HF or Sat Phone what is the trend for the future?

Submitted: Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:45
ThreadID: 28360 Views:5766 Replies:12 FollowUps:11
This Thread has been Archived
Hi all,

HF or Sat Phone what is the trend for the future?

Having been through al the "current" information with regards to HF and Satellite Phones for communications including costs etc, (some of that info on this web site).
What are the pros/cons of each system looking into the future and taking into consideration the threats to HF by BPL (Broadband Power Lines) etc.

I would like a system good for not only remote outback destinations but when travelling the high country etc....
At the moment and given the current trend HF seems to be the go still, but what about looking into the future?

Thanks
Will

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:11

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:11
Will - you may have seen the hopefully balanced comment on the Satphones page at VKS737 (I'm the author - but here I speak as an individual - not on VKS737 policy) - re the future - my guess is that HF will stay expensive to buy (new that is) but cheap to use. Satphones should be cheaper to buy but call costs will stay up there. As for the actual comms (why else have them :-) - the pros and cons for each aren't going to change much in my view. BPL MAY start to impact on signal quality at the bases in the urban areas - IF that becomes an issue, I can see the network moving the urban bases out into the sticks. The vast majority of skeds are done via phone interconnects anyway. If BPL follows phone lines to these outer bases, I understand that we can link to the base (might be further "out") via VHF(and beat it that way - already done at one base far as I know). I'm no tech of course - but I'm staying with HF because of the "community" angle - you always get someone and they could be nearby. And when its all said and done, we really only need effective remote-area comms.
AnswerID: 140951

Reply By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:15

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:15
The only reason that we are looking at a sat phone over HF is the portability. We can shove the sat phone in our day pack and go for a walk...and still have access to the world if we injure ourselves or get lost.
AnswerID: 140952

Follow Up By: Footloose - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 13:46

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 13:46
You can do that with an Epirb. The downside of carrying a sat phone may be dropping it etc. ?
0
FollowupID: 394624

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 13:55

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 13:55
hehe... If I sprained my ankle or even broke my leg - I'm still not going to set off an epirb. I agree that carrying an epirb is a sensible thing to do, but there are still many times that a call on a phone is more than adequate - especially if it's a dire emergency where describing the problem to a doctor on the other end of the line could save someone's life on your end. Epirbs take a fair time to respond to - after they've narrowed down the search to find you. I think they both have a place.
0
FollowupID: 394627

Follow Up By: Footloose - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:17

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:17
Chrispy, if I broke a leg or ankle while walking in the bush by myself, I wouldn't hesitate to set off an epirb. I rekkon my cries would be heard in civilization without a radio or epirb anyway! (I have some "experience" here :)
Its a difficult question really. Unless you're loaded, the question of economics rears its ugly head. Ideally, carry a satphone for person to person ("I'm sorry sir I can't find Gary Junction on my map. Which city are you in ?"), eprirb in your pocket as a last resort (at least they'll find my body ) and a HF radio. ("Whatdya mean I can't hear you cause the sun has spots !")
In the final analysis, our safety should be our primary concern, not someone elses.
The cost of buying or hiring any comms gear will seem like peanuts if you get into real trouble.
0
FollowupID: 394631

Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:18

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:18
Very true.

I should have clarified my original post I guess... I never travel alone. My wife is always with me, and usually some other friends or club members too.

If I WERE to travel by myself, and I broke a leg and couldn't move (or was otherwise incapacitated), then you'd better believe that I'd be hitting that little button on the epirb so fast it would make your head spin :)
0
FollowupID: 394672

Reply By: cobber - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:05

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:05
Hi Will, I was pondering the same question as you, and decided to go HF, getting a new Codan NGT installed on Tuesday, I agree with the others, you could be in trouble and someone could be only a few miles from you to help(as long as they have a HF Radio) I will also get an epirb as a back up to use if all else fails...don't forget that you can also use your HF as a telephone Via Radtel, and join VKS-737
AnswerID: 140970

Reply By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:42

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 14:42
Hi Will,

I have both. I have an Iridium Satphone and I have recently upgraded from a 9323 (Codan) to an NGT.

I have no problem justifying the expense of fitting HF and as a paramedic would not travel without it.

Having the HF if one of my mates wanted to borrow the Satphone at the same time as I wanted to do an outback trip I'd probably loan it to them rather than see them travel without comms.

The HF I wouldn't leave behind but the satphone I can do without. I've even thought more recently of selling it. I didn't even turn it on on the last trip to check SMS's, I just told close family to leave a VKS737 message if they needed to get in touch as I frequent the scheds almost daily when on the road anyway.

There's a little more know how required with the HF but it's not hard and practice is the key to getting the hang of it.

It's amazing how many members of VKS737 there are travelling around out there and most are always up for a chat over the camp bbq or a beer when you run across them. They're usually only to willing to help if someone needs it too as is evidenced on the scheds if you listen in.

See a previous post of mine on a medical evacuation from Talbotville a few weeks ago that I coordinated from Swan Hill for a good example.

You are asking for opinions so I'll give you mine.

