Help keep the bush open

Submitted: Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 16:53
ThreadID: 37134 Views:1786 Replies:3 FollowUps:2
This Thread has been Archived
It is no good sitting at home and whingeing on here that you cant go here and you cant go there, get off you backside and help

Bush User Groups and individuals are invited to take part in the protest rally along the Main Street of Koondrook to Apex Park. Everyone to assemble at the vacant block adjacent to the Historic Red gum bridge over the Gunbower Creek at 12 noon on Sunday 5th November.
• If you have had enough of this government fencing off Victoria for the greens.
• If you are sick of seeing wildlife devastated by feral cats, wild dogs, foxes and wildfires.
• If you are fed up with the way honest, hardworking Australians are being treated.
“We need to unite so that our Country Voice can be heard above the green machine”
Contact/Register/Information: Audrey- 03 54871250 email: audrydic@bordernet.com.au
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Shaker - Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 17:41

Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 17:41
Sorry, but I protest when I vote.

Hopefully a lot of people are rueing the day that they voted for Honest Steve.
AnswerID: 191147

Reply By: Member - Chris R (NSW) - Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 19:53

Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 19:53
Nice one Cabbageoz. They (our elected representativs and their nameless ideologues) do this sort of stuff by 'local consultation'. But alas most of us aren't local to where the closures occur. So NPWS runs with considerable freedom - until we protest every time we have the opportunity.

I don't really think the ballot box sends any worthwhile message - too much other noise in the system and each party is only interested in one thing - 51% at best (any more is waste). Am I being too cynical??

Chris
AnswerID: 191170

Follow Up By: cabbageoz - Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 21:53

Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 21:53
As much as I am not a fan of cut & paste this bit had to be done that way
This is just a little part of the story but this bloke has been fined heaps had to almost $7000 on trees, has lost the use of the area and had $30,000 knocked of the price of his farm because of the trees. If he doesn't conform he goes to jail.

Ms Jubb-Stoney said the laws were so draconian they had all but
reduced land ownership to a titular form of ownership where owners
maintained title and the right to pay land tax and rates
but effectively ceased being the proprietors of their property.

"It hasn't quite got to that point yet but it's heading in that
direction very quickly," she said.

Last week Ms Jubb-Stoney visited the property of Nathalia dairy
farmer, Ian Kuster, who has been ordered by Moira Shire to plant more
than 1000 trees to replace 28 storm damaged and diseased
eucalypts he cut down recently.

"I believe the farmer acted in good faith in removing trees which were a danger to stock and to humans. He should certainly not be forced to plant a thousand trees for removing 28."
0
FollowupID: 448906

Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 22:51

Saturday, Aug 26, 2006 at 22:51
I am not going to indulge and paste up the Liberal policy to free up the red tape cabbageoz but needless to say it is to remove the problems farmers are having with the regulations you talk about. You can't even cut some firewood from a tree over your fence legitimately now.

One other thing they are promising is $ millions to repair the fire tracks so that fires can be again fought. They have been apparetly working with the Four Wheel Drive Association in Victoria to provide for future access. That should be great for High Country access if they are elected.
0
FollowupID: 448915

Reply By: Barnesy - Sunday, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:19

Sunday, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:19
I agree that the NP&WS aren't managing parks as well as they could, probably all over the country. I would be careful though about what you're protesting about. If the parks are opened too much they turn into tourist areas and lose their wilderness appeal. It's all too easy for this to happen. Allowing access should be done carefully to protect the integrity of the place, the whole reason enthusiasts go to these areas.

As to land holders complaining about having to plant trees, they have to move with the times. It's in the best interests of land holders to have trees on their properties. There is enough proof around that they reduce erosion, protect topsoil and provide a wind break from strong winds sweeping across the land damaging crops. What one landholder does affects neighbouring properties.
AnswerID: 191217

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)