load distribution hitch Recommendation

Submitted: Saturday, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:09
ThreadID: 38688 Views:10838 Replies:8 FollowUps:10
This Thread has been Archived
Hi all,

I would like some advice if anyone is familiar with the 2 main brands of load distribution hitches.

1) Haymanreese
2) Camec 4 bar

I have a Subaru outback 2.5 and am picking up a Windsor Rapid 471 , ball weight 105kg and TAR 1200kg

The car is rated to tow 1500kg and 90kg ball weight without a hitch and 150kg with a hitch.

Anyone have any feedback on etiher of the 2 above load equliser models ?

From what I can wee , other than the Haymanreese is 3 times the cost of the Camec:

The camec is none adjustable and with the 4 bar model takes off about 90kg (their sepcs say for weights up to 125kg use the 4 bar but it actually moves about 90kg of the load)

The Haymanreese will move up to 225kg of the ball weight BUT the advantage I see is that its adjustable so you can even up the car depending on your load. I guess the 4 bar is too if you leave off 2 of the bars but thats a pretty rough adjustment compared to the Haymanreese.

I am though still looking at going with the Camec as the Caravan Supplier recommends the Camec as he says due to the light ball weight of the Windsor the Haymanreese is way overkill for my needs.

Anyone have any advise or suggestions ?

many thanks
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Saturday, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:28

Saturday, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:28
My two cents worth - go for the H-R now (or it's Trailboss equivalent). Yes, it costs more but you get a lot more.

First, your Rapid might have a ball weight of 105kg empty but when loaded towards ATM (1500kg?) the ball weight SHOULD be around 10%: 130-150 kg. The four-bar will NOT be able to re-distribute that much ball weight and restore the weight on the Suburu's FRONT wheels (the whole point of weight distribution is to restore the original weight onto the steering axle).

Also, you get the fully adjustable ball mount which can be adjusted for ball height to match most trailers/vans as well as to adjust the cams for optimum spring bar tension.

And if you decide to get a bigger van/tow vehicle later on, the H-R will last for years and suit anything up to about a 2500 ATM van.

No connection to H-R - just a very satisfied customer of many years standing.
AnswerID: 200196

Reply By: Member - len W (NSW) - Saturday, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:24

Saturday, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:24
another two cents worth

1974 i was taken to the reese hitch in victoria factory to do a 2 day corse on there hitches fitting and how they were made
also they had a 21 ft van set up towed by a ford fairlane they took us to a disused airodrome put out some whiches hats and we about 10 of us from all over the country were given a drive to see what we could do {either shake the van from the car tip it over get up the death wobbles you name it we tried even running one wheel off the side of the road and snapping it back on the bitumum } and i can tell you not one of us could could make the car/van unsafe everywere the car went the van followed
i still have a R/h from 1978 its been on 3 f w d we have had and towed 6 caravans all told from poptops to full vans i wont use anything else (oh and i dont work or sell them)
the other 4 bars used to be called level rides they pick the car up and would stop a little of the swaying but no where near as good as a R/H
R/H cost a lot more but you will have them for longer

hope this helps .............len
AnswerID: 200199

Follow Up By: SKI'er - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 18:32

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 18:32
Thank you Ian from Thermoguard and (member) Len W.

We are just completing the pregnancy of getting our very first caravan. Whilst it is exciting it is rather like buying our first video cassette recorder so many things to learn, and many questions to ask , some of which we wish we had asked 5 months ago.

A major question that has had to be sorted very early in the peace was which type of hitch to buy to accommodate a 1994 Pathfinder TI (we love our Pathy) with a 120kg ball weight and a Coromal with about 150kg (unladen) of weight. I know ....dumb...."One of the questions we didn't nail yestermonth."

We will take all of your comments on board and we will go for the but we have another question. There are 2 models

model #1 79504 which is rated at 550lbs and costs $649 and
model #2 76504 which is rated at 750lbs and costs $660.

The cost difference is minimal. Does it follow that it is better to have a bigger one just in case for further down the track situations such as "if our vehicle and caravan change?"

Regards
SKI'er
0
FollowupID: 459618

Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 08:25

Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 08:25
Hi SKIer,

Sorry, didn't notice your quesion until now. The 550lb/250kg model is plenty of capacity for vans up to 2500kg ATM/250kg ball load. So, unless you think you might want a really BIG van (>2500kg ATM) some time in the future, the 250kg model sill be fine. But if you think it's a possibility the 350kg might be "the go".

