Patrol and King Springs

Submitted: Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:26
ThreadID: 27323 Views:10908 Replies:6 FollowUps:13
This Thread has been Archived
G'day all, just had King Springs and Koni's put under my Patrol. Ride and handling has improved out of sight!

They lifted the front 60mm, but only about 38mm on the rear (measured from the top edge of the rim to bottom of flare). Is this normal? The vehicle has just travelled 30,000 K's, so I wouldn't imagine the originals had sagged that far (it has never been off road before I bought it).

Should I be taking it back to the mechanic and asking the question or is this normal ???

The King Springs were KDFR-42HD's in the front and KPR-58LP's in the rear.

All help appreciated.

Cheers.

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:59

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:59
Sorry all, it's a GU III, 2004 model
AnswerID: 134888

Reply By: Ken - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:02

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:02
PG, don't think this is right. Is the vehicle level or up at the front, if so you may have the wrong springs for the front, ie could be for a winch fitted vehicle. The front of the vehicle should not be raised more than the rear.
I have King springs but can't recall the model number. My vehicle had about 35k of easy work when I fitted them and the front and back went up the same amount.

Ken
AnswerID: 134890

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:40

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:40
G'day Ken, The sidesteps on the vehicle "look" level. When I purchased the springs I went to the King Springs online catalogue and after much deliberation about which "were the right ones", I finally selected the "middle set" of the 3 recommended for my vehicle.

These were the matched set, but you might be onto something about the winch though.

Cheers,

Peter
0
FollowupID: 388893

Reply By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:41

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:41
This isn't right, if the 04 springs are the same as 03 you have extra heavy duty raised front's and normal raised front's in the rear.
I'm gathering you don't have a winch or a lot of weight on the front. If this is the case then that is why it is raised more in the front.
You will also need to check that the Koni's are Long travel shocks.
Definitely go back to the mechanic and have this checked out!

Let us know how you go.
AnswerID: 134895

Follow Up By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:46

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:46
Correction, you have extra heavy duty front and rear.
Still doesn't seem right.... unless the vehicle wasn't level to begin with?!?
0
FollowupID: 388895

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:04

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:04
G'day Len, just rang the store where I purchased them, and they assure me the springs are the right matched pair, but cannot tell me why the front came up more than the rear. They said they checked the latest '05 catalogue.

They told me the heavy duty ones are KDFR-42 HHD and KDPR-59.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 388896

Follow Up By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:24

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:24
You can check the catalogue here - http://www.kingsprings.com/kings_master_catalogue.pdf

The part no's you just quoted are the Extra Heavy Duty Plus springs.
The springs you have fitted are extra heavy duty.
The standard raised springs are KDFR-42 and KDRR-45.
Standard height replacement springs are KDFS-42 and KDRS-45.

You will have less articulation with the extra heavy duty springs. I don't know whether this is important to you though.

What style of driving are you into?
0
FollowupID: 388899

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:26

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:26
G'day again Len. Your spot on. My selection of these springs was because noone around here could give specifics of how these springs performed, in relation to one set or another. The only advice I could from "reputable" 4WD shops was "their springs" were the ONLY ones to buy, OME, Series 2000, or Ironman and I would have trouble with any other kind. BTW, they didn't like Koni's either. Thank God for this forum :-).

My main use of the vehicle is for outback touring on most of the "popular tracks" in the NT and WA at this stage, and I'll be fully loaded and self contained. Perhaps towing a trailer on later trips.

I have since found out the supplying store simply ordered the springs and shocks through Repco here, and don't have direct contact with King Springs, so I have sent an email to Kings to see what they think.

Regards,

Peter
0
FollowupID: 388907

Follow Up By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 13:20

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 13:20
Peter, you have more than likely selected the right springs for your use. If you are going to be loaded up the heavy duty springs are a good idea.

You may even want to consider some air bags (eg. Polyair) if you start towing a trailer.

You should get a good response from Kings. They have a good sales team. Hopefully they can clarify the reasoning behind the difference in lift from front / rear.
0
FollowupID: 388911

Follow Up By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 13:21

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 13:21
And don't forget to check that the Koni's are long travel shocks. You will need them, especially with a 60mm lift in the front.
0
FollowupID: 388912

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 14:57

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 14:57
Just got this reply back from Kings Springs ......

