Trying to choose a 4WD - need opinions from owners :)
Submitted: Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:35
ThreadID:
37324
Views:
6084
Replies:
17
FollowUps:
36
This Thread has been Archived
dennisV
Hi all,
After doing some research of my own and some test drives, I've narrowed down my options to 3 cars (
well, 4), and wanted to see if owners of any of these vehicles can give me an insight on good and bad sides of each. I'd really appreciate it :)
So, I'm choosing between (all new):
- Nissan Pathfinder Ti 2.5 Diesel
- Jeep Commander Limited 3.0 Diesel
- Mitsubishi Pajero Exceed 2.8 Diesel
- Toyota Prado Grande 3.0 Petrol
The car needs to accommodate up to 4 adults at times, plus 2 large Labradors, so I cannot buy anything smaller than the ones above. I need a 7-seater.
I don't do any offroading at the moment, but do plan to start going off the bitumen more and more once I get an appropriate car, but most of the driving will be to and from work, so it has to be comfortable :) I would rate comfort being the most important feature with off-road capability being somewhere below on my list of priorities. All of them are automatic.
Frankly, at the moment, I'm more inclined towards the Nissan and Jeep, with Nissan losing it a bit because the 2nd row seats seemed small and uncomfortable to me, but Jeep losing a bit because it's 10K dearer in price (RRP anyway).
Are there any known cons of those vehicles?
Thank you in advance for any insights and suggestions you might offer.
Reply By: strzelecki - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:50
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:50
Nissan and jeep do seem to have an issue regards number of faults and quality control etc, that alone would make them the last choice in my mind,resale value springs to mind.
AnswerID:
192212
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:02
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:02
Thank you for the comment - I'm not worried much about resale value at the moment, as I do plan to keep this car for at least 5 years and then we'll see what happens. I thought Nissans were quite good on quality with their Patrols?
FollowupID:
450110
Follow Up By: DMH122 - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:27
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:27
Hi strelecki , i am interested in on your comment about pathfinder faults & quality control. If u could supply more info thankyou.
FollowupID:
450136
Follow Up By: chump_boy - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:38
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:38
He is probably referring to the tow bar issue mentioned in the last week or so..
FollowupID:
450149
Follow Up By: strzelecki - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:39
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:39
Patrols not a prob,excluding the 3lt.Navara I bought a new one 2002 and could not get rid of it fast enough.Pathfinder just from what i have read they have had a few issues,do a search.Maybe only some early production gremlins but still a pita if its your vehicle and nissan don't have an envious rep for customer/product service from my observations and dealings.Obviously some dealers try harder than others.
FollowupID:
450150
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:57
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:57
I agree about the dealers - some can be better some worse, but if the car is good then this shouldn't be a problem :) I'll try to find out if those early problems have been fixed (if there was an update to the Pathfinders). Thanks!
FollowupID:
450156
Follow Up By: DMH122 - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:59
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:59
HI Guys i was just curious as i am a nissan tech & have found the pathfinder to be problem free in our d/ship, also surprised to hear strzelecki comments about the nav i used to own a 04 str, loved it, maybe it is just some dealers. But hey this is the real world we live in & bleep happens.
FollowupID:
450202
Reply By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:52
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:52
Can not really help you, my car is too old.
But a couple of questions and comments if you don't mind.
Is the pajero a 2.8 or 3.2?
I think the 2.8 was last sold new in 2002/2003?
Others will have more info, but I think there is a new pajero being released towards the end of the year (new body and 3.2 with common rail?), and an uprated diesel for the Prado too this year.
So go for the current model expecting a discount, or wait for the new models?
Others might have info on the timing.
AnswerID:
192213
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:00
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:00
Sorry for the confusion, the Pajero is in fact a 3.2.
I spoke to a Mitsu dealer and they said that the new model is not due till Jan-Feb 2007, and they don't have any info, not brochures - nothing. It might be worthwhile to wait a bit, but then again, maybe not?
Thanks for the input!
FollowupID:
450107
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:20
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:20
I thought new models come out in August/September not earlier on in the year? (i may be wrong)
They never seem to commit to a timeframe for the new models yet, due to them wanting a sale NOW! Doesn't really matter which brand of vehicle, they all tend to do the same. The 2007 timeframe may be to scare you off waiting.....
My understanding is that it is being unvealed at the Paris Car show on 30 Sept.
