GU Patrols ZD30

Submitted: Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 14:47
ThreadID: 36239 Views:9967 Replies:10 FollowUps:25
This Thread has been Archived
With the ZD30 Nissan motor, have they solved the problems with the oil system. Cooking the pistons and so forth. Did the 2002 series 3 have these problems or was it only the 2000, 2001 problem?
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Grizzle - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 15:23

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 15:23
There is a survey on the Patrol Forum website www.patrol4x4.com/forum

Good luck

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 185853

Reply By: Notso - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:46

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:46
The 2000, had all the problems so they say, but there is still the odd failure with the later ones. My june 2000 build has done 180,000 and is doing nicely. You just don't know what is causing it. No-one at Nissan wants to let on.

AnswerID: 185883

Reply By: Trevor R (QLD) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:55

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:55
Wasn't there a thread on here just last week about a 2003 going bang??? I may be wrong but I do seem to recall something like that. About 130 000km on the clock.
I am sure the archives here will tell a tale or two.....if you have the time to read through them all.

Trevor.
AnswerID: 185887

Reply By: blown_zd30 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 19:01

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 19:01
Despite being fastiduously maintiained, my April 2001 Build Series II with ZD30 went bang at 244,000klms. At least 2 cracks in every piston, nice hole in No.3 and the head was cracked in 8 places. From what I have read on this forum and others is that to date there have been no reports of Series III ZD30's busting pistons. When I called Nissan HO to find out when they fixed the problem, all they would say is and I quote "over the life of any engine, we always make improvements"
AnswerID: 185888

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:14

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:14
>>> From what I have read on this forum and others is that to date there have been no reports of Series III ZD30's busting pistons.

You need to look more... there was an 03 as posted above you, and about 4 other in last 6 mths - remembering that the % of owners on this forum to the real world is tiny, so you wont hear of them all..
0
FollowupID: 442832

Follow Up By: Member - Axle - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:14

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:14
And your reply was?? Don"t say It!
0
FollowupID: 442833

Reply By: scottcamp - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:45

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:45
Hi Guys,
From the survey results which have been running on a few forums it is clear there was no specific cutoff date for the early engine. It seems that there was series of mods which have reduced the fail rate and this was on a continuous basis. It looks like some early built(not registered as this could be much later) 2003 models had the older engine.

When the problem came to light the early 2000 failures were failing mid 2001. If we work back the way we should be seeing 2004/05 models failing but as yet none. Still a sad state of affairs but hopefully mid/late 2003 onwards are fine. But only time will tell. Plus you also have to take into account that any time a ZD30 fails everyone will shout, told you so, when indeed it might be nothing to do with the early failures. Lets just see if we get any significant number of 2003 fails as yet only 1 first hand.
AnswerID: 185903

Follow Up By: Member - Axle - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:28

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:28
ONLY one,!! Then their is the posibilityof more?, that you have not heard of?,

SO the problem is still there, Why don't you just admit for once and for all (followed your original Enquiry into these engines) that ALL these 3.0 l Nissan engines are very very FRAGILE in reliability terms?.

Cheers Axle
0
FollowupID: 442847

Follow Up By: Gu_Patrol - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:32

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:32
I knows of a 2002 series 3 in Mount Gambier had a head replaced at 110,000 just out of warrenty, Nissans offered to pay for parts while owner paid for labour, It still cost him $1800 just to change the valves and stuff over, and it's still not running smooth.
0
FollowupID: 442848

Follow Up By: scottcamp - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:41

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:41
Hi Axle,
I'm with you on that. After doing all the work on the survey i would be stupid to say there is not a problem with the ZD30. I have my doubts as well, but only time will tell. I do find it worrying that we are still hearing of later fails, but i will point out that the late fails are very small in number compared to the early models. I hope Nissan has fixed the engine, but we can speculate all day about this, only time will tell. We should be seeing some very high mileage ZD30 appearing. One thing that still never ever came out of the survey was, why some engines and not others. There are lots of ZD30 engines with 300,000 Km on the clock. I looked for a pattern to the early fails but there was none. Some were ex police etc some were well maintained with good oil. We will never know the answer but only time will tell if the engine is fixed.
0
FollowupID: 442849

Follow Up By: Member - Axle - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27
Scott camp.

Did not really mean a personal attack on you, but this bloodynissan thing just goes on &on, you have no doubt been more frustrated than anyone, and its a crying shame Nissan have pushed the problem under the carpet, so to speak.

