River Crossing

Submitted: Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:00
ThreadID: 25613 Views:3539 Replies:8 FollowUps:25
This Thread has been Archived
Something I have always wondered is why do you need to put a tarp accross the radiator when crossing a river?

If you are driving a Diesel with a snorkel would this be an overkill or is it so the radiator is not distroyed by the fan?

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:15

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:15
Even with a snorkel fitted, it's still good to be able to keep as much water out of the engine bay as you can by creating a bow wave... but I mainly use a tarp to, yes, keep the fan from screwing its way through the water and into the back of the radiator. I can also stop my fan altogether (temporarily) by trapping a blade wit a special wire hook I've rigged up - and let the viscous clutch slip for the duration of the crossing.
AnswerID: 125239

Follow Up By: cokeaddict - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:20

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:20
Hey chrispy ole mate ole chum....
Speaking of snorkels.....
You have any idea who sells the flex hose that sits between the round filter assembly and the air cleaner body? Think mine is about ready to be replaced. Hope all is well over your way.

Damn bro...u got enough 4b's to play with?

See ya
Ange
0
FollowupID: 379983

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:32

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:32
Hey there Ange :)

Do you still have the aircleaner with the square inlet on your turbo conversion?

I'm still out to lunch on this one, as even though I installed my snorkel over the weekend, I still haven't finished the inside bits. I'm still contemplating removing the round cyclone unit altogether and plumbing the aircleaner direct to the front guard flange (which I stole from my RB30 Patrol). This gives a totally sealed unit - as long as there is nothing untoward about removing the cyclone unit. I hardly see the need because the turbo negates the cyclonic effect anyway.

The original tubing which you have is also stuffed on mine - it's been worn though on the apex of the bellows section by rubbing on some airconditioner piping. I'm looking at totally replacing it with either a new one from Nissan (you'll see the Nissan logo stamp on the square section of that tube) or going with some more robust ducting from somewhere as yet undetermined.

Too many 4by's? Never !! :)

I'll put up a few more photos as I work it out over the next couple of days.

Cheers mate
Chris
0
FollowupID: 379988

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 14:17

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 14:17
Crispy,
What about doing away with the big oval filter and using only the "pre-filter" behind the headlight? In the GU 4.2TD, they only have one filter and that's where it is.
When I owned my GQ diesel, I used to run around 90% of the time with only one filter; putting the 2nd one in only when going on really dusty roads etc.
Just a thought for making the engine bay a bit less congested.
Cheers
Roachie
0
FollowupID: 379995

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 14:31

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 14:31
Roachie - more room? Wouldn't that be nice! :)

Mine is probably a little different to most TD42's in that the Dynamic turbo kit uses it's own specially-cast airfilter box (even has a map of Australia cast into the aitfilter lid). It maintains the original cyclone (round pre-filter) behind the headlight and THAT unit has no real seal at all onto the LHS guard. It just sort of pokes through to the other side.

I really want to use the Dynamic airfilter as it has good rubber seals under the four spring clamps that hold the lid down.... so I think I'll permanently remove the first cyclone instead (in my case) and plumb directly from the guard flange to the aircleaner box. Removing that cyclone immediately gives me some more room behing the LHS headlight which will make my shower plumbing easier to route :)

Do you have a photo of your old GQ's engine bay at all?

Cheers
Chris
0
FollowupID: 379997

Follow Up By: cokeaddict - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 15:52

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 15:52
Hi Chrispy
Yes mate I have the oval air cleaner fitted but its a modified one from Denco, allows more air in than the std air cleaner box. As for the air cleaner behind N/S headlight, Yes that can be taken out. I will be removing mine soon too, (also need the room) thats why i asked if you knew where to buy the hose, once i remove the box my hose wil be too short. I had this setup on my 89 GQ (non Turbo) and i ran a donaldsons at top of my snorkel which worked a treat, increadable how much bleep it scooped up that would of normally ended up in my air filter. tripled the life of my air filter too.
0
FollowupID: 380016

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 16:19

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 16:19
Sorry Chris, no photos of the old GQ at all mate. (I'm not into photos all that much).
I certainly understand your reasons for wanting to get rid of the pre-filter now....that area behind the headlight would be nice to have freed-up for other uses.
Good luck with it mate.
As for the (approx) 3" diameter bendable hose, I would imagine that any truck supply place should be able to assist.
Cheers
Roachie
0
FollowupID: 380020

Follow Up By: Member - Duncs - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 17:37

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 17:37
Chrispy,

I bought mine (3" flexi hose) at a Pirtek franchise.

