Sunday, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:04
Agree with what others have said. Certainly higher
fuel consumption in petrol, but you need to keep that in perspective, for the reasons others have given.
We had a similar dilemma when looking last year for a 95-series Prado. I would have liked a diesel, but they weren't easy to find and cost several thou more than petrol equivalents. Ended up with 2000 VX with 95k on it for less than any diesel model.
Is the 99 model you are looking at the update one (fog lights in bumper etc)? Not much difference in the GXL, but VX and Grande models from 99 on had ABS & traction control, which I think are worthwhile. (Also other things less significant, like 6 stacker CD, climate control A/C with rear outlets, etc). Airbags were standard on VX and Grande, but optional on RV and GXL. TC not available, even as an option, pre-1999 or on RV or GXL post-1999. Without TC, rear diff lock would be worth considering (the LSD is useless).
I have been very happy with ours. It is rugged and reliable, easy to drive, comfortable and surprisingly capable off-road, even without
suspension mods. 159L tanks are a great feature.
Fuel average is about 14L/100km overall, from around 11.5L/100km hwy cruising to 25+ on low range tracks.
For outback trips, consider budgeting for things like new tyres,
snorkel, bullbar,
driving lights,
suspension upgrade, cargo barrier. I would also look at a reversing camera or sensors (visibility is poor). We got Sand Grabber mats and they have been handy too.
Two cheap mods that are worthwhile are diff breather extensions and changing the electric window wiring so that they work without the key in the ignition. See Land Cruiser Owners On-line for more on this, and lots of other helpful info. (
Well done Phil and others!)
Good luck!
Des
AnswerID:
204397