TRAK SHAK - BEHEADING PLANNED .
Submitted: Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:19
ThreadID:
30047
Views:
3669
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
23
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Willie , Epping .Syd.
Howdy All ,
I have a Trak Shak that I bought for many reasons , but the main one was that it had sooo much room inside . Now my kids have up-an-offed , I don't need the room anymore and I find it a pain in the bum to put it up and down when all I need is the use of a bed for the night .
My idea is to remove the top folding hardtop which houses the canvas and replace it with a simple side foldout canvas design with a soft floor .
I want to get a top quality , one which has no poles to put in during the erection - just a couple of pegs on the ends to hold it down .
I figure I can still use the boat rack etc and all the other bits that I love on it if I do this .
So I would be most grateful to hear from anyone who has any ideas or opinions on the manufacturer to use or the design I should use .
Thanks ,
Willie .
Reply By: flappa - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:32
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:32
If I read it right you are in
Sydney.
I'm sure you will find the smaller CT tents , 9 ft or so , will probably work without the need for poles. The internal supports should go to the end of the tent , and be just pegged down.
A company like Complete
Campsite at Gosford(and now Campsie I think) that make their own Tops , are good to talk to about YOUR requirements.
There are probably a few builders around
Sydney that build just the Camper Tops.
AnswerID:
150526
Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:06
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:06
Yes Flappa , I am in
Sydney and you are right about what I want . I will
check out Complete
Campsite .
Thanks .
FollowupID:
403994
Follow Up By: Boo - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:16
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:16
I'll second that one.. Complete
Campsite would be the one I'ld probly go with. They seemed very easy to talk to and very willing to help with different ideas. Wish we'd bought ours through them instead of the company we did.
FollowupID:
403995
Follow Up By: spak - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 13:45
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 13:45
Boo, where did you get your camper from as I am looking at a camper trailer and have narrowed it down to 4 manufacturers. Don't want to blow hard earned cash on a crappy one.
FollowupID:
404032
Follow Up By: flappa - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 13:52
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 13:52
Which ones you looking at.
there are very few "bad" CT makers , just some better then others.
FollowupID:
404037
Follow Up By: spak - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 14:10
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 14:10
Flappa,
We're looking at Tough Country, Paramount, The Complete
Campsite and Challenge.
FollowupID:
404045
Follow Up By: flappa - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 15:36
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 15:36
You are certainly on a good thing with either CC or Challenge.
Dont know much about the other 2.
I personally would be happy to buy either , with my personal pref for the CC. Probably comes down to what you can get from either for the money you want to spend.
The CC guys are very good to talk to and will build what you want , rather then just say , hey , this is what we have , take it or leave it.
FollowupID:
404073
Follow Up By: Boo - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 22:23
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 22:23
Spak..
I'll stress from the start that it's only my findings with the said company and others may be very happy with them.
I will also note that we havent bought any thing from 'Complete' and my oppinion on them is only from discussion and quotes recieved from them and how easy they seemed to sort out and discuss alternatives.
If you hadnt guessed our unit is a little different from an off the shelf style campertrailer..
The company we went with was 'Allterrain' in
Sydney, the quotes we got from several (a lot) of different companies came down to a tie between 'Allterrain' and 'Complete', so we concidered the extra travel time from
Canberra to 'Complete' and ended up going with 'Allterrain'.... BIG mistake, should have spent a few extra hours in the car and would have been a lot more satisfide in the end product. Foud that 'Allterrain' didnt bother to listen to our requirements and when we insisted that they rectified them they got all @#$%%$#@ (while still smilling and sounding polite) . They may be good for the standard product but when you ask for somthing out of the ordinary they havent a clue but still nod and say "yes we can do that.." in total the finish we got on our unit was very second grade, to the point at the end of the season I'm intending to strip the trailer etc back and recote the thing after I grind all the welding spater off and patch some of the joins etc. I couldnt recomend them to any one in all ownesty. They were so proud of the finished product they sold us they wouldnt even put their own name labels on it to identify it to others... I will concede that their tent unit is one of the better ones, but is also one of the pricier ones to boot. Problem is the tent is only half the unit..
Any way ... enough rambling.... still tryin to get over the crap and just enjoy getting out using the beast.
Heading down to Potatoe point in the morning for a few days (till Sunday) so if any one wants to drop in for a cold one feel free, we have the white Patrol and LARGE green camper..
FollowupID:
404204
Reply By: Peter 2 - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 15:11
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 15:11
Willie
To throw another option on the table.
We are in the same position as yourselves, have a perfectly good Cub Supamatic that was great when all the kids were coming away but now seems like overkill for two.
We decided the set the truck up for two, removed the back seats, frig on one side, clothes bags etc on the other and bought a secondhand Shippshape (off Exploroz trader section of course). We've just completed our first longer trip with just the two of us and found that the ease of setting up etc was great, the innerspring mattress was superb and until we are too feeble to climb the ladder it will do us. The camper will still get used occasionally for fixed camps but don'r envisage taking it on too many outback trips.
Oh and the Cibies work
well on the Humvee.
Peter
AnswerID:
150566
Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 18:18
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 18:18
Peter ,
You could put a Shippshape plus a patio barbeque area on the top of that monster .
Was it you that bought my Cibies ?
I have agonised over the rooftop tents . I think they are a great idea BUT you have to pack them up everytime you want to use the car when you are staying somewhere for a few days , BUT 2 - I lose my roofrack space and BUT 3 - Climbing down the ladder half asleep at 4.00 am for a twinkle , could be a problem for me .
So I think I will stick to swags and CTs for the moment . Mind you , our swags are like tents - they are the Ultimate ones which have two mesh side and roof and a big flap to throw over if it rains or is too cold to look at the stars .
Cheers ,
Willie .
FollowupID:
404099
Follow Up By: Peter 2 - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 21:19
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 21:19
Funnily enough you've probably got more roof space than me, the Humvee is 500mm shorter than your 100 series and only 200 mm wider and weighs about the same. The Humvee is narrower than the outside of your mirrors by about 30mm.
It's just that it is lower and square with huge ground clearance which makes it look much bigger.
Yes it was me that bought the Cibies.
The shippshape actually works
well for us and while there have been occasions when we have had a fixed
camp it only takes 5 minutes to close it up and less to put back up. The other benefit is that we can move easily if the neighbours get noisy.
We've got swags too but the attraction of an innerspring mattress in the Shippshape beats the swag every time.
FollowupID:
404169
Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 21:56
Tuesday, Jan 24, 2006 at 21:56
Peter ,
I am sorry I missed you that night . I was called up at the last minute as a reserve player in the tennis comp.
Willie .
FollowupID:
404184