Andrew
FollowupID:
450123
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:22
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:22
i just read oldplodders post and i may be wrong with the dates ;-)
Andrew
FollowupID:
450124
Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:47
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:47
Andrew,
I think you may be right.
.Release at the Paris auto show in Sept.
When in Oz I don't know.
Traditionally Mitsu release in oct, but may be late this year?
links to new model photos
Site Link
Site Link
FollowupID:
450132
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:48
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:48
Thank you for the info and the links - I like what I'm seeing! :) Unfortunately though it's really unknown at the moment (at least to me) when they'll be here and what the price would be. I'll try to talk to another dealer tomorrow about this and see if I can get any more info out of them. I could wait a bit if I knew what I was waiting for ;)
FollowupID:
450142
Reply By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:53
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 16:53
Just a quick question....Are you trying to compare new (or near new) vehicles here?
The reason i ask is that the Pajero model chosen (2.8l) is about 6 years out of date, even though you may be comparing this to the latest nissan diesel engine.
I would personally choose a vehicle with full independant
suspension for mainly on-road comfort and a live axle model for offroad benefits.
Andrew
AnswerID:
192214
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:01
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:01
Yes, sorry about that - I got confused. The Pajero is a 3.2. I'm looking for a new car.
Thanks for the suggestion - I'll keep it in mind when comparing them!
FollowupID:
450108
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:08
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:08
As you can see, i own a 3.2 pajero and found the ride on the best of most 4wds due to the independant
suspension all round.
A negative of the DiD pajero is that it is considered noiser than others due to the engine setup. As most people will say, you get use to it :-)
You will have a hard choice ahead of you ;-) Don't forget to look at issues such as spare parts costs, after-market accessories, resale, servicing costs/intervals, warranty lengths, etc.
HTHs
Andrew
FollowupID:
450116
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:13
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:13
Thanks Andrew - the Pajero was my no. 1 choice at one point and I'm still open to it :) I didn't realise it'd be so hard to choose - finding a suitable
sedan is so much easier.
I don't mind the noise - that's why there's a sound system :) I know a diesel will be noisiser than petrol, so it's something I can live with.
The Mitsus do have the best service interval and warranty, from what I gathered, so that's a plus :)
FollowupID:
450120
Reply By: Richard W (NSW) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 17:09
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 17:09
If you are loking for an all rounder and going "New" IMHO, the Pajero 3.2 DiD would be the pick of the bunch. Understand there is a new model out next year.
AnswerID:
192223
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:03
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:03
Yes, I did consider it, but the new model is not due till next year (that's what the dealer said anyway), so it might be too long for me :) I would prefer to get something before December. I appreciate the input, thanks!
FollowupID:
450111
Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 17:11
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 17:11
I would be looking at these two Jeep Commander Limited 3.0 Diesel
and Mitsubishi Pajero Exceed 2.8 Diesel but after I looked at the Landrover Discovery 3
AnswerID:
192226
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:04
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:04
Unfortunately the Disco3 is a bit our of my price range :( Thanks!
FollowupID:
450112
Reply By: PBob - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:09
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:09
Discovery 3
AnswerID:
192242
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:05
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:05
Thank you for the suggestion, but Disco3 is too expensive for me :( I need to fit within a 70K (or very close to it) budget.
FollowupID:
450115
Follow Up By: PBob - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 22:06
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 22:06
Check your dealer on Disco 3 - you can get an SE TDV6 for 70K on road, I am told.
FollowupID:
450147
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:59
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:59
I'll see if that's possible, but it seems more likely to be around 75K, which is over my budget, considering there're many options that cost a lot and are missing :(
FollowupID:
450157
Reply By: PatrolBen - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:16
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:16
Jeeps, tank too small and diesel untested, read latest 4WD Monthly
Pajero, looks like the proverbial
Latest Pathfinder, sure to die at an early age
Disco 3, again read 4wd Monthly as the electronic 'gremlins' still exist
Go the Grande, things like DAT and air-sus bleep ion will keep you grinnin for a long time. If looking for longevity and unkillable go the ST-L 4.2 Td-6 or go the Landcruiser 4.2Td.
wish I had to make such a choice.......
IMHO
AnswerID:
192245
Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:19
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 18:19
gee - how do you spell
suspension again?????
LOL
Cheers
Muddy
FollowupID:
450088
Follow Up By: Niffty - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 19:26
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 19:26
As long as you can spell bank manager and loan I would take any of the above.
Good luck choosing!
