Access to Aboriginal Land

Submitted: Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 17:53
ThreadID: 38368 Views:3574 Replies:11 FollowUps:15
This Thread has been Archived
A post last week (post ID 38265) got a few of us expressing thoughts & opinions regarding the current permit based access to Aboriginal Lands.

Further investigation reveals that there is a discussion paper on this. I have looked at it, and the paper expands the issues significantly. Visit

www.oipc.gov.au

and click on the link named 'Permit System' under the What's New box on the home page. This will take you to the discussion paper.

I have not seen the aboriginal lands - the current system restricts access for me - have you?

I will be making a submission - will you?

Cheers
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Jimbo - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:09

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:09
No, I won't bother making a submission.

Having read the Discussion Paper, it is clear the decisions have already been made.

Inviting submissions is a formality to appease the public.
AnswerID: 198417

Follow Up By: Rick (S.A.) - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:24

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:24
Jimbo

are you a cynic, or a realist? If the latter, what happened to create that view on this topic?

At least you care enough to read the paper!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 457113

Follow Up By: Jimbo - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:47

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:47
Rick,

I'm cynical enough to know that governments don't listen, particularly this one; and realistic enough to know the decision has been made.

"Discussion Paper" my arse. Discussion papers should pose questions. All that thing did was detail the justification for the decision that has aleady been made.

I'm not saying it was totally right or wrong; some of it made good sense, some of it bordered on "Big Brother" (George Orwell, 1984, not that crass, infantile TV show). Anyway, it's a done deal.

ATB,

Jim.
0
FollowupID: 457116

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:55

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:55
I agree with Jimbo...
0
FollowupID: 457167

Reply By: David from David and Justine Olsen's 4WD Tag-Along - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:20

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:20
Yes I will
AnswerID: 198419

Reply By: Mike Harding - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:49

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:49
Yep, I will too.

Number 4 option sounds sensible to me.

---------------
Without wishing to alter the direction of the thread I could not help but smile a wry smile at the following quote from the document:

"Arguably the permit system serves only to restrict those inclined to respect the
law – not those who already flaunt the law and operate in spite of the permit
system."

If only the government adopted the same perspective in relation to those of us who own firearms.
---------------

But; YES - this system need changing – it’s not good for anyone.

Mike Harding
AnswerID: 198421

Follow Up By: Willem - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:07

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:07
Ahh....... the Gun debate

I had to do a TAFE course and a practical shoot to get my SA licence after moving here from the NT.

I heard on the radio a few days ago they now want to overhaul the Firearms Licence conditions as it is 10 years since Port Arthur and the sunset clause is about to become a reality.

The baddies will always have access to fireams and we goodies will always be penalised for doing the right thing!
0
FollowupID: 457183

Reply By: Old4runner - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:54

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 18:54
With the way this country is pandering to these people and the High Courts ruling on the latest Native Title act this is nothing more than Apartheid in reverse. Although Heritage listing takes precedent over Native Title, the Canning Stock Route remains one of the last free journeys across this country. Every where else its another revenue raising exercise. And you thought South Africa was bad back in the pre 1994 elections prior to when Mandela came to power. If you people in Australia sit on your laurels and do nothing, soon there wont be many places left on the map of Australia for us to visit. Our freedom to travel this country and our rights are gradually being eroded by a few do-gooders, members of the Green party and an apathetic public.
AnswerID: 198422

Follow Up By: Jimbo - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:10

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:10
"pandering to these people"

I thought we, as a country, tried to help out the less fortunate.

We are talking about a race of people who have had their natural life style taken from them and complex problems have arisen.

Don't forget that these people were shot for sport and had their children taken from them for their "own good". Don't forget the race in Tasmania was wiped out. Don't forget that alcohol was not their doing.

I'm not saying there aren't some self induced problems amongst some, but please accept that they need help, mainly for problems that they didn't have 250 years ago.

