Thursday, Aug 10, 2006 at 18:25
My experience with NCOPs in other areas is that they aren't law unless adopted as a standard in each state.
The NCOP in this case is very prescriptive which provides the basis for standards to be drawn up.
Where I have had input into COPs elsewhere I have tried to steer away from prescriptiveness and focussed on outcomes.
It would be an interesting question to ask as to who was consulted in compiling this COP as it appears that not many 4WDers were consulted.
What is the real outcome being sought?
is there any evidence that completely legal (engineered) vehicles are any less safe than any other?
Is it really that there are many modified vehicles around that don't have appropriate certification? are they any less safe?
I think we all know the answers here and they have been said here and in other forums. It's not about reflecting fact, it is about policing the many for the sins of very few.
NickR
Won't the ATECO be dull when these standards are applied!!!
FollowupID:
445642