Thursday, Oct 13, 2005 at 14:25
“System uses pistons modified to carry a “chemical charge” that initiates combustion from one cycle to the next, thus eliminating the need for spark plugs. High compression, typical of diesel”
It never say’s that the Chemical charge is in-fact petrol, it also say’s that it would run on a lighter fuel such as ethanol or a heaver fuel like Bio-diesel Indicating to me that petrol ‘ULP’ as we think of it would be eliminated from the equation
“The piston head is designed with micro-chambers (MC) containing small connecting holes to the main combustion bowl in the piston. The initial combustion is brought about by the use of glow plugs which are turned off after starting. When fuel is directly injected into the engine at a precise moment, the SCAI design allows a small portion of the fuel to enter the MC.
This allows a slow chemical reaction in the MC which continues into the next compression cycle, thus providing the “chemical spark” for the next combustion.”
So it is still using a outside source (If you could call it that) To keep the cycle ticking over after the glow plugs are disengaged.
To the best of my knowledge (I have never been told different) petrol is not self-combustible it need’s a initial burst of energy to start combustion, as this engine utilises. If buy some outside chance it is in-fact self combustible I would think that the compression needed to make it ignite would be far to high to be feasible, thus why it has never been implemented.
Sorry I must stand corrected petrol must self-combust eventually but the amount of compression needed to achieve this would be too high. The energy needed to compressing the fuel enough to make it ignite on it own would most likely take to much of a % of energy created by the combustion of the fuel there for leaving very little energy (Power) to propel the vehicle after taking into account energy lost thro friction and exhaust heat.
FollowupID:
388534