I think it was manufactured by 3M so they may be able to help you locate some too.

My GQ also had the precleaner removed and it worked just fine. It also had the shower pump and battery isolater in the space it left behind the headlight.

Sorry I don't have photos. I had more than one mechanic shake his head while looking under that bonnet. That old GQ had more accessories than an ARB outlet. It even had a welder in the glovebox.

Duncs
0
FollowupID: 380030

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 18:09

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 18:09
Thanks for the input everyone :) (I feel like I've highjacked the original thread :( )

Denks - I will try Pirtek tomorrow. Good idea. I'll also seewhat WesternStar down the road has - thanks Roachie! :) I'll let you all know....

Ange - First thing I put on when I go on a trip - my Donaldson. The amount of junk that it traps is incredible.

Cheers guys

Chris
0
FollowupID: 380036

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:38

Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:38
I've just ordered a 1 metre length of 3" wire-wrapped suction hose from Pirtek - should be in tomorrow morning. I'm interested to see how it's going to form around the square section on the aircleaner.........

I'll let you know!
0
FollowupID: 380137

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 18:19

Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 18:19
Chrispy,
Should be like that movie about Appollo 13 when Tom Hanks and his crew had to cobble together 2 different bits of gear....including fitting a square thing into a round thing.... hahahaha

Good luck mate.

Roachie
0
FollowupID: 380193

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 18:24

Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 18:24
LOL!! Yeah - the CO2 scrubbers.... hobbled together with duct tape, two plastic bags and a sock!
0
FollowupID: 380195

Reply By: flappa - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:17

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:17
Its normally done for 1 of 2 reasons.

To create an airpocket under the bonnet (not so much of an issue on Diesels, but handy on modern diesels) , and to reduce the risk of the Fan being sucked into the radiator, damaging or breaking both.

Its normally quicker then taking off the belts , and in a lot of modern vehicles , the belt drives more things then just the Fan.
AnswerID: 125241

Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:23

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:23
Something else to be aware of..............

I've got a 4.2 TD GU Patrol with a snorkel and have always been "confident" when going through water that the air intake was well protected.

I recently bought a new set of headlight globes off ebay and was looking under the bonnet on the weekend to see how to go about getting them into the back of the headlight. Nissan have left only a tiny gap on the left side headlight, between it and the air cleaner housing. I was having a bit of look at what's involved in getting the air cleaner box out (3 bolts through the mudguard/wheel arch) and noticed that the area where the air cleaner box adjoins the inner guard, is not properly sealed. When the snorkel was installed, it seems that a feable attempt was made to put silicon part way around the join, but it is by no means water proof.

The message is.....don't take your air intake system's water resistence for granted.

Cheers

Roachie
AnswerID: 125244

Follow Up By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:39

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:39
Too right Roachie - found the same on my Safari installation on the Jack - before I go north next, I'll be having a very good look at my whole set up from on end to the other - and use a tarp as well ! At present, my setup is serving me well on the issue of low dust ingress - that's all I'd put my money on till I look further.
0
FollowupID: 379966

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:57

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:57
Also - beware of the rubber "split nipple" drain device slung under your primary cyclone. It's designed to let water out more easily than in - but if you don't clean it regularly it clogs up with dust and twigs from the inside, etc and this leaves the slit at the end open because it is full of junk. When you are under water (with a vacuum in the snorkel and cyclone) you get water STREAMING in through it.....
0
FollowupID: 379969

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:44

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:44
I also found my snorkel's join from the rubber hose (to the airbox) where it joined to the base of the snorkel had the hose clamp SO loose that it was just flopping around and it was not sealed at all!! Dogdgy install!

