Wednesday, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:12
And just to blot my copybook even worse...
I hate tailgaters too.
They are not trying to overtake, they probably just have lousy eyesight and need to be close to you so they can see you and feel safe. Of course that means they shouldn't be driving at all, but who am I to determine that?
Occasionally, when I am seriously concerned about one, I take the attitude that I should drive defensively.
Normally that means drive at sufficient distance from the vehicle in front that you can safely stop, or take what action is required as a result of their actions. The three second rule applies, or roughly 1 car length per 10kph is good enough for me most of the time.
With tailgaters, since they don't appear to be applying the recommended discipline, I am pleased to do it for them.
That means that I gradually slow down to such a speed that
the gap they leave is sufficient for them to take whatever avoidance action might be required of them.
Nothing aggressive, just gentle braking (to show my stop lights, that's the law).
When
the gap is so small that I can't see their headlights, that probably means we sohould only be doing 10 kph.
Of course, at a lower speed, they then have the best, safe opportunity to overtake me.
When
the gap is sufficient for the speed we are doing, then after a brief time to ensure their driving has stabilised, and they have chosen not to overtake, then I will gradually speed up, monitoring
the gap so that my speed and their gap is always within the safety recommendations.
Gap reduces, my speed reduces. Gap increases, my speed increases. But at any time I get the impression they wish to overtake, then I keep everything constant so they have the best opportunity.
It works for trucks too, and after they go down a few gears, I find that my gradual increase in speed tends to be faster than theirs.
What is wrong with that? (Unless you are the ****wit behind me!)
Ken
AnswerID:
205085
Follow Up By: Matt Davis - Wednesday, Nov 15, 2006 at 17:32
Wednesday, Nov 15, 2006 at 17:32
Gottabjerkin:
I once had a person do that to me, but a bit quicker than you describe. I accelerated, and let my front end do the talking. I was in my work ute, and insurance covered me. It was worth every cent of excess and lost use of my ute just to see the look on the idiot's face when I told him that I did it on purpose.
What is wrong with that? (Unless you're the ****wit in front of me)
Matt
FollowupID:
465105
Follow Up By: gottabjoaken - Thursday, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:16
Thursday, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:16
There has to be one!
Yes, Matt,
and it might interest you to know that for criminal offences such as assault or criminal damage involving a motor vehicle, such as you describe, in South Australia (at least) there is a mandatory penalty of 12 months
suspension of your driving licence.
It would be worth the annoyance of taking the compensation from your insurance company to see the look on your face when the magistrate told you that!
Ken
FollowupID:
465237