Probably when the next model is released both the 4.2& 3.0L will be replaced with a new generation hi tech engine with no probs !! ( Well you never know)

Axle
0
FollowupID: 442859

Reply By: hamradio_1 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27
As a owner from new of a 3lt 2000 patrol 98k from new(also my father in law did owned a 2000 now has a 05 model. I beleived that the oil problem was only one small issue but the pots burning out were cause by a faulty air mass sensor which caused the engine to over fuel and burn out the pots the air mass sensor failure was fixed on the later models. ALSO please note that Nissan has changed the oil spec for the ZD30 motor as they are still having engine failure due to oil issues (or as they think)

Below is a service bulletin from Nissan.

First Published: 30th September 2004
Bulletin No: MAO4-001
Re: Revised Engine Oil Specification
Applied Model: Y61 & D22
Applied range: ZD3O Engines

Please be advised that the specification for the 011 fill on the ZD30 has been revised. Engine Oils that meet the specification listed below are the only oils that are permitted for use in the ZD30 Engine. 011 Specification: ACEA 83 or JASO DH.1. Nissan strongly recommend that a viscosity rating of 10W40 be used. For specific viscosity relating to ambient temperature ranges please refer to the viscosity chart in the relevant workshop manual.

Note: API CG-4 0118 must never be used In the ZD30 engine.
To support the revision in oil specification, Nissan has developed a
semi-synthetic 10W-40 engine oil that meets all the operational demands of this engine. The revision of the new oil specification is retrospective and will apply to all ZD30 engines.

The oil will be available from Nissan Parts & Accessories in 51t and 200lt Quantities using the following part numbers.
51t- B3005-10W40PK
2001t- B3200..10W40PK

Authorised by:
R Bahn
Manager. Engineering Support
National Service & Engineering Department

NISSAN MOTOR GO.
Locked Bag 1450. Dandenong South, VIC, :3154 Phone. (03) 97974111 Fax. (03) 97974400
AnswerID: 185915

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:39

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:39
>>> but the pots burning out were cause by a faulty air mass sensor which caused the engine to over fuel and burn out the pots the air mass sensor failure was fixed on the later models.

Theres another so called excuse to add to the list ROTFLMAO!
0
FollowupID: 442980

Follow Up By: Leroy - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:36

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:36
yeh of course you're right trucky. Nothing happens for a reason.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 443042

Reply By: brian - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:13

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:13
Our local ARB outlet advises that penrite 5-40 oil be used for 3l patrols,other info apch4/sl HPR diesal5,it would seem different to nissans buliten ..any advice please...
AnswerID: 185950

Follow Up By: 3.0turbob - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:19

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:19
Go with the Nissan recommendation as above.
0
FollowupID: 442895

Reply By: yakodi - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:57

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:57
yes, I am one of the many who have had this problem - only a fortnight ago, 2 holed pistons. well serviced, 130000km, late 2002 model GU, as they say there is no substitiure for cubes, if it was a BMW they would have got rid of the Nissan 3L eons ago. Will hopefully have it back on the rd in the next fortnight. Will see how it goes, but if happens in the next 100000km will probably put a chev in it - otherwise i am happy with the cars set up for touring. Its just unfortunate that we knew about the early 3.0L GU problems, and that is why didn't buy an early model. But it will continue until they replace the small GU engine. Never again, and I will not be encouraging anyone to buy a 3L GU.
AnswerID: 185958

Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:22

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:22
Are you wearing the entire cost or is Nissan paying any of it?
VKS737 - Mobile 6352 (Selcall 6352)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 442912

Follow Up By: yakodi - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:17

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:17
I am unfortunately paying 50 % labour 50% parts - asked for trade price & reduced labour cost - as known problem, who knows how i'll go. I questioned the problems about paying half labour as it could be different elsewhere - but they say they are allocated so many hours for the job. Heading up the east coast this september - hopefully no engine failure off the beaten track??? Might trade it in QLD before heading up the cape.
0
FollowupID: 443102

