Challenger steering
Submitted: Sunday, Sep 04, 2005 at 19:16
ThreadID:
26123
Views:
1742
Replies:
3
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
youngharry52
Hi guys .. and ladies, I am looking at buying a second hand 4b. I am interested in maybe a 2002 Challenger. Has anyone had any experience with the steering becoming quite vague as the kms pile up??
Thanks
Reply By: pickle - Sunday, Sep 04, 2005 at 20:18
Sunday, Sep 04, 2005 at 20:18
Young Harry
Maybe the Question is more vague than the Challenger steering.
I have the 2001 model with 90k on the clock. Now I would not say the steering is vague , just it's lousy turning circle. Thats about the only gripe with
mine. And they are quite a good vehicle.
Pictures here.
http://members.optushome.com.au/hurricane1/
Dave
AnswerID:
128260
Reply By: Member - John C (QLD) - Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:12
Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:12
I have a 96 pajero and I assume a very similar steering box and system.
It always has been vague in comparision to the small cars in the house with rack and pinion!
So how vague is vague, and about how many kilometers are you roughly talking about? My pajero is 9 years old and 248,000k. Nothing really to complain about.
Tyres could play a part here too. Higher profile, tread pattern, or softer side walls, or tyre pressures also make a difference. I know some challenger people run recommended pressures of 26psi and wonder why it is vague, when most people I know run 32/34 psi and maybe 36 psi in challengers and pajeros.
AnswerID:
128313
Follow Up By: youngharry52 - Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:41
Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:41
Thanks Pickle & John
I drove a brand new one, a 2001 with 59k and a 2000 with 110k on the clock. Both second hand vehicles appeared in good nick and tyres had plenty of rubber( don't know what the psi was on them). Steering was good on the newie then got worse as they aged to the point where the 2000 model was a bit scarey. I really like the vehicle and from all accounts, it appears very capable. The best part is the price and the economy. I have driven a petro and deisel Prado, Petrol NM Pajero and a Pathie. The Pathie was the most carlike to drive I thought, the Prados appeared tough, but trucklike (went over the 4X4Xmore torture track, it was great), and the auto Pajero was good to drive but very thirsty it seems. Maybe it just seems that the Challengers are a bit too good to be true ............. Look forward to your comments.
Thanks again
FollowupID:
382967
Follow Up By: Member - John C (QLD) - Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 19:50
Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 19:50
That type of result over 3 cars definitely point the way you suggest.
Not so sure about the 4x4xmore test track though. I regularly pass it on the way to Bunnings. I live on the southside. Mean to sneak in one day and try it out, but it looks a bit tame.
Did you try the cars down Marshal rd, around those roundabouts and speed control islands? I usually sit on the speed limit through there in the pajero at 40km/hr with a good line. Thats with 85 series tyres too! Popping a couple of
wheels over the speed bumps would test the
suspension too. Have had bigger bumps out west.
FollowupID:
383073
Reply By: TASPAJ - Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:56
Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:56
Try and find one with a coil rear end. I think the leaf rear end is a bit outdated
but it seams to be the more common setup on the challenger.
Cheers.
AnswerID:
128325
Follow Up By: youngharry52 - Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 20:14
Monday, Sep 05, 2005 at 20:14
Thanks John,
I didn't try the things you mention. I don't know the southside very
well ..... always stayed north of the river. I wish I could afford a Pajero DID, but we all can dream I guess.
Regards
Chris
FollowupID:
383085