Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:59
I’ve enjoyed reading this post and particularly the reply’s to my original post it is good that we debate these sorts of issues and have a better understanding of issues that effect our everyday lives.
It is my belief that world oil prices are controlled by a political agenda by our politicians and for people to believe that this is not the case is ludicrous.
There are several significant events happening in the world today. We are at war with Iraq and we have two countries having elections within the next twelve months we have the US elections next month where half the congress will be re-elected and all the polling is showing that Bush with loose control of the congress. We also will have elections within twelve months here in Australia.
If you look at the three countries that are the major supports of the Iraq invasion and war it is US, Brittan and Australia. As we know Brittan and Australia will do whatever the US tell them to do, and that is how I draw the link to Howard.
Beazley may not be your first choice as a political leader however he is not a George Bush puppet nor do I believe he is an ideological evil liar, like
John Howard. I will refer to my previous statement
“People Don’t Be Coned fuel prices are being used as a political tool just like:
Interest rates
Children Overboard
Weapons of mass destruction
War on terror
The wheat board
Attack on workers rights”
Lets look at these one by one,
Interest Rates, I was a person that had two mortgages when interest rates where 17% this was certainly hard at the time but I would be much better paying 17% on a mortgage of $50k then what the Howard government has created being a con that interest rates are low at 8% I would rather pay 17% on $50k then 8% on $300k this is what our kids will have to pay. So the interest rate debate that was run by Howard was a con and preyed on the venerable.
Children Overboard, this was one of the greatest cons and lies that this country has ever seen where a political party blatantly lied and used this issue to be re-elected as the investigation showed. Howard had been advised that there had been no such incident, but did not reveal this until after the election because it did not suit the political climate at the time.
Weapons of mass destruction, this is the reason we so called needed to invade Iraq to liberate them with our so called democracy despite all the hype and panic created around the world these weapons did not exist. We have since found out that our political leaders including
John Howard where advised as this prior so the invasion this is once again a con, the war in Iraq has nothing to do with terror has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, it is all about the US Oil supply of which
John Howard has been a political puppet of George Bush.
War on Terror, although I do not support terrism or wars in any way shape or form when you have the US manipulating and supply weapons to middle eastern countries in the world is anyone surprised that some of these countries or organizations may want to fight back? What happened with 9/11 and was linked to Alkida has nothing to do with Iraq they are two separate identities but despite this
John Howard has once again prostituted our countries values to satisfy George Bush’s agenda.
The wheat board, it is clear that this government was involved in the wheat board scandal and must take responsibility for this.
Attack on workers rights, the worst choices legislations are the most openly unbalanced legislation this country has ever seen and takes away from current workers and our kids the very foundations that we have built our wealth and lifestyle on in this country which has always been about a far go for all. This legislation gives the capital in our country all of the power.
So we can go back on history as much as we like and we can call politicians all the names under the sun but from my assessment Australia has changed dramatically and the person that is responsible for that is
John Howard.
His government has been proven time and time again to be ruthless and will do whatever they have to do to stay in power including hipping up the terror argument, manipulate oil prices change media laws so he can control what is in the media, so I will repeat my initial advice,
Think About It People Don’t Be Coned Vote This Howard Government Out
Thanks
BBB
P/S Emo your responce is a cop-out.
AnswerID:
200434
Follow Up By: madfisher - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 20:30
Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 20:30
It is ludicous to blame house prices on
John Howard and simplistic. Supply and demand and real estate agents drive house prices. You need to get some fresh air and get those brain cells working
Pete
FollowupID:
459647
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 22:18
Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 22:18
Your conspiracy theories don't wash BBB, you sit too long with a drama writer. Think you are getting to be the tool mate.
FollowupID:
459685
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 22:39
Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 22:39
No worries BBB I'm with you
"Think About It People Don’t Be Coned Vote This Howard Government Out"
People must live in the dark ages to think the government has got nothing to do with. ha
This is all the plan dumb down enough people and they win every time.
You can see the non thinkers by there responses LOL...
Richard Kovac AMWU. ALP. AFS.
FollowupID:
459909
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 22:57
Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 22:57
......... and yours Richard? Prejudices? AMWU. ALP. AFS.
FollowupID:
459911
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 23:05
Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 23:05
No No N o not me
(had to look that up in the dictionary)
I'm open to all
views not just
mine..
Richard
FollowupID:
459914
Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 23:42
Tuesday, Oct 24, 2006 at 23:42
LOL JohnR, looks like we have a few lifetime subscribers to 'Direct Action' amongst us :))))) Fair enough. It's good to have diverse
views on any subject.
FollowupID:
459921
Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 00:36
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 00:36
I have to agree with BBB on his "vote the Howard Govt out".