Reply By: blown4by - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 13:41

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 13:41
G'Day Garry78. I am not sure of the exact production date that the early ZD30 problems were addressed by Nissan as I have a series 4. Before purchasing my vehicle I was aware of the ZD30 history and researched technical information from all sorts of places before weighing up all the pros and cons and deciding to go the ZD30 route. Why would I buy a 4.2L that has less torque, less horsepower, is gutless to drive and uses more fuel? In précis the early ZD30 problems have been caused by the piston cooling under-crown oil spray nozzles being incorrectly installed in production and Nissan fitting the wrong dipsticks that were too long resulting in insufficient oil capacity as well as some turbo over boosting caused by faulty/dirty mass air flow sensors causing the variable vane turbo provide more boost than actually required with the first warning of this problem being air intake hoses blowing off. To date mine has run like a bird and on a recent 3000km return trip from my home south of Perth to Onslow taking 14.5 hours each way including fuel and comfort stops (the dog has a weak bladder:-) it returned an average 22.8mpg as it consistently does "around town" in between trips. Through my work I see many ZD30 Patrols every day and always make a point of asking how they are performing and when driving in outback WA you will see literally 1000's of them from all parts of Aus and I would estimate the ZD30 Patrol outnumbers most other makes by about 2 to 1. Sure some have had problems as have many of the other big name diesel engines if you talk to service personnel that are engaged in repairing them but it is important get to get the full story. Some I have heard of were using the "bolt-on" computer chip upgrades to improve power which obviously interferes with the engine management systems controlling fuel/air ratios and turbo boost etc. Others as can be seen almost daily on this forum believe their lubrication engineering ability is superior to that of the engine manufacturer and choose to run an engine oil that is different and in some cases against the Nissan recommendation. As far as ill informed comments go regarding the engine being not up to the job due to it it's size and being a 4 cylinder it seems odd that plenty of others are around including Prado, Hi-Lux, Pajero, Terracan, Landrover, Rodeo, Triton, Challenger but then I suppose manufacturers like Toyota, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Isuzu & L/Rover are only small backyard operators aren't they? I will now await the deluge from the "experts".
AnswerID: 185974

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:41

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:41
>>> Why would I buy a 4.2L that has less torque, less horsepower, is gutless to drive and uses more fuel?

Because it will do 700,000 standing on its head... no problems..
0
FollowupID: 442982

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:52

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 19:52
In addition to what Truckster just said, I would add that you need to drive both types before making any statements about power and torque.

Nissan's claimed figures for both motors may possibly be correct in the laboratory etc, but in the real world when you're chugging up sand dune after sand dune, or climbing various tracks in the Vic High Country, I think you'd soon see the merits of the old 4.2 will out-weigh the flighty, bubbly 3L jobbie hands down.

There are blokes on this forum who have had both and they would not go back to a 3L after having changed over to the 6 pot unit.

Cheers

Roachie
0
FollowupID: 442986

Follow Up By: Member - Axle - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:20

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:20
Roachie.

I"ts been stated that many times" there"s no substitute for cubic inches.....Or as my Missus has stated ...... Inches will do!!.

Cheers Axle.
0
FollowupID: 442989

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:27

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:27
I'm worried about you Axle ol' mate....hahahahaha (I bet your missus is even more worried!!!!! hahahahaha).

Anyway you're right about the cubes.......classic example was when we went across the Simpson last year. My mate Pud in his slush-box 3L, towing a TrakShak, had to be snatched over the last several meters of one particular dune....but I just "grunted" it over towing my Ultimate (about the same weight).

We both had our tyre pressures down to about 18psi.

HooRoo mate

Roachie
0
FollowupID: 442992

Follow Up By: Pavo - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:37

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:37
I drive a 2.5 Turbo deisel and agree with you, blown4by, that small engines don't always explode just because they're in a big car...but I have to agree with Truckster and Roachie on this point - the quoted power and torque figures of an engine are not an accurate indicator of driveability. One engine might have lower 'peak' figures - but it's just that - a 'peak' figure. Those brochures should really quote the figure at say 100rpm intervals to give a better indication. And even this isn't that great. Gearing has a huge impact too...
0
FollowupID: 442994

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:41

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:41
I actually think its more people defending their purchases.

or a lot of

0
FollowupID: 442995

Follow Up By: Member - Pesty (SA) - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:43

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 20:43
Is there a problem with these ZD30 motors Roachie??? hahahahaha what a joke!
Nissan should be ashamed to still be putting them into anything
Seems to me the only reason the later ones havent blown is because they just havent done enough k's, give em time!

Pesty
0
FollowupID: 442996

Follow Up By: Member - Axle - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 21:15

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 21:15
Truckster! "you make me laugh" ( Favourite quote from an old aunt of mine)

That guy with head in the sand!! A Nissan 3.0l would blow four pots pulling him out!!

