Thursday, Sep 14, 2006 at 18:09
HIho,
Um, thats not very nice :-)
"What a f*%#head idea Richo."
You want to pay it on your tracks you do in the High Country too? - yes, if im using fuel to drive on them I dont see why not.
Maybe I didnt articulate the idea
well enough, I thought I'd leave that for some intelligent discussion here :-(
Rebates can still apply, perhaps addressed at point of purchase. If you buy fuel in
camooweal, it doesnt get taxed as high. Im sure you'd love to take a long drive in the country then?
Also, I think some people have missed the point. The levy would be charged on usage of fuel. If you chainsaw uses fuel, it is taxed. We're talking a few cents here for you to be able to cut down a whole tree.
Other comments (not you) also talked about multiple drivers of one vehicle. It is the vehicle usage which is taxed, has nothing to do with the actual driver.
Lets call it a carbon tax then.
And obviously, as discussed here, rebates can be applied in certain areas i.e. off road use, in fact little would change there.
I dont see whats wrong with paying 'more' tax on your fuel if you use a gas guzzling vehicle or drive a lot.
As for country users, it would be very easy to manipulate a levy and rebates to provide relief to those consumers.
OK maybe its not 'perfect' -I went out on a limb there, though I do like the idea of direct taxes for consumption, ala GST.
I see a lot of negatives here and noone likes change, but I thought it worthy of discussion.
cheers
richo
FollowupID:
452560