We as a community have a responsibility to ALL Australians.
0
FollowupID: 457126

Follow Up By: Footloose - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:50

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:50
Jimbo, I've spent a bit of time visiting and studying various communities and stations from an academic and practical on the ground situation.
I don't claim to have all the answers, in fact I don't even have all the questions !
But I do know that it's time for the aboriginal people to start looking forward instead of backwards.
I can tell you that our Govt policies have, in the past, resulted in a hip pocket cargo cult mentality among various groups. Cut the funding and the result would be almost genocide unless alternative strategies were employed.
Many of these policies may have been appropriate at the time, but not now. For the aboriginal people to move on requires a partnership between the taxpayers dollar and reciprocal actions by the communities and peoples that receive those dollars.
The aboriginal population is now growing at a huge rate, their numbers are now back to where they were before we whites got here.
This of course means additional resources must be financed.
One of the problems with the permit system, I believe, is that it gets in the way of accountability. Not just financial but social. Many groups have played the aboriginal card for far too long and far too successfully, much to the detriment of the average community member.
Unfortunately there is no "one size fits all" solution.
I believe that our paternalistic policies have had a lot to do with this mess.
"Sit down money" has been a curse for many.
However there are signs of change from both the Govt and some aboriginal leaders eg on Cape York.
One of the changes is with the permit system. I believe that selective removal of this system is the way to go, for many reasons.

We can't have two nations with one funding the other.
White and black, we must all think of ourselves as Australian, with similar rights and responsibilities.

It will take time as well as changes in policies and attitudes, but the results will be worth it.


0
FollowupID: 457139

Follow Up By: Jimbo - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 20:50

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 20:50
It's a very complex problem Footy and I agree with most of what you have to say.

But it's not a problem that will ever be addressed by comments (not your's) like "Apartheid in reverse". That is just divisive.

After all, we are talking about human beings.

"but the results will be worth it." (your comment). I just hope the results are achieved soon. We just can't live in a country where infant mortality, alcohol abuse, inordinate life expectancy, et al has become an accepted way of life for a portion of OUR population.
0
FollowupID: 457154

Follow Up By: Footloose - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:14

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:14
Jimbo, agree with your main points.
I can also understand the frustration of those who see the billions of dollars spent in this area, dollars which appear to benefit one section of our society who then appear to "lock away" what some see as public lands.
No wonder there has been some hostility towards what some have seen as giving a section of our society more than a fair go. Sadly some of this hostility is justified, although much stems from ignorance, rumour and mis information.
Maybe we need to look at the problems one by one.
e.g.
Law and order
Health and longevity
Substance abuse
Land rights issues
etc.....
The strategies have to come from a partnership between the Govt... and the locals.
Whilst these issues are all intertwined, little has been gained by simply throwing money and locking the problems away from public view with the permit system.
It has needed examining for some time.
Having said that, I have two words of advice for those tasked with such responsibilities.

"Good luck!"

0
FollowupID: 457162

Reply By: equinox - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:36

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 19:36
I'd like to have a say Rick, but I can't help feeling rather ignorant on the issue. There seems to be many layers of legislation - this being only one of them.

I had a quick read of the paper. I think it says that only the habited areas will become more accessible. My personal desires are for access to the uninhabited areas, as you know, and I can't see where that is covered in the paper. (As much as I'd like to have a beer in downtown Warburton.)

Despite what Jimbo says I think it would appear to be a good opportunity to express our opinions - perhaps it is the "thin edge of the sword" chance.

As I say - I would like to submit something, but I can just see the government lawyers come back to me and say "Well, thanks Equinox for your opinion, but we cannot allow that because of this section of such and such act etc.

Would it be better, and perhaps carry more weight if all who had an interest, were a joint signatory to a submission that has been checked by a legal mind amongst us?

Looking for adventure.
In whatever comes our way.



Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 198427

Follow Up By: png62 - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 20:29

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 20:29
Well Ladies and Gentlemen,
"If only" the law makers in this country could read everything said above and come up with a usable system for "all Australians" without impinging on the "rights" of any other "Aussies"............I know I really sound "out of touch" but could this be one of those chances where we can actually have our voices heard................I'd really like to be able to join a partition which was so well put together (beyond my capacity) that it would get the attention we need. Yep, I'm one of the Law abiding mugs.

I have printed the paper and will study it in the belief that I will make a personal submission - I don't believe the decision can have been made already.

I know it would appear that to achieve change, we have to "push the proverbial uphill with our noses"................Whats worse wasting our time trying or giving up without a go.

