Fuel consumption
Submitted: Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 21:40
ThreadID:
37747
Views:
3385
Replies:
3
FollowUps:
4
This Thread has been Archived
wyrss
Gday,
have recently become the owner of a FJ62 Landcruiser.
It's runs a dual fuel (gas/petrol) 3F motor, but seems to be very heavy on fuel.
Around 3km per litre and down to 2km per litre when towing our boat.
It's not all that powerful, someone said fitting extractors may help??
Is this about the mark for an old 1984 model Toyota or should I be looking to make some alterations.
thanks again
WYRSS
Reply By: Davo_60 - Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 22:33
Friday, Sep 15, 2006 at 22:33
I had an FJ62 Sahara on gas/petrol (auto), 350k on it when I sold it. Was getting around 22L per 100k on gas, or 4 to 5 km per litre. It had extractors and 2 1/2 inch exhaust, still not overly powerful but will plug away all day. Was quite reliable.
AnswerID:
194769
Follow Up By: wyrss - Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:30
Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:30
thanksdavo,
sound like I'd better get someone to do some fine tuning for me.
Steve
FollowupID:
452860
Reply By: Big Woody - Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:49
Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:49
WYRSS,
I had an FJ62 Sahara on dual fuel for many years and it was one of the best 4by's I've ever had.
I towed a 1500kg trailer every day of my life for work when I had it as I was a builder then. I also had other interests which generally meant I was regularly towing heavy loads such as 2500kg boats, tandem car trailers etc...
I just checked some of my old consumption figures and the worst I ever got either when labouring in heavy sand or towing in the mountains was 25L/100km or in your figures is 3.5km/L. This was when running on gas and was a bit better than this on petrol.
When I first purchased the truck and before I bolted on bullbar,
driving lights, roofrack and another 500kg of accessories (140L Gas
tank, 125L Fuel
Tank, 6/15x11 steel rims with 33x12 tyres etc.) I actually returned some very good figures of 8.5km/L (11.7L/100km). But each time i added more weight or did something that affected aerodynamics the figures dropped to the point where the best I could get when it was empty and on the highway was 6km/L (16.6L/100km).
I agree with you that your consumption figures seem excessive and dual fuel vehicles with a carby are always going to have to be tuned as a compromise on one fuel or the other but I think if you take it to an LPG specialist for a good tune up you should be able to get some better consumption figures than you are currently getting.
Best regards,
Brett
AnswerID:
194783
Follow Up By: wyrss - Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:33
Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:33
ta brett,
I had a mate over Friday night for a beer and his job is to spec up tanks etc for the army. He was telling me that our newest 67tonne tanks return better fuel economy than my old girl, so yeh , time for a tune.
steve
FollowupID:
452861
Reply By: ross - Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:11
Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:11
I had a 3F in my 73 series until I converted it to a 1HZ . My fuel comsumption varied from 15-20 litres per 100 klms.
It does not have fast acceleration and extractors are more of a placebo effect in my book.
The engine is based on a 50 year old chev 6 cyl when fuel was 15 cents a gallon in the US.
I would get it looked at by someone who knows about LPG conversions.
The spark from the distributor is naturally weak and some say an aftermarket kit will improve peformance.
My 1HZ conversion cost $9000+ for a rebuilt engine ,gearbox doing much of it myself.
It get about 13 ltres per 100 and will take a long long time to get my money back but I am very happy wih it
AnswerID:
194810
Follow Up By: wyrss - Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:26
Saturday, Sep 16, 2006 at 14:26
I never realised how much fun these old cruisers are.
There seems to be an endless array of possible conversions and tinkering to keeps us off the streets.
thanks
steve
FollowupID:
452859
Follow Up By: ross - Sunday, Sep 17, 2006 at 22:47
Sunday, Sep 17, 2006 at 22:47
Yes they are great for us home mechanics. Lots of room for the fingers,only basic
tools needed,lots of spares around and the electricals are elementary.
If its got a good body maybe a diesel swap is for you.
Not cheap but very satisfying.
FollowupID:
453074