Legality of rear view cameras

Submitted: Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:12
ThreadID: 38735 Views:3275 Replies:6 FollowUps:3
This Thread has been Archived
I have a response back from the safety council re rear view cameras. It is a bit non committal but appears to me that providing that you have standard external mirrors on the tow vehicle that a camera should be OK. It is the key element of the regulation that is important.

"The requirement for rear vehicle mirrors on vehicles is contained
within regulation 29(1) of the Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Rules
2002. This regulation states that "A rear vision mirror or mirrors must
be fitted to a motor vehicle as required by the rule so that a driver of
the vehicle can clearly see by reflection the road behind the vehicle
and any vehicle following or overtaking.

The key elements of this regulation are that the driver must be able to
see both the road and vehicles behind as well as vehicles that are
overtaking."

The grey area is the following legislation.
"regulation 36 of the Vehicle standards regs) prohibits the installation of a television receiver or visual display unit (VDU) in a vehicle if any part of the image on the screen is visible to the driver from the normal driving position."
"The reason for this ban on TVs and VDUs in moving vehicles is that the
screens can pose a distraction risk to the driver."

A television receiver or VDU may not be the same as a rear view screen.
if it is interpreted as a VDU then it is illegal but if it is a rear view screen then it is legal.
The verbal summary given to me is use common sense.
If you have a view to the rear, can see an over taking vehicle and the screen is no more distraction than a rear view mirror then it will be acceptable.

I will continue on this campaign as I believe the intention needs be much clearer.

Neil
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:20

Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:20
Neil,

Thanks for that.....it is still a mute point and I have recently fitted a new switch (ON/OFF/ON), so that I can have the screen on full-time or part-time (only when I select reverse).

To say that the screen could be a distraction to the driver (as you rightly point out), is total bullchit.............
AnswerID: 200403

Reply By: Kumunara (NT) - Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:30

Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:30
The following should assist. As the rearview screen is a driver's aid it is legal.:

ROAD TRAFFIC (VEHICLE STANDARDS) RULES 1999 - REG 42
42—Television receivers and visual display units

(1) A television receiver or visual display unit must not be installed in a vehicle so any part of the image on the screen is visible to the driver from the normal driving position.

(2) However, subrule (1) does not apply to:

(a) a television receiver or visual display unit that cannot be operated when the vehicle is moving; or

(b) a driver's aid in any vehicle or a destination sign in a bus.

Examples of driver's aids—

1 Closed-circuit television security cameras.

2 Dispatch systems.

3 Navigational or intelligent highway and vehicle system equipment.

4 Rearview screens.

5 Ticket-issuing machines.

6 Vehicle monitoring devices.

(3) A television receiver, or visual display unit, and its associated equipment in a vehicle must be securely mounted in a position that:

(a) does not obscure the driver's view of the road; and

(b) does not impede the movement of a person in the vehicle.

Life's great and it just keeps getting better

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 200405

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:31

Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 22:31
Im waiting to see someone get done for privacy laws with em... Why not, in this bleep ed up world now... Its an invasion of someones privacy.. Same as most shizzle now
AnswerID: 200406

Follow Up By: Neil & Pauline - Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 23:30

Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 23:30
I only forgot the camera once whilst travelling with wife and mother-in-law. Went round the back of the van for wee wee came back to drive off and no camera on. Wife turned it off.
enough said.

Neil

0
FollowupID: 459495

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 23:36

Sunday, Oct 22, 2006 at 23:36
LOL Flashing SWMBO's Boss !!! Bet that went down well hahahahaha
0
FollowupID: 459497

Reply By: Mike Harding - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:04

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:04
What about if you have a VDU mounted within the drivers field of vision but it's camera is trained on the rear view mirror?
AnswerID: 200424

Reply By: The Fox - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:22

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:22
One of the key phrases is "and any vehicle following or overtaking".

I have a camear on the rear of my van. It does not show vehciles overtaking the van and without extension mirrors i can't see them beside me. In my situation, particularly im multi lane traffic, the camera is an addition to and not a replacement for good extension mirrors.

If your van is wider than your vehicle, a camera is not the total solution.

Trevor
AnswerID: 200448

Reply By: troopyman - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:16

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:16
Thats why when installing reversing cameras they should only activate when reversing . Simple .
AnswerID: 200455

Follow Up By: Motherhen - Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 23:19

Monday, Oct 23, 2006 at 23:19
troopyman, some of the comments above refer to caravans. They are a great safety bonus when driving along as you have a very clear picture of what is behind you, from when approaching in the distance, to when the vehicle is "hidden" from the view of even the wide mirrors when right behind. We want the when driving forward, rather than backwards.

Monitoring the rear view screen, which some people have as a substitute for the rear view mirror, is no more dangerous than keeping an eye on the rear view mirror - essential for safety.
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 459698

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)