Buy a second hand Codan 9323 with 9350 autotune for under $2k ($1500-1900 seems the going rate) or if you have to a Barrett 550 and autotune (but make sure it's a late model autotune - the older ones fall to bits eventually,) and join VKS737 & Radtel (calls are half the cost of Iridium). If you have a little extra to spend the NGT is worth it and I heard of a bloke haggling hard to get a new NGT Venturer (i think that's what they're calling it) with autotune at the last 4x4 show in Melb for $3000 which is exceptionally good.

If you still want a satphone later then save your pennies and get one later, but I'm thinking that if you get the hang of the HF you'll never bother.

Luxoluk is another member I know has both and I think he'd probably venture the same opinion - are you out there Leigh??

When on the Canning trip Leigh was still stuck in Melbourne and we conversed regularly by direct link or Radtel to rub in that he wasn't with us. More recently on our Wonnangatta trip Leigh was coming in from Mansfield while we were coming in from Myrtleford. I dropped him a selcal and we had a chat over a hundred or so km as clear as a bell about where we were and when we'd meet and all that sort of stuff. It was free and we talked for about 5 or 10 minutes on and off on the way in checking each others progress and making sure he was okay (travelling on his own in a Toyota - risk taker!)

I could have called his Satphone if we didn't have the radios but it would have quickly exceeded $20 worth of calls.

Let us all know what you decide. Which ever way you go they only have to get you out of the $hit once and they are cheap insurance.

Dave
AnswerID: 140981

Follow Up By: Wizard1 - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 15:32

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 15:32
You can hire SATPHONES but can you hire/rent HF?
0
FollowupID: 394651

Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:57

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:57
Lots of places hire HF gear. In fact a poster here does.

Try Footloose if you want to see what it's like before you commit.

Web Linkhttp://www.jimshire.aussiewide.com/

Dave
0
FollowupID: 394695

Reply By: Member - Raymond - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 16:51

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 16:51
Hi Wizard,
To answer your question you can hire a HF radio for the trip, in Melbourne John at time plus will hire you one for the trip.

Will
I have been travelling in outback Australia for the last 30 years and have always had a HF radio with first as an amateur and then on the VKS 737 network.

The satphone is great if you know who you want to call if you are in trouble and of course have all the phone numbers with you that you may need. They are fairly cheap to buy, but expensive to run. (I know price doesn't matter if you are trouble)

The advantage of HF Radio is you can talk to an operator 24 hours aday, get local weather reports Road Closures, even a good spot to camp or fish depending on who's on base. If you are in trouble they will get you the advise you need, even order the part for the vehicle and often another member will come to your aid either to deliver the parts or even help you repair it.

On one trip we had damaged a fuel line and lost alot of fuel, another emember hearing of the trouble went out of his way to bring fuel and although we had done temporary repairs to the line, picked up a new hose just in case. Refused payment for his trouble and we enjoyed a beer and a meal together, all he wanted for his trouble. Sat phones don'y do that.

Go HF and if you have the extra cash get a sat phone as back up

Ray
AnswerID: 140992

Reply By: GUPatrol - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 16:53

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 16:53
Thank you all for the replies...

It seems that Codan NGT is the prefered option rather than the Garrett 550, is there a specific reason why?

Which one takes less room in the installation?

I had a look at the installation, sizes etc on this page but never seen a Codan NGT, the web site doesn't show much detail.

Thanks Again.

Will
AnswerID: 140993

Follow Up By: Footloose - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:10

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:10
The Codan NGT is the latest Codan mobile set. Codan and Barrett are a bit like Fords and Holdens. Having said that, Codan has an excellent name and is used all over the world and by the UN.
The NGT has a handset like a mobile phone (small footprint) and its operation is similar (when programmed correctly).The NGT also has DSP which basically means that under poor conditions you can hear a signal much more clearly than a non dsp set.

The Barrett is slightly different in its operation, and doesn't have DSP.

Details of the NGT can be found on Codans site by downloading one of their pamphlets.

Yes I do have an attachment to Codans, so please let's not argue over which is best.
0
FollowupID: 394669

Reply By: pafc - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 17:05

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 17:05
Will
When i crossed the simson I hired a HF and joined VKS, only having 4 weeks off a year it's not often I can get to remote areas to justify the cost. I did enjoy the security of listening every evening just to see whats hapenning. I pick up my new Rodeo on Monday and heading to WA for a month, think I might try a Sat phone this time.

Alex
AnswerID: 140997

Follow Up By: GUPatrol - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:59

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:59
Alex,
When I crossed the Simpson we hired a sat phone, pretty boring really (OK in an emergency I guess).
On other trips I travelled with others who had HF and we could access information on weather, listened to others etc.
While in birdsville once I saw how someone was organising parts for his Oka using the HF radio.

So I used them both, I was just trying to work out what was the way of the future but it seems it is still HF.
Will
0
FollowupID: 394696

Reply By: kiss'n'dirt - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:50

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 18:50
Personally

I would hire a Sat phone and have an EPIRB and UHF (vehicle and handheld).