Here's hopes for meeting anyone I like, anywhere in Australia, anytime.
0
FollowupID: 457147

Follow Up By: David from David and Justine Olsen's 4WD Tag-Along - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:43

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:43
For a bloke who argues a petition is beyond him, that was well put!

Staying out of the aboriginal debate, I see the land access issue as the biggest issue facing us, and as more and more of our favorite tracks and gravel roads are paved because polititians believe they should, and since presidents of four wheel drive associations agree with them, it is up to you and I to push EVERY avenue to improve access.

The only way this can be done is to work WITH stakeholders, including traditional land owners. The average person in the community wouldn't care about the permit system I don't think, but those in the aboriginal industry do. We need to be part of the solution that gives he average aboriginal person in these communities the kind of life expectancy the rest of us have, while allowing them to stay in touch with their culture. We need to force our politicians to listen to us, by showing that we are prepared to 1. provide solutions, 2. work with stakeholders 3. Kick them out of office if they don't work with us.

Cheers
David
0
FollowupID: 457166

Reply By: Upstart - Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 22:10

Monday, Oct 09, 2006 at 22:10
I'm a firm believer in choice. I make a decision and based on that decision there will be consequences. Blaming others for your situation will not help. I realise that some people will believe they may be in a hopeless situation but having negative thoughts and basing decisions on actions based on those negative thoughts will not see you through in this world. And let's face it. Our Australia has changed a hell of a lot in the last 236 years. This is our country. Make a smart choice, make it better.

p.s. I was born here here, therefore I'm indigenous. I object to being shut out of certain areas for the benefit of a few.
AnswerID: 198465

Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 00:15

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 00:15
Upstart

You may have to look up the trem indigenous

Being born here makes you an Australian not indigenous

un less I'm wrong,,,,

site Site Link

Richard
0
FollowupID: 457179

Reply By: Old4runner - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 00:34

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 00:34
Jimbo. I think you missed the point and mis interpreted my posting about "pandering to these people" and "'Apartheid in Reverse " At a recent meeting of Trackcare in Perth, a couple of months ago, we were addresses by two young females - barely out of nappies, who blustered and bumbled their way trying to explain about the Native Title Act. They were not Aboriginal people but two young white females. These two claimed to be representing some unpronounceable name of some Aboriginal tribe who laid claim to most of WA. They ( the tribe ) have now stated that they do not want tourists moving more than 4.5 Km from the left and right of the Canning Stock Route. This tribe claim to have "sacred land " where there is "secret men's business " and " secret woman's business" This country is already become divisive over Muslims, Aboriginals and many other nationalities that have been allowed into Australia. We are most definitely seeing signs of racial hatred among blacks and whites. Oil and Water do not mix and no amount of trying to make different cultures come together will ever succeed ! - certainly not in what remaining years I have left, and probably never in my Grand children's time.
The fact that alcohol and drugs is a problem with the Aboriginals is also the same problem with white people in this country. The blame for the alcohol problem rest fair and square with Gough Whitlam . It was he who instituted the dole and the giving of to the Aboriginals. And if you try to deny it , go back and read through your history of the stuff up Whitlam made of this country. Granted there are a number of highly educated Aboriginals in business and commerce and make brilliant tour guides, but to put a ban on us who support these people through our highly taxed system of taxes etc is nothing short of double standards. I thought we lived in a fair an equal society !Or so we are lead to believe by the politicians from both sides of the fence. Like hell we do , one rule for them, one rule for us and the rule is in favour of them. Why should I have to fork out $100 to cross the Simpson desert ? Where is the money going. ? Who is benefiting from the money I pay to have access to the Simpson. Talk about double standards. What about my rights as a taxpaying citizen of this so called fair country. Pigs might fly before there is equality between the inhuman human race.
No one is going to dictate to me or any other person as to where I can go and not go. And what about overseas tourists who bring their own four wheel drives and tour across this country. Do they know about Native Titles etc and where they can go and cant go.?? We are bound up in so much red tape that eventually we will strangle ourselves to death with it.
AnswerID: 198481

Follow Up By: NicI - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:11

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:11
"No one is going to dictate to me or any other person as to where I can go and not go" - Try going into Pine Gap, where you'll quickly realise it's property of the USA (thanks, Malcolm Fraser) and back off, or be shot by heavily armed US servicemen. Not our country, nor our planet - it's all owned and run by others.
0
FollowupID: 457228

Follow Up By: Jimbo - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 19:19

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 19:19
Old4runner,

That is a sad, bigottted, rabid right wing rant.
0
FollowupID: 457321

Reply By: PhilZD30Patrol - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:17

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:17
Hi

Thanks for drawing our attention to this web posting. I will certainly read it and respond if I think I have something worthwhile to contribute.