Niffty\
Perth
FollowupID:
450098
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:09
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 20:09
Thanks to all! :) Actually I didn't think of picking up a magazine yet :( I'll get one tomorrow. The Commander looks the best inside, IMHO... Why would the Pathfinder die? Aren't they supposed to be tough and
well-built?
The Patrol is out of my price range - I like the ST-L Diesel though... But I need to fit within 70K or very close to that (better less than that!). The Cruisers I like in their Sahara edition which is close to a 100K :(
Wish I had a spare 40K :)
FollowupID:
450117
Reply By: Member - Pesty (SA) - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:36
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:36
I would be going for the Pajero Deisel or the Prado Deisel, both good reliable vehicles.
Wouldnt touch a Jeep , send message to Member Lucy for a list of the problems, unless you have spare car in shed for when its in the dealers!
Cheers Pesty
AnswerID:
192277
Follow Up By: dennisV - Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:51
Friday, Sep 01, 2006 at 21:51
Thanks for the input! Those cars are both in the top price range (of the 4 models I'm considering), but then I'd rather spend a bit more now, but have something reliable and that I enjoy.
With the new model of Pajero coming out, it's interesting - you would think they'd have a run out sale sometime soon, perhaps :)
FollowupID:
450143
Reply By: chump_boy - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:41
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:41
I know you didn't mention it as an option, but the Landrover Defender could be an option, especially with the long-haired dogs in the back.
It is still a virtually hose out interior, but it is definitely not for everyone...
Cheers,
Chump
AnswerID:
192284
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:00
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:00
Thanks - I looked at the Defenders and eventhough it's a good tough car, the interior is, sorry, horrible :)
FollowupID:
450158
Follow Up By: chump_boy - Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 23:35
Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 23:35
Don't apologise - it aint much to look at!
FollowupID:
450425
Reply By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:34
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:34
Left of center entry: Hyundai Terracan turbodiesel.
You could buy two for the money you are looking at.
There is an increasing aftermarket for them.
They will do everything the other vehicles mentioned will do.
They fit you projected use for the vehicle (light/moderate 4WDing).
Good fuel economy
Decent towing ability.
AnswerID:
192295
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:03
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:03
I thought about a Hyundai, but not sure about their quality - I test drove a Tucson Elite a year ago when they first arrived and the plastic inside was constantly making squeaky noises. But the price is certainly very good :)
I might just take a Terracan for a test drive, can't hurt :)
FollowupID:
450159
Reply By: Member - TonyG (Qld) - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:46
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:46
Hi Dennis,
I am currently reviewing the same option, for wife's family run around car.
We currently have a Patrol as our camping & 4x4 car.
It will definitely be diesel, and I am considering the following:
Mitsubishi - best quality for money spent, ride quality is great. Should pay low $60's with ABN, maybe with a deal, get for high $50's
Pathfinder - I reckon too expensive for the quality you get. Should pay mid $50's with ABN
Prado - 2nd choice, more expensive than Mitsubishi, better off road. Should pay high $60's with ABN
Jeep - Personally I don't like them
Terrican - Great price for what you get, build quality below other cars, but I think good value for money. Should pay low $40's with ABN.
I will probably go with a Terrican only because of budget reasons.
But if money not so tight, and it was my daily drive car, I personally would pick the Mitsubishi. It is a 4x4 limousine
Hope this helps
TonyG
AnswerID:
192301
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:16
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:16
Thanks Tony!
I took a test drive in Jeep Commander Limited CRD 3.0 today and I really loved it :) I'm not sure about its build quality though, as I've seen some negative
feedback here and from other people as well, so this needs a bit more research - what's wrong and where.
The Pathfinders I have scratched from my list as of today, as the 2nd row seats are useless for adults. I've added the X-Trails though, as a replacement (they're almost the same size after all!). The X-Trail Ti would be my "budget" choice at the moment.
The only concern I have with the Mitsus is that they have a new model coming out really soon and I'd prefer to buy that then, but I couldn't get any specific details on the date nor the price, so it's a bit fuzzy...
FollowupID:
450198
Reply By: camship - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:23
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:23
After 5 years resale would be a major issue I would think.
I would choose prado for the following reasons;
Toyota reputation for quality and reliabilty.
Prado has far superior resale.
New Common rail will be a great engine for drivabilty and economy.
Grande has a massive range of features.
Pretty good offroad if not going over harsh terrain.
180lt fuel capacity = 1500plus ks to tank.
All the others you mention have dubious reputation and poor retained values.