Bear in mind that if your using a 350kg hitch with a small van/CT and only, say, 100 kg ball load, if might be a bit tricky adjusting it. That is, each increment of chain link and/or cam position adjustment with the bigger hitch repersents a bigger increment of ball load adjustment.
Ian
0
FollowupID: 462551

Follow Up By: SKI'er - Monday, Nov 06, 2006 at 17:47

Monday, Nov 06, 2006 at 17:47
Thanks Ian,

Another member suggested alot of my problems with low ball weight capacity on our vehicle could be rectified with Polyaire bags and I visited my local Opposite Lock to see them and learn more about them.

When asked about which HR hitch Opposite Lock said that the lower lb. rated one would be best.

We pick up the caravan this Wednesday. All very exciting and then very soon after that it the HR hitch, polyaire bags and oil transmission coolers.

Then its off for a few short, week long trips closeish to home before the Christmas school holidays begin and all the van parks get really full.. We will use the lay up waiting and planning for February when we intend to do a 3 monther from Ballina to Ceduna and home.

Thanks for your input
SKI'er
0
FollowupID: 462954

Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:31

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:31
Hi SKIer,

I'm afraid the advice about polyairs may be a bit misguided. While they are an excellent product and fantastic for helping to carry heavy loads IN the vehicle, they are completely unrelated to issues of ball weight and weight distribution.

The ball weight limit is determined by the manufacturer of the vehicle, presumably taking into account the strength of the chassis and the hitch receiver mountings, etc. Now, it's fairly common for there to be a ball load limit of 120kg applied when using just the standard tongue, but a higher load is often allowed if using a WD hitch (with the incredibly strong solid-tongued ball mount). If your hitch receiver (towbar) is a Hayman-Reese, phone and ask them what the ball load limit is if using a WD hitch. If it's a genuine Nissan hitch receiver, good luck trying to get any sensible answers out of anyone. (And if the Nissan hitch receiver design on your model Pathfinder is anything like the new model Pathy, I wouldn't tow a box trailer with it!)

As I understand it, the correct way to use air bags (PolyAir etc.) and WD hitches is like this:

The airbags are to help carry the load IN the vehicle. Measure the distance from the rear wheel arch to the ground with the vehicle empty. Load up with your full travelling load in the back of the vehicle (Car fridge, camping gear, tools, spares, etc., etc.) and adjust the airbag pressure until the rear wheel arches are back UP to the original height.

Next, on flat ground, adjust the caravan jockey wheel until the van is level or just a tad nose UP. Back up to the caravan and adjust the ball mount so that the ball is in line with the coupling. Now (still uncoupled from the van), measure the height of the vehicle's FRONT wheel arches. Couple up the caravan in a straight line on flat ground and now adjust the WD hitch tension (using the adjustment cams) until, with 3 loose links on the chains, the height of the FRONT wheels arches is brought back DOWN to the uncoupled height.

You now have your caravan coupled and the ball weight distributed so that the weight (and hence steering and braking ability) on the vehicle's front axle is the same as it was uncoupled.
0
FollowupID: 463068

Reply By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:24

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:24
So Russell, what did you decide?
Ian
AnswerID: 200428

Reply By: russellb - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:31

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:31
After reading through the forums and reading peoples helpfull feedback I can see that the 4 bar type would be maxed out at the high end of it's ability and although it would work it would not do the best job , a Haymanreese would allow me to distribute the max weight possible and do the best job.

I am surpirsed the caravan suppler said I would not need to go to a Haymenreese as if you look at the tar on the van 1200 10% ball weight @ 120kg immeditely puts me at the max end of the 4 bar. Although the van's plate says ball weight 105kg which seems a bit on the low end given everyone keeps talking about ball weight having to be (or suggested to be) 10%

now just have to tell SWMBO that I need to spend the extra $$

cheers

Russell
AnswerID: 200431

Follow Up By: gottabjoaken - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 21:23

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 21:23
"I am surpirsed the caravan suppler said ..."
and
"now just have to tell SWMBO that I need to spend the extra $$"

You answered your own question...
Caravan seller too interested in selling caravan...

cynic - me!

Ken
0
FollowupID: 459670

Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 08:45

Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 08:45
Hi Russell,
Tell SWMBO it's pretty cheap insurance to safeguard your $20K+ van. Does the dealer by any chance sells Camecs but not H-Rs?
Re. ball weight 105kg :- That may well be the tare ball weight - when the van was dead empty at the factory gates. What matters is what it is when your fully loaded and ready to hit the highway - and I recommend you weigh it to find out.

Many city rubbish tips/transfer stations these dyas have in/out lane weighbridges. If the pick a quiet time, the operator will often let you use one for a few minutes to check your van. Drive across the bridge until the tow vehicle rear wheels are just off the bridge. Note the weight now(A). Next, release any weight distribution bars fitted and note the weight - this is your static axle load(B). Now, fit the jockey wheel and raise the coupling just off the ball (with the jockey wheel just ON the bridge, of course - and you NOT standing on the bridge during any reading too!). With the van now separated from the vehicle, this is your ATM (aggregate trialer mass).

