Landcruiser versus Hilux
Submitted: Friday, May 05, 2006 at 12:06
ThreadID:
33569
Views:
26671
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
6
This Thread has been Archived
still cruisin'
We are considering purchasing a new 4WD and whilst we want to stick with a Toyota, are undecided between a single cab Hilux and Landcruiser tray back.
As we will be mounting a trayon camper and spending most of our time (full time) off the beaten track, we are leaning towards the extra grunt of the 'cruiser, but would like to hear from anyone who has done a full comparison of the two.
Reply By: strzelecki - Friday, May 05, 2006 at 14:18
Friday, May 05, 2006 at 14:18
That is the very thing I have thought about.I need to replace my 1984 hilux and I only need a hilux for its current
farm type duties,but what if I wanted to put a camper on the back would the cruiser be any better.
On paper there does not seem to be a great deal of difference.
The hilux would win hands down for comfort and economy and normal duties.
In a full time heavily laden off the beaten track situation the cruiser should have the edge shouldn't it ??
The new softy hilux may be an issue for heavy duty use .
I had a quote of $33500 on road for the hilux with steeltray and air,I did not price the cruiser.
I have a lc100 v8 now if they made the trayback as comfortable as that ....is that asking tooo much.
AnswerID:
170934
Follow Up By: bombsquad - Sunday, May 07, 2006 at 23:27
Sunday, May 07, 2006 at 23:27
A Nissan! Just kidding - stick with what you know and want - you don't want this post to go down that track. I would go with the cruiser. I have found the cruisers and patrols always win over the lighter models, even on the blacktop. They just feel 'right', whatever the situation, and tend to go where you point them more than the light ones in difficulty on gravel roads/tracks
Cheers Andrew
FollowupID:
426852
Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, May 05, 2006 at 20:01
Friday, May 05, 2006 at 20:01
I'm biased.......but...
LandCruiser 79series has 180 litre fuel and you can slot in another 90litres aftermarket.
Fuel consumption of both is very good, but slightly favours Hilux.
Suspension goes to LandCruiser.
Ride: Long wheelbase of the 79series makes the ride very good -
mine with ARB
suspension and Recaro seats is better than the Prados I had before .
Engine: LandCruiser factory turbodiesel is nice.
Price: Hilux is cheaper
Payload will be the bottom line if you add a Trayon. The LandCruiser easily takes the weight, and you can upgrade the GVM if necessary. Hilux would struggle. LandCruiser chassis is stronger.
If you can afford it, go the TD LandCruiser.
AnswerID:
171018
Reply By: Member - Barry C (NT) - Sunday, May 07, 2006 at 23:49
Sunday, May 07, 2006 at 23:49
Just been through the exercise,,, ended up with LC79 turbo ute in Dec05,, best decision for us GVM and GCM wiseas we want to tow heavy and also ute only for dert trecks.
If towing (heavy) or going off road seriously go to Toyota dealer and look at strength of chassis, springs etc, you will be amazed when you compare the 2. Not being negative about Hilux but compare the 2 for yourself it's your $.
Only issue I have is road noise and that is the damn Dunlops. Agree with Greg's and Troy's comments.
Power is amazing and smooth and it's easy for Wendy to drive, she loves it also and seats (2 in RV) are good but may end up after market, we'll see.
Cheers Barry
AnswerID:
171448