I would however reiterate my point (albeit not clearly made earlier) that the emphasis is Howard out, and not necessarily Beasley in. The fact that we have Beasley as the "other option" IS the lesser of two evils.
As long as we all put the greens last so we can retain access to "OUR" land, Beasley is probably the better option (less of a puppet to the US, more independant in regional affairs, putting the 90% in front of the 10%, etc.
FollowupID:
459928
Follow Up By: Bware (Tweed Valley) - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:51
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:51
Conspiracy theory? It's no theory; the world leaders are aliens. You're all aliens. The kids are pretending to be asleep but I know they are reading my mind. Red wine shields my thoughts so I'm safe at the moment but I can't fall asleep in case they insert the transmitter in my head. I think the dog is on to me.....
FollowupID:
459932
Follow Up By: Member - BBB - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:19
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:19
Bware
You just lost me
BBB
FollowupID:
459942
Follow Up By: The Landy - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:42
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:42
If I'm reading some of these responses correctly then there are some amongst us that suggest the Howard government is deliberately trying to keep oil/petrol prices high as some sort of conspiracy.
If that is the view, could someone explain to me the thinking behind that view as it does not appear to have a lot of logic. If I was a politician trying to be re-elected I would be trying to garner the support of the masses......the masses buy fuel and aré not happy with the high price. If the price is something he could exercise any real control over then surely he would, any politician would.
So what is the great conspiracy?
FollowupID:
459947
Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 07:43
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 07:43
Landy,
hahahaha you know it's the role of the bourgeois to keep the masses down. Who said logic had anything to do with this discussion?
Enough comrade, I'm off to the barricades LOLOL
FollowupID:
459953
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 07:48
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 07:48
Ah, yes Al, I am sure they are and probably subscribers to the Red October, nearly regretting it's October passing and want to now continue into November. Who is playing Sean Connery?
I reckon you are right Landy, and it is unfortunate for my friends in the grape industry they are offering red wine as a substitute. It mightn't get the 4by as far but it does wonders for inventive thoughts. Mind you 9 Coronas might do the job equally
well.
Beasley as the lesser of two evils? He is twice the size, and his focus on just being contrary to good management is confounding me. Now he may just trigger Red October.
FollowupID:
459957
Follow Up By: The Landy - Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:35
Wednesday, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:35
Hi
John
Not sure I'm following your comment on Red Wine correctly, but in any case I have grave concerns that via bio-diesel production we will end up linking the price of basic crops to the price of a commodity (oil) which is definitely in a long-term uptrend that will see oil prices substantially higher than they are now.
Whilst the production of bio-diesel is currently priced on a cost-of-production basis, at some point of time the price will start to mirror rising oil prices and the price of refined fuels, whilst possibly still being offered as a cheaper alternative.
This will see the cost of basic food items increase as we divert basic crops into the production of bio-diesel............
Bio-diesel is seen as a saviour by many, and there is some merit in it, but beware the hidden cost.
Offered as food for thought!
FollowupID:
459965
Follow Up By: silkwood - Thursday, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01
Thursday, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01
Good call, Landy. The dollar price of bio-fuels is like everything else (oil, aluminium, coal etc.) in that it doesn't (can't) take into account the cost of it's impact (environmental, social). So yes, if largely used as fuel there will be a time when its price fluctuates in relation to companion fuels (oil, gas etc). The only time bio-fuels become attractive is when lobbies convince governments to support them. In reality if we utilise this fuel extensively it will consume vast areas of agricultural land and significantly impact upon food prices. It is a poor idea in the short term and idiocy in the long term, even though it sounds quite environmentally friendly on the surface.
Good post, lots of heat and humour (Gramps pretending old Jo B-P had anything good about him, others pretending Howard has principles, yet more making outlandish statements about Beasley being a potential leader!).
Only sensible comments have been about red wine keeping the thought beams at bay, at least we know that one is true.
Cheers,
Mark
FollowupID:
460183
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Thursday, Oct 26, 2006 at 22:43
Thursday, Oct 26, 2006 at 22:43
Landy, on reading my post again on the wine industry, where there is a major glut the industry is trying to offer wine for anything including spirit that could fire an engine. I was also hanging a bit on the pinko responses above. Having a laugh you may say.
On the bio diesel front, the Australian oil seed industry is in melt down with canola crops and everything else that may have gone to feed us in
ruins from the dry conditions and resultant frosts.
There are numerous people selling their canola plants baled as
hay for stock feed industry the season is a shocker. One guy I was talking to was talking of getting 5% of his actual business revenue this year from crop sales and I know others could be worse with no income. In the acricultural businesses there are huge costs that have to be met out of the income, so count some pretty massive financial losses to Australian farmers. Mark, the environment cost will be massive too, but hopefuly that can be recovered after some time.
FollowupID:
460331