vehicle earth paths
Submitted: Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 18:36
ThreadID:
36043
Views:
3003
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
6
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Garth J (NSW)
Some expert (read real life experience knowledge ) on vehicle earth (neutral or negative) please.
I've read with interest varying comments re running both +ve and -ve wires to all sorts of things in vehicles.
I guess my question is if we're talking about voltage drop as measured at the terminals of a device compared to whats at the battery terminals then does it really matter if you use a lenthg of wire with a restance of say "x" ohms or the vehicle body of resistance "x" ohms.
The vehicle body being made of metal, and a lot at that, would I believe have less resitance than the black wire. I base this "theory" on the csa of the vehicle vs the wire. I realise the copper has a higher conductivity but the cross sectional area of the vehicle would i believe far outway this. And steel is also a very good conductor.
Are we really worried about hot joints that may devolope at terminations? Is this the crux of the argument? The fact were dealing with 12v as opposed to 240v and the ability of the voltage to push the current past a point of reistance(read any type of join) eg fuse, connection etc.
Interested to see if anybody has had any bad experiences with only the +ve wiring method as opposed to running a pair to everything. Or if the overwhelming way to go is twin.
Could it be just "best practice?"
The point also being that the vehicles are wired as the body being the earth return.
Garth
I think I've dropped something........
Anyone seen a Sir around?
Reply By: Waynepd (NSW) - Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 19:14
Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 19:14
Hi Garth,
I seem to remember the reason being to do with the fact that each body panel will have a different resistance to earth due to the welds and other assembly methods.
The rear quarter panel earth potential will be different to the front mudguard as a connection point to earth. I found it in the instructions for either the installation of the Rotronics dual battery system or some other electrical toy i installed. Can't remember which.....
AnswerID:
184707
Reply By: Eric Experience. - Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 21:18
Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 21:18
Garth
What you say is correct, the steel should be low resistance, if its welded, but a bolt on panel if its painted before asembly can be high. another reason for using two wires is combat magnetic fields, if the wires are together the fields from the two wires are equal and opposite. The times this is important are where there is sensitive things like radio receivers and cd players, phones etc. Eric
AnswerID:
184722
Reply By: Kiwi Kia - Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 22:03
Friday, Jul 21, 2006 at 22:03
Use copper, it has a conductance six times better the 'pure' iron.
Electricity uses the easiest pathway and may actually have several parallel return paths back to the battery. It may even preferentially use a fuel line from the rear of the vehicle back to the engine bay.
Use copper if you can it is relatively cheap insurance to avoid an unexplained 'burst into flames' event.
When was the last time you heard of some one removing the main nbattery earth where it connects to the body to check for paint, corrosion or a insecure crimp job on the lug. No one I know ever checks till something goes wrong.
AnswerID:
184733
Reply By: disco1942 - Saturday, Jul 22, 2006 at 13:04
Saturday, Jul 22, 2006 at 13:04
Garth
You are correct and have been so since all vehicle bodies have been welded together. Since the mid 50s all cars have been unitary construction and if the welds were a problem causing electrical resistance I don't think the cars would hold together for long. Cars with chassis often had earth return wires and the idea that you need a copper earth return has been an urban Myth since this construction disappeared.
Four wheel drive vehicles have their bodies welded together and this forms the basis of their earth return. When wiring up a trailer socket find a convenient earth point close by on the body and not the chassis as the body may be rubber mounted to the chassis.
Caravans are wired using the chassis as an earth return – the earth wire from the plug goes to the nearest practical point on the draw bar, the metal work of the van is in turn earthed to the chassis and the lights pick up their earth from the skin of the van. Their earthing problems are greater than cars.
Eric
Radiation from power or transmission lines is only a problem at high frequencies. At mains power frequencies the only people concerned with radiation are transmission line engineers (yes it is a concern when you have lines 100s of km long.) With DC the only interference problems you will experience is with things like computers or ignition systems injecting hash onto the DC lines – in this case you should suppress the hash at its source.
Kiwi Kia
Generally I don't think fuel lines will be a particularly good earth alternative. The resistance of the body will be a lot less than a thin pipe. This may be a problem if you have incorrectly wired the trailer plug to the chassis instead of the body and the fuel line is the best electrical connection between the body and the chassis.
I also do not think bad connections in the battery earthing will be much of a problem. If you have problems in this connection you will have problems in many other areas that will point you a corroded earth strap. Any problems here will be quickly dealt with promptly or you wont be going far.