Now, ball load = ATM(C) - static axle load(B), and is hopefully ~10% of ATM.

The first weight(A), with the WD bars installed, should be a bit higher than the static axle load(B) - this difference is the proportion of ball load being distributed to the van axle - the rest is being put back on the front axle of the tow vehicle.

Hope this is not all gooble-gook. If so, PM me and I'll have another go.
0
FollowupID: 462556

Reply By: Redback - Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:11

Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:11
One thing you guys are forgetting is that 1200kg van will, dare i say it, be well in access of 1600kg once you load all your gear into it, not to mention the gear in the car and the people travelling in the car.

No offence but that's a lot of weight for a Subaroo.

Baz.
AnswerID: 203024

Reply By: russellb - Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 15:53

Saturday, Nov 04, 2006 at 15:53
Thanks for all the feedback.

The Subaru 2.5 is rated to tow a max 1500kg and Ball Weight with WD hitch 150kg

The Van's max loading is also 1500kg. Makes me wonder what the carvan companies think we are going to do when they build a van with only an allowance for 300kg , 240kg if you fill the water, 230 with gas, knock another 30 off for fudge factor so say 200kg of stuff you can carry in the van.

Does not leave too much , I can imagine there are a lot of overloaded vans out there if this is typical.

Anyway I figure that if I can keep the van's load down to 200 - 250 kg i'll be on the right track. As we are always in a caravan park I don't plan to travel with water tanks full.

On another note just fitted a nice 17" LCD :-) bugger down to 190kg !

Can anyone recommend an econmical TV antenna . the Winegard RV-3095 Sensar III caught my eye .. easy setup as it folds down on the roof and you can operate it from inside.. anyone used this one ?
AnswerID: 203049

Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:57

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:57
Hi Russell,

Our current van came with a Winegard Sensar III and we're very happy with it. Simple and convenient to use and works at least as well as our previous external antenna/booster on a telescopic pole. It's been up in some very strong winds with no ill effects. When factory installed they presumably make sure the roof is adequately strong for the antenna mount. Fitting aftermarket might be trickier if any extra roof bracing is needed.

300kg payload for single axles and 400kg for tandems seems to the de facto 'industry standard'. And yes, that has to include gas, water and any accessories added post-factory, like roll-out awnings, TV antennae, etc. before you even load a pair of clean socks!

You can get a higher payload but it costs money. Most custom-builders will build you a van with a higher payload and if you're really keen, you can have a van modified and re-certified.

We did this with our current van - it was a standard 18' tandem pop-top which we got near-new at the right price. We then paid Caboolture Caravan Repairs to strengthen the chassis for better rough-road ability. The original (remarkably accurate) Tare was 1550kg and the ATM 1950kg. CCR added 90kg of steel and extra spring leaves and I added 60kg of batteries from our previous van and it was re-Tared at 1700kg But, more importantly, because of the chassis strengthening, they were happy to certify it for an ATM of 2300kg (the original axle group rating is 2900kg, so plenty of margin there) - giving us 600kg of payload. This is all stamped on an official Qld Transport modification plate.

No connection to CCR - again, just very satisfied customers.
Ian
0
FollowupID: 463074

Reply By: russellb - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:18

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:18
So how much was the conversion CCR did ?
AnswerID: 203517

Follow Up By: Redback - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:56

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:56
Russell, if your max tow limit is 1500kg and the van is 1500kg when loaded, which it will be, if not over, then you won't be able to carry, legally, anything in the cargo section of your car, and not only that this includes the amount of passengers as well.

Mate these sort of weights are usually only towed by vehicles with a 1800kg to 2500kg tow capacity, not 1500kg as with your Subaroo.

I would be having second thoughts about towing this van with the Subbie.

Just my thoughts

Baz.
0
FollowupID: 463087

Reply By: russellb - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:08

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:08
mmm as far as I am aware the cars capacity etc is quoted in the manual as:

Max Tow weight: 1,500kg

then there is MAX car load weight, rear axle load etc

Tow weight = Tow weight not max load in car.

the ball weight of 105kg is the only actuall weight load when towing that adds to the rear axle weight

please someone xorrect me if I am wrong here.
AnswerID: 203527

Follow Up By: Redback - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:32

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:32
Put it this way the ball weight is included in the rear cargo weight of your car, so if your towing at max tow capacity and your ball weight of the van is 150kg then you have to have less weight in your car that equals 2 people of the equivalent weight in luggage.

Baz.
0
FollowupID: 463093

Follow Up By: Redback - Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:41

Tuesday, Nov 07, 2006 at 13:41
that should read "to 2 people or equivalent weight in luggage"
0
FollowupID: 463096

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)