The jeep is extremely weird looking and too expensive for what you get.
Land Rover probably is the better vehicle but has a horrible reputation for relaiblity .
Pathfinder just dissapears into the landscape, nobody seems to want them when second hand.
Pajero is not in the ballpark for the way they drive, and resale is poor again.
Think about this; Prado approx. 5 year resale about 55 - 60% Pajero approx 5 year resale about 45-50%
AnswerID:
192305
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 14:05
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 14:05
A vary biased opinion indeed.
The difference in 5 year resale value between the pajero and the grande would be around $7000 (less in some cases) if your figures are to be believed. However this would be negated to a huge extent by the fact that the difference in fuel consumption of these two vehicles would add up to 3100 litres plus in favour of the pajero using their quoted fuel economy numbers and averaging 25000km per year. (13.2 vs 10.7)
I'm not even sure where you are coming from when stating that "Pajero is not in the ballpark for the way they drive"........what is this based upon? Have you actually driven one and compared it to the others?
Why do "the others" have dubious reputations? Why should the new pathfinder dissapear into the landscape? There seems to be too many inconsistencies in the argument to say that the prado wins on almost all accounts.
If the jeep was extremely wierd looking, why do they sell them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Maybe not your cup of tea, however a poor reason to bag the vehicle. I think the front of the Prado looks wierd with its lights however it is not helpful for the OP to decide on the vehicle. The fact that they have listed these four vehicles means that the looks of it hasn't turned them off purchasing one.
Whilst i drive a pajero, i hate it when people promote false accusations. Each vehicle has its benefits and disadvantages, and you have to weigh up all factors to form a guided decision. I'm not saying that the prado may not be the best choice for the OP situation, just that the information you have provided is incorrect.
Andrew
FollowupID:
450170
Follow Up By: camship - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 16:09
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 16:09
Thank you Andrew.
All Im saying is what I would do.
I guess I get to see things from a different point of view, as a vehicle wholesaler I need to make wise descisions on buying and selling vehicle that are secondhand, looking at the second hand market objectivley is very important for anybody looking at buying a new vehicle.
Unfortunatley some dealers will not even take on their own products seconhand because they are incredibly difficult to resell, for varying reasons. Once a vehicle gets a bad reputation in this country, it tends to stick.
I have never had a problem trying to resell a Prado, Dealers in fact line up for them, and will pay very good money to get a good one. Its not the only car like that, but certainly compared to the others mentioned.
I dont dislike the Pajero at all, and its is not a bad vehicle to own. However my opinion on this topic is shared by many in the industry.
Cameron.
FollowupID:
450182
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 17:02
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 17:02
That's ok.......as a vehicle wholesaler, i would summise that you would be looking at the bottom dollar, buying low, selling high, sell quick :-) The value that the vehicle is sold for is higher on your priority rather than life cycle costs, though these costs do affect price in the end to some extent.
I would agree with you though that it would be easier for you to sell, say a prado, due to various reasons, however not necessarily due to "being a better ride" etc. Each owner is looking for different features, however i am always wary of people who try to sell you a product due to their belief that it is better (when really it is a matter of "i have this vehicle etc for sale"). I'm not saying your one of these people, as i don't know you :-)
thanks for your response,
Andrew
FollowupID:
450186
Follow Up By: Off-track - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 22:29
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 22:29
I dont think it was a biased opinion at all - and it certainly wasnt incorrect. Camship was offering one point to look at that he has experience with. Rightly or wrongly resale is a matter of varying importance to most buyers and can often sway them to a vehicle that was maybe second on their list. Certainly doesnt mean the best resale vehicle is the best vehicle but it is something to factor into your purchase.
BTW Ford Taurus was an UGLY car but they still sold (some). Good luck offloading one now.
FollowupID:
450241
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 06:56
Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 06:56
It was incorrect in the fact that several statements such as "Pajero is not in the ballpark for the way they drive" cannot not validated. Whilst i agree he is looking at it from one point, it would have been handy from the onset to understand where he was coming from. I do agree with your statements on resale though.
No thanks, i will pass on the Taurus :-)
Andrew
FollowupID:
450259
Follow Up By: Off-track - Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 22:39
Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 22:39
Yeah I agree with the Paj handling part - they definately sweet on the road with four wheel ind susp.
FollowupID:
450421
Reply By: Member - Rotord - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 13:54
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 13:54
Hello Dennis
Terracan is far superior to Tucson , worth a test drive . Reliability and build quality should relate to warrantee , and Hyundai has the most generous warrantee.