If your viscous fan is working correctly and you rev the motor before going through the crossing until the fan unlocks, you should'nt have a problem with the fan. Once the water hits the viscous coupling it should cool it off enough to prevent it locking during the crossing. The only time you could get into trouble is that the fan will be locked when you start the car or let it idle for a long period (checking depth etc) so you need to make sure you unlock it (rev the motor till the fan noise stops) to prevent it from doing damage if you CHARGE at it. (which you shouldn't do anyway!).
0
FollowupID: 379974

Follow Up By: Shawn - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:50

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:50
Too right Roachie,
Had a look at my Factory fitted snorkel about 12 months ago, when a member on here, suggested that snorkels is not as waterproof as we think.
Bugger of a job, but I took the complete snorkel out and it was not waterproofed (silicon sealed) at all. The three joins within the snorkel are now waterproofed to my standard, which I'm afraid is higher than most people doing the work you pay them for!!
Cheers
Shawn
0
FollowupID: 379975

Follow Up By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:22

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:22
Indeed Chrispy - noted - I too saw that drain device as a potential source on disaster. I think the fan blades issue sounds a biggy too - come what may, they should be held still by one means or another - I can hardly see my alternator as well, and its down low - will have to take my chances on that factor.
0
FollowupID: 379985

Reply By: TONY N. - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:39

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:39
Thanks to all for your comments and answers.

Rochie has a good point too, how well is our snorkel fitted and when was the last time we checked if it was fitted properly. Bit late when hydrolic'ed your engine.

Will check my snorkel tonight.

Thanks again.
AnswerID: 125247

Follow Up By: TONY N. - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:40

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:40
Sorry for the typo Roachie.
0
FollowupID: 379967

Follow Up By: Rosco - Bris. - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:02

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:02
A simple answer may be to block the inlet ... your hand??.

If the engine starts to stall OK, if it continues to idle happily it's obviously getting plenty of air from somewhere along the line.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 379978

Follow Up By: cokeaddict - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:24

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:24
Ummm just in addition to Rosco's excellent tip on finding leaks.....
DONT put your hand there if you plan on revving the engine. Had an incident a couple of years ago with my son on my old GQ, He decided to put his hand over the hole while i was revving engine (not seeing him there) and he couldnt get it free until i dropped the revs back to idle after hearing screams ....lol
Just as well he didnt have a rag in his hands at time.
Ange
0
FollowupID: 379986

Reply By: muzzimbidgie - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:56

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:56
When I first came accross ExploreOz, I posted a thread about dust passing thru a gap in the intake system of my car, which is why I had the snorkel fitted. Many respondants to my thread recon I,m a d!!khead and there must be something wrong with me to suggest nissan would make such a potentially fatal flaw, but i'm telling you, as Roachie has stated, the intake system on da patrol is not the best.

When I had the snorkel fitted to my GU patrol I was advised that the car was
NO-WAY water proof above the tyres. They said the intake system would have to be altered to be water proof, and they gave me warning that they did not warrant the instalation against water ingress !!! (no matter what make of car)

.
AnswerID: 125248

Reply By: Bob of KAOS - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:51

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:51
I think a lot of people have more faith in tarping than a rational analysis would warrant.
I reckon once you enter the water the water very quickly runs around and under the tarp so that at best there may be a few seconds of relative dry in the engine bay.
To visualise what I mean picture the transom on an aluminium tinny doing say 2 or 3 kph (about the speed you would do a river crossingin your vehicle). The tarp is analagous to the transom. How deep is the water a foot behind the transom at this speed? The answer is "about as deep as the water everywhere else".
If tarping up makes you feel good go ahead and do it, but don't imagine it will keep your fan blades from slicing into water.
AnswerID: 125258

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:00

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:00
True enough Bob... but if you are maintaining forward movement you still do form a lower water level in the engine bay behind a blind. Whether or not that's entirely useful - as you've stated - is up for debate.
0
FollowupID: 379977

Follow Up By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:17

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:17
Obviously a job for the Myth Busters.
0
FollowupID: 379980

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:20

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:20
What..... the myth being "water blinds make 4WD's explode" ?

