Triton roll over...
Submitted: Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 21:34
ThreadID:
26607
Views:
3033
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
13
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Blue (VIC)
For those lurking around here who are after testiment to the strength of the Triton frame...
[ View Image]
[ View Image]
[ View Image]
From the L200
forum in the UK, 75mph roll over...
Reply By: Member - Duncs - Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 21:50
Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 21:50
Blue,
I attended an accident scene where we did a rescue about 12months ago. Triton roll over at a similar speed. The damage was pretty much the same as shown in theses pics.
One of the occupants was thrown from the vehicle. He had his belt on but had laid the
seat down to have a bit of a snooze. He effectively only had a lap belt on and it didn't keep him in the car. Ouch!
But as yo say the Triton held up Ok.
Duncs
AnswerID:
130925
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 22:13
Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 22:13
Hi Duncs,
I don't envy you guy's going out to pick up the pieces... I reckon I'd be OK until it involved kids... Your perspective changes when you have your own.
The bloke got out of it OK, managed to scab a lift with the tow truck back to the yard to take the photo's. 11 pics all up, it looked like a "soft" roll but none the less it was at 75mph. Just hope I never have to test the theory.
Blue
FollowupID:
385313
Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 23:22
Monday, Sep 19, 2005 at 23:22
Actually an upright
seat with a lap belt will still hold you in the vehicle in most circumstances.
What is more likely and is a risk any time someone lays the
seat back in any vehicle is that in a crash the
seat occupant "submarines" under the seatbelt.
They either end up in the footwell with multiple lower limb and spinal fractures or ejected if the vehicle rolls a few times.
The roof on the triton has held up quite
well in those pics. Going to more car like shapes and styling has lead to huge improvements in rollover safety in four wheel drives, from the days of the boxes on
wheels of the seventies and early eighties. It's very hard to give any sort of structural integrity to a box.
Dave
FollowupID:
385330
Reply By: Wombat - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:04
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:04
75mph! That's ummmmm about 125kmh, holey moley someone was a little bit lucky. Have you got the link to all of the piccies Bunny Boy?
AnswerID:
130994
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 13:52
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 13:52
Here you go PAUL
FollowupID:
385377
Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 17:53
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 17:53
Mustve been 75KMH , them Tritons wont do 125...........
FollowupID:
385404
Follow Up By: Wombat - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:11
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:11
Would you like to post your little speedo picture again for the poor non-believing 3.0 litre TD GU (Gangbaar Uitbarsten) Nissan Patrol owner, Mr Freaky?
FollowupID:
385407
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:42
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:42
This one for Mr Bonz
[ View Image]
FollowupID:
385412
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:58
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:58
Gangbaar Uitbarsten... I've heard it before, googled it and got 14 pages of Dutch websites... I don't read dutch(I can swear a little) so I am still none the wiser. I found an online dutch/english dictionary, no hits there either.
Please to be enlightening me...?
FollowupID:
385413
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 00:09
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 00:09
OK wombat, after many attempts to translate it I decided to phone my Dutch outlaws... Shows how smart I am...
gangbaar uitbarsten=accepted burst out
They think you may have meant:
gangbaar uitbarsting=accepted outburst
FollowupID:
385472
Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 00:40
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 00:40
lol No wonder the fuel
tank is nearly empty
FollowupID:
385476
Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:15
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:15
yer yer yer I have been down that
hill too on my Billy Cart and got up to 110, without a motor...... I do remember Blue mentioning speed accomplishments of said Triton late last year.
I case my rest.
FollowupID:
385489
Follow Up By: Wombat - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:44
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:44
Gangbaar Uitbarsten - Expected to explode
FollowupID:
385520
Reply By: Mike DiD - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 14:12
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 14:12
"It's very hard to give any sort of structural integrity to a box. "
- but try to convince a LandRover owner of that.
AnswerID:
131014
Reply By: Glowplugs - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:45
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:45
Hmmmmm Very suspicious. Vehile only damaged on one side
At 75mph the momentum would have caused the vehicle in to a multiple rollover.
Methinks the Triton maybe tipped over at 7.5mph!
AnswerID:
131050
Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 19:05
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 19:05
If you take a look at the link in the first
feedback, it takes you to the gallery of 11 photo's. It shows that both sides have damage but the front left is the major impact point.
FollowupID:
385417
Follow Up By: Wombat - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:56
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:56
In the owner's words ". . . swerved out to avoid lorry, back end alll over the show, counter steered too many times to count, went off road (grass central reservation) came back to tarmac, barrel rolled and finished off nicely with a 100 yard tobboggan sliding down the M5 on me roof."
and
". . . the mechanicals of the truck are all fine so there might be some good spoo to recover from the truck including 4 brand new geolanders but if it is spooped i have then got to buy it off the insurance company havent seen in the engine bay but i reckon most of that is okay, the truck did start up again once it was rolled back on to its wheels."
FollowupID:
385522
Reply By: Utemad - Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:51
Tuesday, Sep 20, 2005 at 18:51
I have seen other utes with similar damage when they have a canopy such as this one did. The canopy acts like a roll bar (or cargo barrier) and holds the roof up. Would explain why the front is crushed but not the rest.
AnswerID:
131052