If something happens to your truck (blows up), you're fu*ked. Your HF can't help you. Even if you did hire it and it's portable.

Ask the poor family whos 60 series blew up. The poor bastard drove some distance away from the camp fire as well to refuel from the jerry's. Just unlucky that the fumes actually travelled that far. Wife and kids couldn't do sh*t.
No sat phone, they had UHF and HF.

Lucky there was a camp close enough that heard it.
I'm pretty sure the guy died at hospital.

I personally have a small 'MAN BAG' that has all my wallet, GPS, mobile, UHF and if i hired a Sat phone, that would be in it as well. I leave the vehicle when back at camp, it comes with me.

I know where everything is. You just can't be too careful.

I think HF is a great idea but not fool proof. Nor is a Sat phone. But i feel safer with a Sat phone. I can at least ring someone and pass on my GPS position.

That's what i think.
Hope it helps
AnswerID: 141013

Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 21:06

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 21:06
Someone can page my HF and it will tell them my GPS position and I don't even have to be in the vehicle - or conscious!

Haven't heard about the 60 series but if they had a Satphone like 99% of all travellers it would be in the vehicle.

There's no perfect solution, but there's 8500 members on the other end of the HF (not all at once) and one person on the other end of the Satphone.

Dave
0
FollowupID: 394699

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:46

Friday, Nov 25, 2005 at 20:46
I'm a fan of HF - its more social, and you can access plenty of opinions, or professional help easily thru VKS. And I can phone home thru a HF phone network. So I don't need a satphone.

But if I were to travel alone, I'd throw in an Epirb as well. Its pretty easy to roll your vehicle on a slippery track, and that usually wipes out the HF. Also, if something happened to me, others can activate an Epirb easier than the inexperienced using the HF.
AnswerID: 141032

Reply By: Willem - Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 00:05

Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 00:05
This subject comes up on a regular basis

I have had a HF radio since the 1970's. On a couple of occasions it has been used in anger and has been worth its while. Sometimes I will listen in to VKS chatter but 'out there' I prefer to have peace and quiet in the bush.

Two years ago I bought a 2nd hand satphone and am linked up with Telstra. I find that the Satphone is more useful especially when travelling in remote areas. I can phone a friend on a regular basis to give a destination report.

The trend however is that we are going softer and softer as a human race developing so many accessories to make our lives easier and safer to live and some of us live in the fear of What If? As mentioned in a post above there are always extreme cases of things going wrong in the bush and there is not always a simple fix. That should not deter you however from taking whatever comms you need to take with you.

There are lots of used radios and phones out there which should not cost you a fortune. I would get both HF and Satphone and EPIRB if you want peace of mind. It depends entirely on how far you intend to get off the beaten track. If you are only sticking to byways then you can get either the HF or the Satphone.
AnswerID: 141061

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Monday, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:37

Monday, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:37
When Working fot the Geological survey we used HF only (barret multi tap) (sat phones were available for the males who could travel solo) and never missed a sked due to bad conditions. Having said that the next companyu i worked for had Codans with auto tune (bloody useless) and hands free sat phone which was a revalation for easy to hear and use compared to HF. The argument over rolling a vehicle and busting the antenae is a bit dumb as you would always carry the old 5 dollar max emergency ariel. The one person In the Survey who managed to roll a vehicle in the Pilbarra still got the call away while trapped upside down in the vehicle. Having said all that i have an HF for emergencys and the whole kit and caboodle came in at 600 bucks (barrett 250)
0
FollowupID: 394921

Reply By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:32

Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:32
Phew - that question stirred them up GU ! Should say that the latest Barretts and the Codans are very good in their own ways - different approaches and design ideas, but doing the same thing. Options in each system let you decide on features required. Barrett is usually quite a bit cheaper than Codan - both have a very good reputation - each having a very big market overseas - I've met the CEO of Codan - he said nearly all of their product is sold overseas - much the same for Barrett. If you only want to talk to someone (not necessarily selcall or use radphone), some of the earlier HF types in fine order can be had for well under $1000 - that level of outlay, teamed up with a Satphone might a good idea ? - I use the Barrett 950 with autotune antenna - has worked very well for me to date.
AnswerID: 141090

Follow Up By: GUPatrol - Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:41

Saturday, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:41
Hi,
Thanks for the responses so far.
I am leaning towards the Barrett 950 at the moment.
Will
0
FollowupID: 394771

Reply By: ringa - Sunday, Nov 27, 2005 at 15:05

Sunday, Nov 27, 2005 at 15:05
I dont have a Sat phone, but have had Hf for years, and am a member of VKS. Will not rejoin VKS after this year, as it seems that all the bleep s that were on CB, are now on HF, as On my trip through Qld This year I could not access Base Stns, due to inconsiderate boneheads who persist in swamping calls to the bases with their Bloody Selcall signals. They press the selcall button before their miniscule brain is in Gear. To the smart sod who told me to learn how to use the radio, I am a Qualified Marine Radio operator, and have used Hf for years. Never again for me.
Ringa
AnswerID: 141205

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)