Another thought , if you choose a vehicle costing $10,000 less than your upper limit , what about investing $10,000 in oil stocks ? This could have you driving with free or highly subsidised petrol and you would be hedged against fuel cost rises . If you are going to borrow to finance the vehicle you can still invest in oil by borrowing [ or gearing] , talk to your financial advisor .
AnswerID:
192320
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 20:49
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 20:49
Hello!
Yes, I might give it a try after all.
It's so hard to choose something within a certain budget :(
Thanks for the suggestions!
FollowupID:
450222
Reply By: PatrolBen - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 17:50
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 17:50
I am not sure how I tried to type '
suspension' last night but thats what came out. The reason i say that the pathfinder is sure to die an early death is that one was stopped near my work the other day with the owner almost beside himself in it. It was the ST-L 2.5TD auto and the cause for it stopping was unknown but he had been accelerating from rest at a set of traffic lights when as the revs reached about 2500 there was a bang, cloud of white smoke out the back and a bad clanking/grinding sound from the engine. He immediatley pulled over, shut it down and called Nissan. The poor guy said he must have been cursed as this was the third time such a thing happened to him, the pathy having just 12,000 on the clock. His 2001 GU ST auto blew it first engine at 87000km and it second with the odo reading about 180000.
From what I have been told and seen I would not drive a nissan "high tech four cylinder european diesel" even around town, let alone risk it bush and having the grenades pin come out. After all trying to extract 128Kw and 403Nm out of only a 2.5l displacement, in my opinion, a problem waiting to happen.
Next vechile I buy will be a big 6-cyl turbo diesel that has a proven track record.
AnswerID:
192349
Reply By: lenni - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:57
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 18:57
Hi dennis
We have a Pajero 3.2 2005 model. We really harrowed over the choices and looked at everything.
I tell you the car is fantastic. We purchased the whits glx auto diesel( base model) and it has everything you could want. Crusie contol, comfort speed and power to burn and absolutely fantastic economy. We have done 40,000 km in just over a year and not a problem! Warranty is good and so is the service interval though we change the oil in between ourselves. We have done a lot of driving and it is an absolute pleasure to drive this car. I have never driven a 4x4 diesel with so much power for such good economy. I have had 3 speeding tickets since the purchase
( not good).
Anyway thought I would let you know becasue it is a big decision. So if you purchased a runout model of this model or the 2006, Im sure you would be very happy. The 2005 model is less noisy that earlier DiDs and we have driven the earler ones and they are noisey. Our car is actually not noisy especially once it is up and going. Have a close look and good luck with your choice. We love our car and would really recomend it for quality and performance.
Lenni
AnswerID:
192362
Follow Up By: dennisV - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 20:53
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 20:53
Hi Lenni,
Thank you for your comments - I'm glad you're enjoying your car :) The Pajeros might actually drop down in price with the new model coming out soon, so I'll be watching them if I don't decide before that.
FollowupID:
450224
Reply By: Off-track - Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 22:34
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 22:34
Why isnt the Prado diesel on your list? Price I assume. You would really need to factor in some operating costs of the Prado petrol v the other diesels if that is they way you are limited.
AnswerID:
192399
Follow Up By: dennisV - Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:53
Sunday, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:53
It's actually a combination of price-features, because at that quite a high price the diesel is offered in 4sp automatic, while the petrol is a 5sp auto. I believe that if getting an auto and looking at quite expensive cars, I should at least get a 5sp auto tiptronic, as anything below that is becoming outdated at the moment.
FollowupID:
450265
Reply By: dennisV - Monday, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:03
Monday, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:03
Funnily enough, I have to take Pathfinder off my list. The seats in the back once again proved to be kids-only (and I'm talking about 2nd row here, not 3rd!) and I can't imagine an adult there sitting for a few hundred ks.
Another thought that I had is to get a cheaper car, such as an X-Trail or and Outlander or similar and then I'd be able to buy a boat a bit later on. This sounds better to me :)
What do you guys think about X-Trails, Outlanders, XC70 and other more compact SUVs, that still have decent boot space for 2 dogs (Jeep Grand Cherokee also has enough space, but in the previous model, not the current one)?
I heard from a Nissan dealer that a new X-Trail is coming out soon, but I cannot seem to find any preview pics or anything - does anyone have any information on that?
Thanks!
AnswerID:
192597