Monday, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:51
In reading the replies to this topic, there appears to be much confusion.
Please keep the following points in mind. They predominantly deal with permanent / fixed installations but are just as applicable to portable setups.
1. Each and every Television Antenna / cable installation is different so where you may get away with something in one installation, you may not get away with it somewhere else.
2. Keeping point 1 in mind, in strong signal areas, the existing
TV antenna and RG59 (thin) coaxial cable) may provide a more than adequate signal level.
3. Not all coaxial cables are the same. There are various types of RG59 available, the quality mainly being in the % of shield coverage. This may vary from about 40 to 90%. The greater % of shield coverage the better = less attenuation.! Resistance in a coaxial cable is called attenuation. The attenuation in a coaxial cable will increase with an increase in frequency, thus VHF will have a lower attenuation than UHF. Often the condition of the connections to older TV antennas is very poor.
4. In order to obtain the best possible TV signal, annalouge or digital, it is best to use quality coaxial cable (RG6 Quad shield - I pay about $110.00 per 305 metres)
with F connections to the antenna and wall socket. Multiple TV outlets will reduce the available signal to all outlets (example: 4 outlets connected via a 4 way F connector splitter will provide less than 25% of available antenna signal to each outlet)
5. The antenna will need to suit the available channels for a particular area so this needs to be checked out. In a weak signal area, a
TV antenna that is tuned to accomodate the Digital as
well as analouge channels will be required.
6. Example of an actual Installation here in
Melbourne.
House in
Hampton, SE suburbs. Old combination VHF / UHF antenna using a 4 way splitter, mostly RG59 coax to 4 outlets, 2 x TVs with digital boxes.
Back TV/ digi box receiving OK in SD - RG59 coax.
Front TV/ digi box receiving pixelated SD & no HD - RG59 coax - closest to antenna.
Replacing the antenna with a 20 element combination unit and the lead in cable and a 4 way F connector splitter provided good HD to the front TV except ABC HD which was pixelated. Replacing the cable from the splitter to the wall outlet with RG6 quad shield coaxial cable provided a good ABC HD signal. This installation was carried out in stable weather conditions so there shouldn't be any variables caused by propagation.
7. The difference between Digital & Analouge TV is similar to that of Digital & Analouge mobile phones. With Digital you tend to either get reception or not. With analouge, there is a degrade in signal but not a complete cut off in marginal reception areas.
8. A pre-amplifier will amplify any signal, wanted or not, received by the antenna. It will not increase the signal received by the antenna. They are best avoided except where numerous outlets or long cable runs are required.
9. Different digital boxes & TVs, even the same model / brand, can have different receiving levels due to factory tuning.
10. The above comments re coaxial cable etc are just as relevant to HF and
UHF radio installations. The key being here that the coaxial cable runs are quite short in mobile installations so the thinner RG58 (50 ohm) cable can be used on UHF.
I hope that this clarifies things. Cheers Tony. (
http://www.qsl.net/vk3cat)
AnswerID:
167343
Follow Up By: c j - Monday, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:43
Monday, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:43
Who's my best bet to get a decent setup installed in a double storey
home in Bayside
Melbourne? I will need new antenna installed as there isn't one at the moment.
FollowupID:
422479
Follow Up By: VK3CAT - Tuesday, Apr 18, 2006 at 13:49
Tuesday, Apr 18, 2006 at 13:49
cj, contact me via email from the vk3cat website
For the record, as
well as being an unrestrited amateur licence holder & WIA education invigilator team leader, I am also an electrical contractor (22years) & open class plus endorsed master cabler.
Cheers, Tony
FollowupID:
422757