DieselGas
Submitted: Thursday, Mar 09, 2006 at 20:57
ThreadID:
31591
Views:
2674
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
PK Eildon (VIC)
The 4.2TD is booked into the doctor Thurs 6th April for 50l gas tank conversion. Will post my impressions.
Reply By: rickwagupatrol - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 00:58
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 00:58
recently enquired about this very thing. had a very long chat with the rep of DieselGas Australia, here in
Perth. the claims made seem realistic enough, but for me, the biggest downfall was the cost. $10,ooo to fit to a truck seemed abit over the top for me, however i will be making a few more enquiries before i make a final decision on the matter. i will be very interested to see the results as
well, even tho it is being put on a smaller motor.
rick.
AnswerID:
159633
Follow Up By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:12
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:12
It has apparently been available for trucks for nearly 10 years in some form and is quite expensive to set up. The recent advance allowing smaller vehicle use is apparently in the computer technology allowing control of varying and small amounts of gas.
I was talking to a mate who may be described as an ex trucking magnate and he said he was aware of the technology but his view was "just 2 things to go wrong instead of 1".
FollowupID:
414276
Reply By: Trevor R (QLD) - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00
PK,
When you are at the "Gas Doctor" ask them if and already improved 4.2 Turbo Nissan would benifit from the same conversion and if so by the same percentage increase or not? I am already running more KW's and Torque at the rear wheels than they suggest they will get from their enhancement of a standard 4.2 Turbo Nissan.
I have been reading these writeups about this product and am interested in real world executions and longevity of these setups. Any info or experiences you could pass on would be apreciated.
Good luck and regards Trevor.
AnswerID:
159682
Follow Up By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27
If you want to let me know what enhancements you have, I will make specific enquiries
My coded address is:
epv at virtual dot net dot au
FollowupID:
414320
Follow Up By: Member - John - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 19:09
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 19:09
Trevor, what figures are you running and mods? Thanks in advance,
John
FollowupID:
414415
Reply By: bombsquad - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 17:40
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 17:40
Have they got a 50 l tank to fit underneath on the passenger side? Looking into it earlier and thy said only a 28l one will fit.....
check rig - ute - next comment... I will do it the next time I am near an installer. I know it will take me a long time to recover the cost of the unit, if ever, but I look at it as a fuel saver(that works....), a long range tank and a performance chip. From the correspondance I have had with them, It will be over and above any performance mods you already have, unless the mods have a way of making the engine burning a higher percentage of the fuel you are already injecting into it.
Possibly will be geat when combined with a chip that basically puts more fuel in???
Good luck with i, looking forward to your results
Cheers Andrew
AnswerID:
159749
Follow Up By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 20:05
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 20:05
I think 28l is standard fit for under wagon sill. I have considerably more room under tray. They reckon 50l will fit midships under front of tray. They may or may not have to adjust exhaust pipe.
The mob doing it have been fitting gas to petrol and have just moved into this area. It took a bit of convincing them that diesel 4.2 holds about 180l in tanks.
My interest in system is mainly clean motor, more low torque and range. Should easily be able to knock over 1200k bush driving on single fill.
As far are recovery cost, if the system is transferrable to another vehicle as they claim, it may be a once in a blue moon cost. Although there again it may be like computers, it dates quickly with technology advance.
FollowupID:
414429
Reply By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 20:01
Friday, Mar 10, 2006 at 20:01
I think 28l is standard fit for under wagon sill. I have considerably more room under tray. They reckon 50l will fit midships under front of tray. They may or may not have to adjust exhaust pipe.
The mob doing it have been fitting gas to petrol and have just moved into this area. It took a bit of convincing them that diesel 4.2 holds about 180l in tanks.
My interest in system is mainly clean motor, more low torque and range. Should easily be able to knock over 1200k bush driving on single fill.
As far are recovery cost, if the system is transferrable to another vehicle as they claim, it may be a once in a blue moon cost. Although there again it may be like computers, it dates quickly with technology advance.
AnswerID:
159787
Reply By: wheeleybin - Sunday, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:07
Sunday, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:07
Hi to all very very new.
Ive looked at the DG installation and the cost for my 3.1T Isuzu was quoted at $4800.
Ive recently installed a chemical intercooler by Snow Performance USA which all up cost just under $1000AUD installed.
Ist Dyno run as standard 74.3HP at back wheels and many runs and adjustments we achieved 95.1HP at rear wheels and an inlet temp drop of 40oC with similar result on the exhaust temp.
Running costs so far equate to $1 per 200 kilomteres of driving and this so far is using it for power and with the next tank I will run for economy and see what the result is but I anticipate a 15-20% increase.
If there is a way to do it I would post the Dyno results so it can be viewed.
Based on this I cannot justify the diesel gas costs.
Regards
Wheeleybin
AnswerID:
160056
Follow Up By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Sunday, Mar 12, 2006 at 17:30
Sunday, Mar 12, 2006 at 17:30
I think only members can post links & pictures.
I am not interested in just power gain. I already have 98HP. More for the extended range and clean running motor.
FollowupID:
414728