Death roll warning on 4WDs

Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:10
ThreadID: 36994 Views:2665 Replies:9 FollowUps:17
This Thread has been Archived
link text

Leroy
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Mike Harding - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:14

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:14
From the link:

"It found drivers of four-wheel-drives are more likely to be
involved in a rollover crash on high-speed roads compared
with other drivers, and 3.4 times more likely to die."

Let's see... tall vehicle, high centre of gravity, heavy, crap handling, hmmmmm...?

I am reminded of Basil Fawlty's comment regarding his wife:

"Cybil Fawlty, welcome to Mastermind - special subject The Bleedin' Obvious".

Mike Harding

AnswerID: 190258

Follow Up By: Robin - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:20

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:20
This is a major reason why you should consider a patrol, stability.

They are they only vehicle of this type that can claim a tilt table angle of 48 degrees (cruiser 45) and also have a long wheelbase such that the surface area of their wheelbase X track over the external dimensions is a greater proportion.

All adds up to lowest roll centre.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 447916

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:22

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:22
Not to mention that fact that more 4wd's are in country areas on bad roads at high speed than sedans.

How likely are you to roll your dunnydore driving through the suburbs at 50km/hr?

Now how likely are you to roll your 4wd with loaded roofrack at 110km/hr when you're driving on poorly maintained roads out bush?

Not really a suprise is it...
0
FollowupID: 447918

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:24

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:24
Over the years I've driven just about everything from heavy vehicles to motor cycles, each of those has it's positives and negatives but each should be driven within it's limitations ie don't try and drive a semi trailer rig like a sports car. The problem is not with the vehicle it's with the drivers.

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 447919

Follow Up By: Robin - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:36

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:36
The drivers can only be responsible to a certain degree which includes there ability to understand the issue.

Cars or anything that goes out of the norm causes increased risk.

Hence so many deaths and increased damage in some types of vechiles
and choosing the right vehicle gives and increased margin of saftey.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 447922

Follow Up By: Member - Boo Boo (NSW) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:14

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:14
Now Robin we are not a patrol salesman are we? LOL

Regards Bob
0
FollowupID: 447929

Follow Up By: scoof - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:16

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:16
Come on Guy's, that keeped a couple shiny bums busy for a couple years (i suppose) , now we know the all about the " Bleedin Obvious ".
Scoof
0
FollowupID: 447930

Follow Up By: Robin - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:18

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:18
I must be Bob, I only gave half the story - thinner metal panels than there main rival keeps the centre of gravity lower as well , and so contributes to more panel dents from stones.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 447932

Follow Up By: Kiwi Kia - Wednesday, Aug 23, 2006 at 16:06

Wednesday, Aug 23, 2006 at 16:06
A tilt table is a static test and does NOT take into account the "flexability" (or otherwise) of a live suspension. It does not automatically follow that the highest tilt table rating equates to the greatest on-road stability.
0
FollowupID: 448195

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:42

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:42
was that exact same dribble released 2-3 times already this yeara?
AnswerID: 190263

Reply By: Robin - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:55

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:55
Mobs like RACV annoy me on points like this - as they are one of the groups
that dropped the ball or vehicle stability.

I still have early 90's RACV mags in which they did many 4wd tests and included
tilt table figures.

Cost cutting probably stopped them taking cars to Puckapunyal test grounds and
figures stopped appearing on new cars.

You can't even get proper data from 4wd mags either - they stick more to how much leather trim , how many chrome buttons they have and wether the CD skips.

Robin Miller

AnswerID: 190265

Reply By: TerraFirma - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:56

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:56
bleep ..! Ad to the fact that I drive a "ROLLUX" and youd better be careful..!
AnswerID: 190267

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:58

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 14:58
As bad as a VW beetle?
0
FollowupID: 447924

Follow Up By: TerraFirma - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:00

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:00
As bad as a VW Beetle..?? Not sure Truckster, I don't intend to find out...!
0
FollowupID: 447925

Reply By: Footloose - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:12

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:12
Might I suggest that it's a timely warning that in some circumstances we wouldn't be safer in an accident in our 4wd than if we were in a car ?

Highlighting such issues can't be bad if it causes us to drive a bit more carefully; better yet, if it helps to make the next generation of 4wds a bit safer becuse the manufacturers have redesigned some aspects ?
AnswerID: 190271

Follow Up By: Leroy - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:19

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:19
'occupants of four-wheel-drives are five times less likely to die in head-on collisions'
A good point for a change.
Leroy
0
FollowupID: 447933

Follow Up By: Footloose - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 17:26

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 17:26
I wonder if that holds true for hitting a stationary (and unmoveable) object, or a larger vehicle ? (truck ?)
0
FollowupID: 447963

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:18

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:18
Yep,
Seems to be the season for rollovers.
I've pulled two vehicles back onto their wheels in the past 8 months. In addition I've got two friends who have rolled their 4wds with their kids in the backseat.

