purchase one.
Some large company's like Telstra have them as part of there OH&S.
Great Divide Tours strongly recommends that vehicles joining us on the longer trips have a cargo barrier be fitted.
In most vehicles a barrier can be fitted just behind the front seats and also have the fittings supplied and fitted for the fitting of the barrier behind the second row of seats. The barrier can be moved to either position or removed by undoing 4 bolts.
In the case of a roll over the barrier will help keep the roof of the vehicle from collapsing,and I have seen this happen.
Wayne
AnswerID:
124882
Follow Up By: Member - Tonester (VIC) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:48
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:48
Could be wrong, but I think the guy who invented the milford cargo barrier is an ex-Telstra employee. They had amazing number of deaths by lethal cargo projectiles, until this bloke came up with a way to stop it.
FollowupID:
379754
Reply By: G-wizz - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:48
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:48
My cruiser came with a cargo barrier but it was such a PITA that I permanently removed it. Seatbelts probably save lives in a large percentage of serious accidents but barriers* probably only prevent a tiny proportion of injuries.
* I've never seen any actual statistics on this issue.
internet slang
AnswerID:
124885
Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 00:08
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 00:08
G-wizz
Considering that a full tissue box or street directory hitting you in the back of the head at 60kmh will potentially kill you - hands up all those that want to be hit by the tool box?
As a Paramedic I reckon cargo barriers should be a mandatory fitment in all wagon/hatch style vehicles. I wouldn't put my family in the front without one.
Most can be moved to forward positions for when the back
seat is folded down and it doesn't take long.
I've had wagons for the last 7 years and have only found one thing I had to do which needed the barrier out. Two minutes out and two minutes to put it back in at the end of the job and it was no stress.
Oh and it was a big block of white polystyrene for cutting wings out of. Wasn't going to hurt anyone after it was secured.
Dave
Dave
FollowupID:
380235
Follow Up By: flappa - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:42
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:42
Quote: As a Paramedic I reckon cargo barriers should be a mandatory fitment in all wagon/hatch style vehicles. I wouldn't put my family in the front without one.
And what if you use the back seats ?
FollowupID:
380271
Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 14:25
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 14:25
I assume you mean the rear seats as in the third row?
I probably wouldnt but my kids in the rear seats in the likes of a commodore or falcon. They are in a crumple zone. The safety aspect of those is a bit up in the air. I know back in the days of VT commodores there was thought that they were safe as long as the crash load occurred low enough.
In a Patrol or Cruiser theres a better chance that that will occur as the vehicle is higher and they don't sit right against the tailgate like the feet and ankles of littlies in a regular station wagon with rear facing seats.
As for the cargo barrier - don't pack much behind the third row seats. There's bugger all space there anyway. You'd hardly be leaving on a round the country trip with all of the seats full. I don't have that many kids but i reckon those that do probably have roof racks and trailers that solve the missile problem.
Basically if you fit a cargo barrier, then pack everything you practically can behind it, and then minimise the crap inside the passenger compartment you are far safer.
Where's your club lock? The handle fits in your eye socket and it's been done in a rollover in Victoria....
Took me two seconds to find one good reason. There'll be plenty of others.
Makes interesting reading. The crash wasn't even his fault.
Dave
FollowupID:
380282
Follow Up By: flappa - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 14:42
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 14:42
You have just pointed out EXACTLY , why it cant be mandatory ?
How can they be mandatory when the option to use 3 rows of seats are there ?
I USE 3 rows , so I dont fit a Cargo barrier. When the kids grow up , I probably will , but . . .
How can you try to make them mandatory.
FollowupID:
380285
Reply By: Longreach - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:23
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:23
I also think cargo barriers are an essential item.....for some. For others definitely not. eg. those who use the very back seats. Some station wagons have dickie seats. Cargo barriers are a good idea depending on how you use the vehicle, hence, it wouldn't make much sense for them to be mandatory. (BTW, I have one)
AnswerID:
124887
Reply By: flappa - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:39
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:39
They should remain OPTIONAL.
Why make them mandatory, defeats the purpose of having 7 seats.
You want one , fine buy one , dont FORCE me to have one.
AnswerID:
124891
Follow Up By: bware - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:29
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:29
I couldn't agree more Flappa. I notice you have this reaction to a number of posts! I'm just raising the point in regards to all the people who swear that they are the most important accessory. Personally I hate rules and I think laws are designed for guiding stupid people. Late one night afer work in
Sydney I drove to a
lookout at North Bondi to watch a lightning display over the ocean. To my dismay there was a
sign which read 'NO STOPPING 10pm-6am'. Watching a beautiful display of nature was a traffic infringement! So I left
Sydney and moved as far as possible from others rules as is practical (100 acres on far North Coast).