PeterD
AnswerID:
184785
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:07
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:07
What he said :)
FollowupID:
441623
Reply By: drivesafe - Saturday, Jul 22, 2006 at 22:14
Saturday, Jul 22, 2006 at 22:14
Hi Garth, running both a positive and negative cable for high current set ups IS a case of best practice, not “ just best practice “.
There is no way of knowing to the point of being 100% sure that the earth return via the body is free of any form of resistance points. Furthermore, there is no way of testing for potential high current resistive points so you only find out about them the hard way.
You may do 1000 set ups and 999 of are OK but there is no room for error. Unlike the vast majority of devices that use the body as the earth return which are low current, things like dual battery systems are high current and as such, the slightest resistance can have severe consequences, least of which is the failure to be able to charge the battery properly.
When you currents of 20, 30 ,40 even 50 amps trying to return through a resistive point, you have the potential for an extremely high temperature generating situation and your own imagination will give you some idea of where this can lead.
Best practice with any high current requirements is to run both pos and neg cables but if you want to get some additional earth return ability then run some earth straps at either end of the negative cable.
AnswerID:
184846
Follow Up By: disco1942 - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 15:16
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 15:16
Drivesafe
You say “When you currents of 20, 30 ,40 even 50 amps trying to return through a resistive point” - who cares if there is even a dozen of these resistive points? There are so many alternative paths that a few bum ones that don't count. If your vehicle has so many resistive welds in it that there is a resistive path between the battery and the rear panels then I for one would not travel in your vehicle. Take it to the wreckers immediately – its a road
hazard.
PeterD
FollowupID:
441617
Follow Up By: drivesafe - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:14
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:14
Hi disco, for a start if there is another path for the earth return that does not impose any resistance then there is no resistive point.
Next, I don’t care how good you reckon the body is for an earth return, there is no way to 100% guaranty that there is no resistance in the earth return, so I, like any responsible installer, will ALWAYS run both Positive and Negative cables, then there is no question of a potential problem. It a case of overkill for safety sake or Russian Roulette for the sake of a few dollars.
As I have my customers
well being to consider, I’ll stick the the safe proven set up every time but if you wish to save a few dollars, that’s your choice.
Vehicle manufactures run earth return cables to points in the vehicles where the manufacturer knows he has a good earth. As an installer I don’t have that info available to me so again, I’ll stick to a safe proven method and also again, if someone wishes to have the added advantage of using the body as an earth return, simply fit earth straps at both ends of the negative cable, then it won’t matter if there is any resistance in the body.
FollowupID:
441624
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:28
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 16:28
>if there is another path for the earth return that does not
>impose any resistance then there is no resistive point.
Every path which conducts current will provide some resistance, it's not a simple matter.
Mr Kirchoff "summed" :) it up nicely:
Site Link
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
441626
Follow Up By: Member - Garth J (NSW) - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 18:22
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 18:22
Mike,
Thanks for reminding me of Mr Kirchhoff.
I remember twenty years ago when I was doing circuit analysis and I got to know him very
well!!!!!!!!!
How soon we forget.....
For the record it's Kirchhoff....two h's...just read that in my old textbook.
Look what you've done to me! Now I'm reading about Thevenin, Norton and Millman.
God where's it gonna end.!!!!!!!!!!!
And i thought I'd never look at them again!!!! LOL
Thanks for bringing back some memories for me.
Hopefully I won't forget again.
Cheers
Garth
FollowupID:
441641
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 18:36
Sunday, Jul 23, 2006 at 18:36
!!
I had enough trouble with the bloody maths! How could I possibly handle the spelling too!!?? :)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Kirchhoff
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
441643
Reply By: Member - Mike DID - Monday, Jul 24, 2006 at 14:06
Monday, Jul 24, 2006 at 14:06
Here's a practical test - from the Rear Right of an NP current model Pajero - the resistance from the Third-
seat mount, to the battery negative was the same as 4 Gauge wire. i.e. if I ran 8 Ga wire I would have 2.5 times the voltage drop !
Here's the theory - steel has resistivity ten times that of copper, so there must be ten times as much steel as a 4 Gauge wire - 21 sq mm.
Here's the industry practice - everything except Starter Motor and Alternator are earthed via the bodywork - even the Rear Window demister that draws 10 amps.
Reliability of connections to the body can be a problem - which most probably accounts for the "it doesn't work" stories. For any holes that go through to the outside and may get wet, cover the joints in paint or Lanolin Graese to prevent corrosion which will quickly turn a good joint into a nightmare.
Mike
AnswerID:
185026