These rollovers happened on Rawlinna-Cocklebiddy rd, Birdsville-Betoota Rd, Tanami Track and Anne Beadell Hwy. Drivers were aged 32, 46,48 and 70. All were unpleasant and scary experiences, but fortunately no serious injuries.
AnswerID: 190275

Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:24

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:24
Phil,

Out of interest,what do you think caused the roll overs?
In my experience, on the road or track, it is usually (but not always) one of three things.

1. turning too sharply, too much speed for the corner
2. swerving to miss something on a straight road (similar to 1)
3. tyre blowout/sudden loss of pressure.

Off road add a few more things.
0
FollowupID: 447939

Follow Up By: Robin - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:45

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:45
In one I was involved with Oldplodder the car immediately behind me rolled on
basically a straight road.

All seemed innocent enough.

It was red clay surface, dry as we started and drizzle began and
the road slowly became more slippery.

The lead car was a long wheelbase patrol,like mine and wasn't
having much trouble.
I noticed that I had to pay more attention to the driving
but the "Rocky" behind me was finding the going a lot
harder and made a slight over correction which lead to
another and a rollover.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 447946

Follow Up By: Member - Mike DID - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:49

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:49
. . . .add to that poor packing causing unnecessarily high Centre of Gravity - putting heavy things in the roofrack, rather down low e.g. water, fuel, spare tyre .
0
FollowupID: 447947

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:52

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 15:52
Oldplodder, you are really close to the mark!

The rawlinna one was in wet weather, greasy track, 40kph, and the landcruiser went sideways after hitting a wombat hole in the track; rear tyre off the rim and it fell on its side.

The Birdsville one was good gravel road, Landcruiser at 80kph, over a crest, may have been on the wrong side of the road, oncoming vehicle, overcorrected, spun around, and fell onto its side in a ditch. Electric windows and central locking didn't help! Older age may have been a factor.

The tanami one was a combination of speed, high tyre pressure, rear tyre blowout and the Disco rolled. Family inside - eventually got out. Continued their holiday in a resort in Broome, while vehicle shipped back.

The anne Beadell one was a Defender pulling campertailer , and I don't have more detail except that it rolled twice.

Yeah, different factors for offroad - others seem to be due to speed on gravel roads.
0
FollowupID: 447948

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 16:29

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 16:29
.....and the most obvious factor of all, driver fatigue.
0
FollowupID: 447954

Reply By: Groove - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 16:00

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 16:00
Problem with most modern four wheel drives is that they drive and handle too well. A mate bought a new Prado recently ( frist 4x4 ever) and we went for a spin. He kept comenting on how well it handled, just like a car etc etc, he drove it just like a car too, cornering far too fast for my comfort level. I tried to tell him, high centre of gravity etc, built for comfort not speed etc, not too interested. Then he asked me for a few pointers on drving off road...mmmmmm
AnswerID: 190286

Reply By: Pajman Pete (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 17:13

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2006 at 17:13
When the Army first got the Perentie land rovers (110 with Isuzu diesel) they had a rash of roll overs. Drivers converting from the Series 3 would end up driving a lot faster as the vehicle was much quieter and handled better and they would exceed the safe speed on poor roads and put the shiny side down.

You had to get your military licence endorsed to drive the new LR. They were fun to punt around in though. We took 3 from Darwin to Wadeye, the back road to Daly River Crossing, then down the jump up to Timber Creek, out though Jasper Gorge, VRD Station then across the gibbers to Kulkaringi. The home on the black top. Apart from a few tyres it was a trouble free trip and the landies took us everywhere.
AnswerID: 190309

Reply By: Barnesy - Wednesday, Aug 23, 2006 at 16:29

Wednesday, Aug 23, 2006 at 16:29
This information may be old news to people who use this site. But the facts that i've read is that about 80% of fwd's never leave the bitumen. These people come from driving commodores, buy a prado or cruiser and go driving as normal. These inexperienced people probably are unaware of these facts and need their eyes opened.

It is these same people who are most probably the ones getting up the noses of drivers of small cars in cities. Not being aware of other drivers, bullying them etc.

I hate to say it but my brother recently bought his first fourby and takes delight in bullying smaller cars on the road with his spotlights, bull bar etc.

Some just don't get it.

Barnesy
AnswerID: 190546

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)