Regarding claims of "Apartheid in Reverse" I really think this is an over reaction.

Before claiming to be victims of Apartheid we should be clear what we are talking about.

Apartheid is not being able to;
- live in the suburb where you live now
- send your kids to your local school
- go to the local shops
- walk on the road
- play football or cricket
- go to the beach
- go to university
- go to church
- go to the local hospital
- be treated by your local doctor
- catch the train or bus
- ride in the lift
- walk up the stairs
- park in the car park
- own property in your town or suburb
- vote
- say what you want to say
- sue some one
- complain to the police
- get your local solicitor to assist you in legal matters
- complain about not getting paid the minimum wage
- do all the normal things you do as a matter of right

SIMPLY BECAUSE OF YOUR SKIN COLOUR and for no other reason.

Apartheid is exactely what I have ddescribed above. It was the legal policy in some states of the USA and in South Africa in my life time and I am not yet 60 years old!

It was introduced and supported by a significant number of decent God fearing, Christian, white skinned people of English and Northern European decent.

Regards
Phil
AnswerID: 198545

Reply By: Old4runner - Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:58

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 13:58
Apartheid ( Afrikaans word meaning SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT.) The great architect of the Apartheid was CECIL RHODES, founder of both what was once Northern and Southern Rhodesia. Now in the hands of BLACK lunatic dictators - Look what Mugabe has done to Rhodesia !!! Apartheid is actually pronounced Apart hate not Apart-hite. Its still alive and well in some parts of the USA and in Australia !!! but no one has the guts to say its still alive and well and thriving. Even if its reversed in Australia. Only have to go up North like the family and I did several years ago and went to a pub for a coldie and lunch. On the door of the pub it said BLACKS this side WHITES next door. People like to bury their heads in the sand an not face up to reality. I guess I `ve been around too long and watched the world get worse as the years go by - certainly not better, and as the clock ticks along and my time is starting to run out, I wonder what the future generation of todays new born babies will have to inherit - a total mess. Nuff said. Find something more cheerful to talk about !!!
AnswerID: 198563

Reply By: Old4runner - Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:37

Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:37
I grew up in South Africa during the Apartheid ere. Now the country is worse off since the blacks took over. The value of the Rand has dropped and is worth nothing now. Good place to go a for a very cheap holiday as the exchage rate is very much in our favour. Will be over there for Christmas for 8 weeks, and will spend some time in Cape Town visiting some of the best wineries in the country.
And Jimbo you are a bloody idiot as you know nothing about whats gong on in your own country. You have got your head burried in the sand and dont want ot face the truth and the reality of whats happening in this country.
I am neither sad, bigoted and a right wing whatever. Just a normal human being who sees it as it is and tells it as it is . if you dont like the truth , why wast your time ranting andf raving like a spoiled brat. You havent read up on your history . Thats a fact, as you know nothing about Cecil Rhodes and Hendrik Verwoerd. You probably have never heard of them either. You are clutching at straws hoping I`ll swallow tha bait. Sorryyou are such a an uneducated person with little knowledge of worldy affair. In my travels around this country , I have met and spoek with many people who agree with my comments, so does thaty mean the majority of people in this country or sad, bigoted right wing . What a load of unmitigated hogwash. Get your history books out and go learn a thing or two about worldy events. Moron.
AnswerID: 198675

Reply By: The Landy - Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:21

Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:21
I've found that it is mutual respect that usually brings people closer together; that is one of the main things (on both sides) that is missing.....fix that and we'll be well on our way to countering some of these other issues.

AnswerID: 198680

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:20

Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:20
Well put Landy.
0
FollowupID: 457405

Follow Up By: Joombi - Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:05

Wednesday, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:05
Well said landy, its just a shame that respect is dying with discipline....
0
FollowupID: 457428

Sponsored Links