Peter,

These coils should give the vehicle approx 50mm lift. Part number KDFR 42HD is for additional added weight on the front. Alternately you may use KDFR-42 which is 20mm lower

Regards,


Kris Tarrant

Sales and Technical Services
KING SPRINGWORKS PTY LTD

As far as the back end goes, I'm still at a bit of a loss :-o

Now I'm really confused!
0
FollowupID: 388923

Follow Up By: LBartlett - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 15:49

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 15:49
Check that your coils are actually the ones you wanted. The part number should be printed on the coil itself. Perhaps they are incorrect?

You are going to have to get this checked out more unfortunately. When you e-mailed Kings what did you ask? Did you say that the lift is different front / back. If you give them the measurements they should be able to give you some more info.

When you took the measurement's was your vehicle loaded / unloaded??
Anything else that may affect the load? Steel/Alloy bullbar - towbar - non standrad rear bar?
0
FollowupID: 388929

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 17:22

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 17:22
The vehicle was measured with full fuel tanks, and nothing else inside other than what's supposed to be there. The standard bullbar is the lightweight aluminium variety.

Here is the text of the email I sent to King Springs;

From: Peter Gordon [mailto:pgor9658@bigpond.net.au]
Sent: Monday, 17 October 2005 11:16 AM
To: sales@kingsprings.com.au
Subject: GU III Spring Height

I have just purchased and installed set of KDFR-42HD and KDPR-58LP springs, along with the appropriate Koni shocks, as per your recommendation.



The front of the vehicle has been lifted 56mm on the front left, 60mm on the front right, 33mm on the rear left, and 38mm on the rear right. All measurements were made from under the lip on top of the alloy rim to the bottom of the wheel arch flare, both before and after installation.



My question is, does the lift under the front end seem normal with this type of spring, or is it possible they were not installed correctly, or are these springs designed for vehicles that have a winch, thus the extra lift?

Thanks for your advice.
0
FollowupID: 388933

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 19:05

Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 19:05
G'day again. I got a response from King Springs today. They are at a loss as to why the rear has only been raised 35mm, but Kris Tarrant was very helpful and after discussions about it's intended use he is sending down a set of KDPR-59's.

He has guaranteed these will give me my 50+mm lift,

Thank you to all who replied.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 389249

Reply By: Sea-Dog - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:50

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:50
The supplier can check with King Springs reps and get you the right answers. They will also need to know the distance from the guard to the centre of the axle to check if it is sitting correctly.

Cheers
AnswerID: 134897

Reply By: sean - Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 20:48

Monday, Oct 17, 2005 at 20:48
Take it Back and get it right and you will never look back on a good 2 inch lift. But I had problems getting there too.

I had a GU11 and did a 50mm lift no problems.

Tried to do the same lift on a GU111 with exact same part numbers and the back only lifted 25mm whereas the front went up 50mm. I had been told there was a change between the Gu11 and GU111 by an installer (reputable) and I took the (wrong) advice from the spring manufacturer. I changed the back springs to a 3 inch lift kit and on my GU111 this gives a 2 inch (50mm) lift. I did all the measurements before and after so I know for sure that to get a 50mm lift on the back of a GU111 you need to ensure that the supplier does not use the same part number for the GU11 and GU111. If the supplier uses the same part number for the springs, get a 50mm for front and 75mm for rear and this will match new vehicle specs plus 50mm all around.

Well at least that is what happened on my vehicles..

Sean

AnswerID: 134974

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:35

Tuesday, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:35
Thanks for that Sean. I am taking my vehicle back this morning and having the front end checked to make sure the springs are seated correctly.

The vehicle "looks" level, rides and handles well, so if the front's OK I'll leave it alone.

I'll let you know how I get on.

Cheers.
0
FollowupID: 388980

Follow Up By: P.G. (Tas) - Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:36

Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:36
Had the springs checked this morning and everything that I have is spot on. Had some advice that it's not right though and have forwarded all the measurements and details on to King Springs and just waiting for their reply.

It seems that I may have a set of rear springs with the wrong part no. on them, so we will wait and see.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 389144

Reply By: P.G. (Tas) - Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 19:05

Wednesday, Oct 19, 2005 at 19:05
G'day again. I got a response from King Springs today. They are at a loss as to why the rear has only been raised 35mm, but Kris Tarrant was very helpful and after discussions about it's intended use he is sending down a set of KDPR-59's.

He has guaranteed these will give me my 50+mm lift,

Thank you to all who replied.

Cheers
AnswerID: 135310

Sponsored Links