Please, need to buy second hand 4wd, here are my preferences
Submitted: Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:53
ThreadID:
40223
Views:
5582
Replies:
7
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
Sonnymac
Hi guys, I'm looking for a second hand 4wd car, according to my preference, this is my short list:
Money to spend <15k $
Km Max <200.000
Good economy
Models:
Toyota 4 Runners
Mitsubishi Challenger
Nissan Pathfinder.
Looking for a reliable car with an automatic transmission and good economy,petrol, need for light 4wd.
Please help me guys, I'll move to Oz next month from Italy.
Vanni
Reply By: Markymark - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:26
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:26
Hi Vanni,
In road tests from new, the Challenger was normally more economical than comparable petrol 4wd's and you should find an earlier one in that price range too. They're based on Pajero running gear and will certainly handle 'light 4wd'.
Depending on how 'light' your 4wdriving will be, you might want too look at a softroader for economy. Usually petrol and automatic don't go
well together for economy in anything above a softroader. I've been out a few times with a guy in a Mitsubishi Outlander. He has fitted some mud terrain tyres but there's no
suspension lift etc and it's amazing where that little thing will go. Hopefully you'll get some economy facts here. My 3.4L petrol Prado automatic uses 13L/100km on highway, 15L when bush touring with some low range and anything up to 20L when around town.
Cheers,
Mark.
AnswerID:
209570
Reply By: Keith_A (Qld) - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:40
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:40
Hi Vanni - Have you considered the Subaru Forrester?
A very capable and economic 4WD - from a manufacturer renown for reliability.
We have the older 2Ltr version, and our model has the high/low transfer case.
Clearly not for heavy towing or hard-core 4wd, but it can get to 99% of OZ.
Have a look at this site : offroadsubarus.com/
Worth serious consideration.........................Keith
AnswerID:
209573
Reply By: Barnesy - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:48
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 10:48
Take as many as you can for test drives and decide for yourself from there. Agree that petrol autos aren't the best for economy.
AnswerID:
209574
Reply By: chisel - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 11:04
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 11:04
I test-drove both the Challenger and Pathfinder before buying the pathie. The challenger was based on the Triton ute I think. It was much more truck-like than the pathie. But perhaps that's ok for you.
I suspect the challenger is slightly more economical than the pathie but I doubt it would be significant enough to worry about.
I think the pathfinders are pretty reliable. Challengers probably are too.
The 4-runner only has 2 doors. Perhaps you should add a Toyota Surf to the shortlist although they are mainly diesel I think.
Pathfinder's club www.pcoa.org.au/forumtemp/index.php
AnswerID:
209575
Follow Up By: Member - Nick (Kununurra) - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 13:14
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 13:14
The old 4 Runners only had two doors,since 1990 they have had 4 doors and are a top 4WD.
FollowupID:
469647
Follow Up By: Martyn (WA) - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 16:04
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 16:04
Chisel,
The Tojo Rolex Surf might not be the best intro to someone outside Australia, it's in the price range you're right, it's got all the fruit and providing nothing goes wrong things would be good.
I sold a surf a couple of months ago for virtually nothing because of people perception about repairs costs and parts. They where right................... Parts, repair costs and insurance cost more on a Surf being an import, something to bear in mind. This is a personal opinion others may vary.
FollowupID:
469663
Follow Up By: madfisher - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 18:10
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 18:10
I have a 4runner with the 22r motor and would recommend them , a bit slow but ecomical for petrol, my best is 10l per 100ks and that was down bells line of road and up the
putty rd. The v6 gave a lot more trouble with half the service life. My next vehicle will most likly be a challenger because of their excellant ecomony and most importent they are mechanically simple which is why I have discounted the pathie. When buying 2nd hand you have to be more astute. I would also consider a jackeroo in manual only for better ecomony
I recently seen a 97 Jack advertised with 87000ks for $13000.00 should be a good buy IF it has been looked after
Goodluck Pete
FollowupID:
469676
Reply By: Member - 'Lucy' - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 11:37
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 11:37
Well Vannie its like this.
The experts on anything and everything on this
forum - BONZ, Roachie & Truckster - all swear by Nissan.
Who could argue against such August, breadth and range of 4WD knowledge and experience.
So in view of that it would have to be the Pathfinder.
AnswerID:
209578
Reply By: Sonnymac - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 19:27
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 19:27
ThanX guys for all og your suggestion.
I'd prefer to go with AUTO because I'll already need to accustomed to drive on the right side; but tell me in percentage, how Auto will influence on good fuel economy, if you know what I mean?
AnswerID:
209631
Reply By: madfisher - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 22:28
Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 22:28
10 to 20 percent depending on engine and trancmission. I have heard on Jackeroos the diff is 200ks per
tank but someone else may have personal experience. THe latest
5 and 6 speed autos are awesome though but above your price pange
Cheers Pete
AnswerID:
209673