AM or UHF Radio??
Submitted: Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:37
ThreadID:
26923
Views:
3212
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
1
This Thread has been Archived
Carl & Kaz
I know the differences between these types of radios, so this question is not about which is better quality reception or greatest distance etc.
What I am interested to know is who uses AM nowadays? 20 years ago I had an AM and it seemed that most truckies and 4WD were using them. I've just started to look into buying one again for the new l/c, and was wondering if I should just buy UHF, or should I get an AM one as
well??
Reply By: Darryn - Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:13
Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:13
Hi Carl & Kaz, the general concensuss today is UHF only. I haven't used my 27 mhz rig for nearly a year now and the last time I had it on I was supprised by the total lack of traffic. It was the
Melbourne Cup L/Weekend and there were plenty of people
camping and driving around. I have also noticed GME no longer lists 27 Mhz SSB sets and retailers like Prestige Comms don't have any 27 mhz SSB sets either. They only list AM only 27 mhz so demand must be non existant. On the other hand it is getting hard to find a quiet channel on UHF especially at holiday times. Go for a GME UHF and you should be right.
Regd's Darryn
AnswerID:
132694
Reply By: Member - John (Vic) - Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:20
Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:20
Virtually no one use AM anymore.
Buy a UHF.
AnswerID:
132695
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 21:27
Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 21:27
I lost the mic for
mine about 2 yrs ago, too lazy to take the console out to throw the 122xl on ebay .. would probably get $10000 for it on ebay prices
FollowupID:
387040
Reply By: Member - Jay Gee (WA) - Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:26
Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:26
As everyone else has stated - virtually no-one uses AM anymore.
But considering how cheap and easy it is to get UHF now - and all the idiots who are getting on and jamming up the repeaters - now would be an ideal for AM to get popular again. Just imagine - an almost private network with no idiots interfering with your conversation.
AnswerID:
132696
Reply By: Tim HJ61 (WA) - Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:58
Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:58
So how come AM CB went off the boil?
Was it just that UHF was the next big thing? I remember having to get a licence for my AM CB, with upper and lower sideband - it was a great unit.
I found some useful commentary at
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~parkerp/cb.htm and
http://www.cmca.net.au/motorhoming/communications/cbradio.htm
The general view from these sites was that UHF provided clearer communication over longer distances (not withstanding the skip of SSB), although it doesn't work as
well in hilly country. It is FM as opposed to the AM of good ol' CB's. There is also a page on this Exploroz site under Communications. But as you say, you know all of this. I went searching to satisfy my own curiosity.
Seems like you COULD have one as
well as a UHF but if so few people use it I'd be thinking it's not worth the money or space. I've got this mental image of a tangle of UHF, AM CB, and HF mikes as someone is calling you and you're not quite sure where the voice is coming from or which mike to grab as you're bouncing around. :-)
Tim
AnswerID:
132697
Reply By: Willb - Monday, Oct 03, 2005 at 18:31
Monday, Oct 03, 2005 at 18:31
Hi Carl and Kaz, I fitted a am set into my vehicle in 2001 and travelled 10,ooo k's and had it turned on while travelling and did not hear any one at all. (and yes it was working) did a 5,000 k trip this year and found it invaluable. (spelling?) You get a lot of clowns on it the same as the old am days but the upside beats the downside. one maker does a uhf/am combo, I think that maybe now that a lot of people use uhf maybe we will start to see a swing back to am because not a lot of these units are around.
Who wonts to start a movement back to AM ?
Will
AnswerID:
132855