33's V 35's - Advantages & Disadvantages
Submitted: Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 13:50
ThreadID:
28517
Views:
6436
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Troll 81 (QLD)
Hi Guys,
A mate of
mine is after some info can someone help on this?
looking to fit either a set of 33's or 35's to a patrol for both onroad and offroad use. Have been cautioned to buy 33's for fuel ecomony reasons & wear and tear on drivetrain etc.... Seeking thoughts for and against each. Thanks guys. GU Patrol (4.5L Petrol - Manual)
tyres - either a Mickey Thompson MTZ or Radial Claw
Thanks
Reply By: revhead307 - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 13:59
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 13:59
I fitted 33 BFG muds to a GQ trol...liked them a lot. However, without a body lift or
suspension lift, they would bottom out under the vehicle going over large bumps.
i noticed my top speed dropped by about 20 kms. a little less power up top and slightly noticable fuel econ.
you would get away with 33's easily with a 2 inch lift, body or
suspension...35's would require higher lift..and all that comes with it.
sometimes on full steering lock, 35's will also touch the front guards
Rev
AnswerID:
141731
Follow Up By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 15:03
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 15:03
Hi Rev
He is looking at putting a 5inch lift in
FollowupID:
395387
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 00:35
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 00:35
Why would you put a 5inch lift in a GU? You can run Q78x15 Swampers (36s) with 3inch lift, and no rubbing.
FollowupID:
395493
Follow Up By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:18
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:18
becasue thats what he wants to do Truckster. He will be able to answer you soon. He signed up yesterday but had to wait 24 hours before he can post and thats why I posed for him
FollowupID:
395497
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 13:10
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 13:10
also in Qld with a 5inch lift, you will be cop/RTA bait... the fines suck too
FollowupID:
395549
Reply By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:07
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:07
Yea I run 295/75 R16 on
mine and it's not 2 bad under a 2 inch lift, I am thinking going to a 315 though
Thanks
AnswerID:
141732
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:14
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:14
Other issues to remember....
Braking is compromised the larger your tyres are.
If he goes to 35s, he may have to change diff ratios.....something I've been bleating-on about in another recent post on this
forum (and still have no idea what I'm gunna do anyway!!!! hahaha)
Roachie
AnswerID:
141733
Follow Up By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:17
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 14:17
Hi Roachie
Can you explain a bit more about why you should change the dif ratios?
Thanks
FollowupID:
395382
Follow Up By: Exploder - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 20:50
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 20:50
Your gearing will become too tall.
I.E> Most sedans’ run 3.23-diff ratios turning say a 22-inch tyre, which gives good cruising speed and Ok take off. For better take off people may put in 3.73 or even 4.11 ratio but at 110 the car’s revving at say 2900 instead of 2100.
Now the patrol probably comes with something like 4.11 gears standard witch suites it
well for the size tyres it’s running, so by putting on 35’s you will do the opposite to the above mentioned, as
well as stressing components, forcing them to turn bigger tyres on sock diff ratios.
FollowupID:
395448
Reply By: Turbo Diesel - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 16:16
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 16:16
In reality are the 35's for the money going to get you further, i'm not sure. My father in law runs a 235 85R16 BFG MT when off road on his cruiser, you will find that this tyre is in between a 33 and a 35 in overall height. Personally i would run with the 33's easy to stop, lighter cost less. However i would not run them on the road, i would have a road tyre and an off road tyre. THis allows you to put the mother of all tyres on when you go off road but maintain good driving while on road. Plus your tyres last longer and don't draw attention from the transport officers.
AnswerID:
141759
Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 21:30
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 21:30
235/85 16 are 32".
Hope you don't mind the correction :-)
Depending on make, they are 814 to 810mm dia.
I run them too.
FollowupID:
395461
Follow Up By: atoyot - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 21:45
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 21:45
According to the BFG web site, the 235/85-16 is 813 dia, just over 32". It is interesting how the tyre companies come up with the specs, in particular the diameter. For example, 32in Centipedes are over 33' in diameter, according to their ads. It this simply the tread depth that gives it the extra height? If that's the case, then there are some wildly differing examples of misquoted diameters around the different manufacturers.
I guess that the point to this is the question of legality. A number of other posts in relation to tyre size quotes a 15mm increase in diameter, but after just reading the draft new laws on vehicle mods, it clearly says that 4x4's and commercial vehicles can have up to 50mm increase. Either way, is a 15 or 50 mm increase taken from the quoted tyre specs or an actual measurement? Is this a can of worms or what. Sorry to go slightly off topic here, and for what it's worth, 33's are probably the best compromise.
Andrew
FollowupID:
395465
Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 22:08
Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005 at 22:08
Thanks for the correction.
Interesting that they are such a large 235/85 16.
That is draft legislation.
It is a can of worms not worth going into, since it is covered in other posts.
Just trying to work out a tyre to suit is enough of a headache. :-)
Good luck in your search.
I mainly went 235/85 16 10 years ago for easy replacement out west.
Can go 7.5/16 if I have too.
But by the way tyres are going at the moment, 265/75 16 seems to becoming a more common size. 32" OD too.
FollowupID:
395469
Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 00:37
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 00:37
Either way, you will need to be engineered to be legal - and in Qld, you wont get it anymore. If you have an accident and kill someone - you go to jail...
It will change gearing by lots, and you will lose lots of low range power.
AnswerID:
141859
Follow Up By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:20
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:20
Hi truckster
At what point do you need a engineers certificate? when you go over what height in
suspension and over what size in rubber?
FollowupID:
395498
Follow Up By: Utemad - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:49
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:49
You can't get it engineered in Qld. 15mm over standard diameter is max increase on tyres. It is just that we Qlders run the gauntlet an just fit them anyway.
Suspension is max 50mm increase.
FollowupID:
395508
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:08
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:08
As Ute said, 15mm over standard... And in Qld your fubar. The old "but everyone runs them" wont wash in a court room :-s
but if the new "NATIONAL RULES" that are being discussed at 'TOP LEVELS" are anything to go by, when they come in, you will be fine. But that has been discussed at levels since before I bought the GQ 4+ yrs ago.
FollowupID:
395538
Reply By: Turbo Diesel - Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43
Thursday, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43
Tyres the most frustrating topic of all time. The 235 85R16 BFG we have at home emasure over 33 inchs tall, i don't what to say now, but when it comes too tyres i think i would choose one and then hope for the best. In short i'm lost as to what do with my hilux, you think you got problems with your patrol, ha ha. By the way no jokes about Hilux's are needed. Go for the 33's.
AnswerID:
141890