FollowupID:
379751
Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37
Bloody Oath, talk about PITA! Why the hell does everyone (especially the government) think they need to wrap me in bubble rap!!!!!!! F%&K OFF, I can look after myself thank you very much!
I have my own storage box which takes the place of a cargo barrier and I DON'T WANT ONE. Go away you doo gooders!
FollowupID:
379752
Follow Up By: Member - bushfix - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:34
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:34
oh come on Jeff, tell us what you really feel :)
FollowupID:
380246
Reply By: cokeaddict - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:54
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:54
Brian,
Part of the reason why the are not Mandatory items is due to the fact that making them mandatory removes 1 critical escape point in an emergency. Picture some situations where vehicles have rolled over. In most cases they lay flat on front as thats where the weight is, and in some circumstances this crushes the body thus not allowing doors to open. So this gives you 1 other option and that is to crawl out through the back. Imagine same situation after sliding down a muddy
hill into a river to the point where the front doors cannot be opened. If the cargo barries was there, you loose what chance you had of useing the rear doors as your exit point.
I have a cargo barrier in my GQ, swear by it. But then again, i believe it was good decision they made when they suggested it should be an optional fitment and not a mandatory one.
Ange.
AnswerID:
124894
Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:40
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:40
Spot on mate! Good to see someone with common sense! I was in a rollover where that EXACT situation occured!
They are good in certain situations, but it's YOUR decision to fit one, it's YOUR LIFE, YOUR CAR. If the government want to buy me a 4wd and give it to me for nothin and tell me that I HAVE to have a cargo barrier, great no problems, I can deal with that, but until that time GO AWAY AND LEAVE ME ALONE!
FollowupID:
379753
Reply By: robak (QLD) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:58
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:58
wasn't there a story a few years ago where some kids died in the back of a station wagon because they closed the rear door and with a cargo barier fitted they couldn't get out.
AnswerID:
124906
Follow Up By: cokeaddict - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:06
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:06
robak,
Yes there have been a few over time. Whatever way you look at it you cant win. If you fit one, you feel safe from missiles heading towards you under hard breaking, on the other hand, fit one and u end up in a river with the only way out is the back doors, and your stuck. It has to be a personal decision. I for 1 have one in
mine. Connon sense plays a HUGE part in safety, but if your number is up, then there is nothing anyone can do about it.
That aint going to stop me from seeing this great country though. I would rather cark it outback than in the city anytime :-)
FollowupID:
379756
Follow Up By: Scubaroo - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:53
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:53
Just had a cargo barrier (Milford) fitted two days ago - interestingly, it was supplied with a glass breaker fitted on the back side of it, so that if someone was ever trapped in the back, they can get out.
Now a glass breaker in FRONT of it would get around the problem of not escaping the vehicle in a rollover. Interestingly, my in-laws live in Florida, and it's mandatory there for all vehicles to have a glass breaker within reach of the driver, because so many old people drive off the road into canals :)
FollowupID:
379761
Follow Up By: Member - bushfix - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:57
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:57
"glass breaker fitted" ?
mine was given to me loose so it goes anywhere. my prado (early one, 7/96) has no door opener on the inside of the rear, hmmm. yep i think it's illegal to put people behind the barrier (at least in NSW) since that tragedy with the kids.
FollowupID:
380249
Reply By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:07
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:07
bware, You don't happen to sell, manufacture or fit them do you?
AnswerID:
124907
Reply By: Member - Duncan W (WA) - Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 20:53
Friday, Aug 12, 2005 at 20:53
Sister in law has one in the back of ther Commodore wagon. She had to climb into the back to do something and the wind blew the tail
gate shut, middle of a WA summer. All alone in a locked back of the wagon. Fortunately she found a washer and was able to undo the securing screws.
She was damn lucky.
Dunc.
AnswerID:
124981
Reply By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:55
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:55
The only reason I have one is that I don't want a 40 litre fridge full of beer and food hitting either my wife or I in the back of the head in a prang. It may be otherwise inconvenient in a lot of ways... and it rattles and squeaks like a ba$tard... but I don't trust a few straps and a fridge slide to keep all that inertia in one place - in the back where it belongs.
AnswerID:
125539
Follow Up By: Member - bushfix - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:33
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:33
as
well as that, it allows me to pack to the roof when not using the 3rd row of seats, I don't tow and I avoid the roof rack if possible.
FollowupID:
380265
Reply By: Patrolman Pat - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 19:54
Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 19:54
The crash barrier is the first thing I buy as an accessory in a car. Admittedly I use my car for work so it's always full to the roof with cr*p.
Mine takes less than 5 mins to remove or reposition behind front
seat if needed.
AnswerID:
125629