Axle.
0
FollowupID: 443004

Follow Up By: Patrol_Driver - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:06

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:06
To quote the NRMA recovery guy at Nyngan after he winched by 2003 GUIII 3.0Tdi onto his flatbed when it lost a rear wheel: "I've towed more of these bloody 3.0L Nissans than any other 4WD on the Barrier Hwy". I enquired as to what the problem was and he said engine seizure. He doesn't know the reason for the problem, he just picks them up and deposits them at a repairer.

It's given me food for thought, and I'm now trying to figure out what real options I have, a Toyotal Diesel is way too expensive for me.
0
FollowupID: 443064

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:00

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:00
pesty..
Whats worse is that this is the last run of 4.2's... this model is the last.... its scarey to think of what computerized hunk of crap is to come, probably a 1ltr with 1200kw at the wheels, and 2000nm, and everyone will be beating off at it going 'it looks bleep ing bleep hot on paper, I gotta get me one.. small engines with big cars are the way to go'....

Another reason I updated now, should get another 600,000 out of mine, which will do me.. by then we will all be driving hover cars, and there will be nowhere to wheel...
0
FollowupID: 443094

Reply By: datto311 - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:01

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 18:01
so what are the real numbers??

Going on publicly available numbers, there are something like 45,000 Patrols out there built from 2000 on. Assuming 70% are 3L that means about 30,000.

I know one is too many and obviously the 2000/2001 had problems but lets be scientific about this. Looking at genuine reported incidents (ie first hand not my brothers mate type stories) on this website and others we are not talking large numbers. Assuming not everbody who has problems will report it on a website we are probably talking in the hundreds, Australia wide.

Yes I own a 3l Patrol and no I do not have my head in the sand
AnswerID: 186093

Follow Up By: Pavo - Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 20:42

Sunday, Jul 30, 2006 at 20:42
I'm not usually intersted in taking part of this usual 3L debate, and only read this posts out of interest in 4wds.

But using your own maths and stats, datto311. 30,000 3L patrols in 6.5 years. That's about 5,000 per year (give or take). You say the 2000/2001 had problems and go on to mention "we are talking in the hundreds Australia wide". Say 200 out of the 10,000 odd sold in 2000/2001??? That's 2%. Pretty high failure rate. Let's half that to 1% to be safe...still a huge number.

I have no idea of the failure rate and would bet it's no where near as high as 2%...but your post suggests it's pretty high!

When you start your post "so what are the real numbers" you should actually produce the 'real numbers'.

I agree that the 3L problem may be over exagerated, but your numbers leave a lot to be desired... :)

0
FollowupID: 443155

Follow Up By: datto311 - Monday, Jul 31, 2006 at 13:11

Monday, Jul 31, 2006 at 13:11
I'm with you, I don't usually come into the debate, but I was just trying to introduce some science and help people realise it is an exagerated problem.

I was hoping somebody from a club would have some more substantive data.

Real numbers are the problem. I don't think anybody apart from Nissan knows exactly how many have failed.

Here are the real numbers I have collected.

I have looked at 2 websites. This one and the Patrol 4wd/GU forums. There are many sites out there but there appears to be a level of duplication with the same problem being reported on more than one site. So I limited myself to the two previously mentioned. There are 35 first hand reports on this website (give or take a couple). There are 22 on the Patrol4wd poll.

Therefore I have assumed a quatrter of the people who have had problems have posted to the 2 websites I have sampled. This is very arbitary. I don't know what it is really, is 10% is it 50%?? Only Nissan would know.

According to the vFacts website, 8633 patrols were sold in 2000, and 8255 in 2001. So that means approx 12,000 Patrols (70% of 16,800) in the danger zone. So on the data, the failure rate could range from .5% to 5%

No more from me on this topic

Thanks for reading

Noel
0
FollowupID: 443295

Follow Up By: GUPatrol - Tuesday, Aug 01, 2006 at 16:58

Tuesday, Aug 01, 2006 at 16:58
Noel,

In our club:

There are 20 Patrols

4.2 TD number= 7
2.8 TD number= 4
4.5 Petrol number= 3
3.0L TD number= 6

Failed 3.0L Patrols with holed pistons within our club= 2 (these are first hand within our club not the son of my uncle's friend....)
0
FollowupID: 443594

Follow Up By: Leroy - Tuesday, Aug 01, 2006 at 17:05

Tuesday, Aug 01, 2006 at 17:05
And what year are the vehicles? 2000-01? We all now they have problems

leroy
0
FollowupID: 443597

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)