:) Yeah.... more M/Busters fireworks!!!
0
FollowupID: 379984

Follow Up By: Crackles - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:58

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:58
I really can't tell you Bob how deep the water under a tarped bonnat is other than to say with one I was rarely stopped but without I've seen about 50 people stalled with 3 resulting in blown motors.
Since fitting snorkells on each of my cars I haven't bothered tarping up although they can only help stop water getting into your headlights & electrics.
Many 4bys take the air from behind the headlight which without a blind acts as a funnel forcing the water straight into the motor. At least covering this area is most important.
Now just to burst your boat analogy speed it up to 6 kph (speed I cross a river) & pull the drain plug out of the back. Does the water run in or does it suck the water out of the boat?
Perhaps someone with one of those reversing cameras could install it under the bonnat & see for sure :-))
Cheers Craig.............
0
FollowupID: 379991

Follow Up By: Bob of KAOS - Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:18

Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:18
Crackles
You are observing the Venturi effect with your drain plugs. A valid observation but unhelpful in explaining the value or otherwise of tarping.
Surely the speed of river crossings varies with depth, track surface conditions etc
Your statistical analysis with the 50 people stalled etc has too many variables to be of any validity.
I like your idea of filming events under the bonnet - that would really help "bust the myth"
0
FollowupID: 380103

Follow Up By: Crackles - Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 16:40

Wednesday, Aug 17, 2005 at 16:40
My point of driving faster is that the tarp will only limit the water in your engine bay if you carry sufficient speed. Too slow (2KPH) and it flows around & too fast (10KPH) & it can be forced in. Of course my "statistiical analysis" has no scientific basis but I believe experience in this case has shown me a growing trend that without without a tarp you have a far greater chance of swamping your motor.
Even you would have to question your theory that one only gets a few seconds of breathing space behind a tarp if you'd wittnessed the crossing of several cars on the Jardine River at over a metre deep. At nearly 100 metres wide the bow wave broke over the bonnats yet the top of the motors were almost dry.
Unfortunately back in the early 80's there was no option of fitting after market snorkells unless you were handy with an exhaust bender so had the plenty of first hand experience with tarping up.
Cheers Craig............
0
FollowupID: 380307

Reply By: Member - Duncs - Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 17:50

Monday, Aug 15, 2005 at 17:50
I don't know if you have ever done this but I have.

You sit on the edge of a water crossing and watch your mate drive through. The water appears to be only slightly deeper than the rear bumper. So you venure in confident that the water isn't too deep only to find it splashing up over the bonnet.

The reason this occurs is that the water is forced down and around the car by the forward movement. The same thing occurs in your engine bay. The pocket of air in the engine bay keeps the water (most of it anyway) out. If you stop the water level will come up the back of the vehicle and inside the engine bay although a little slower than outside because it has to force the air out. I don't recommend you try this in water that is much over bumper depth

If you want an idea of how deep the water was in the engine bay open the bonnet and have a good look around as soon as you get out of the water. You should be able to see some evidence of water level especially if you have a look before you go in.

Duncs
AnswerID: 125288

Reply By: Tony F - Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 20:41

Tuesday, Aug 16, 2005 at 20:41
Gotta agree with Duncs, It's fairly obvious the transom of a boat is at the rear, unless it's changed recently. You should really be looking at the pointy end of the boat. The water falls away lower from the bow due to the displacement of the boat. What time is taken up in tarping up,not to much, piece of mind and if speed is appropriate, very little ingress of water to the engine bay. You may fell a little bleep for tarping up, YOU WILL feel BIG bleep locking up halfway across. Go figure, Dunc's is on the right track, and Happy Camping
AnswerID: 125465

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)