Driving at altitude
Submitted: Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 15:05
ThreadID:
40466
Views:
2437
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Mike Harding
I was recently on Davies Plain in the High Country at an altitude of a little over 1700m (about 5500 feet) and it occurred to me that my fuel
tank may be under considerable pressure, I released the cap and sure enough petrol vapour started to emerge at a considerable rate so I retightened the cap until the release slowed but it took about 3 or 4 minutes for the
tank and atmospheric pressures to equalise. Now I have driven at higher altitudes than this in the Alps in Europe and it’s never occurred to me before about the
tank pressurising and I haven’t had any problems.
Questions:
Was I being over cautious (I imagine the manufacturers consider this during design – probably :) or is this something we should keep in mind? Are there others issues to keep in mind at altitude – I know engine power drops.
Mike Harding
mike_harding@fastmail.fm
Reply By: Kiwi Kia - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 15:30
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 15:30
Hi Mike, 5,500 feet is not very high. Most of the continental USA is about that altitude and you can drive to around 12,000 feet near Denver in the family car with no special arangements or precautions. As you say you do lose some power but these days most vehicles have heaps of hp and unless you are towing you don't really notice it. Full throttle altitude is about 7,000 feet so after that it would be nice if you could get more oxygen or alter the mixture & timing on a petrol engine to maintain power. I don't know what was happening when you opened your
tank filler cap, did it suck in air? That is what I would expect it to do and it may have sounded like air was escapeing when it was actually being sucked in.
AnswerID:
210991
Follow Up By: Wayne-o - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 16:22
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 16:22
12000, hmmm, hypoxia!!!!
FollowupID:
471034
Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:01
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:01
Kiwi Kia
You been up over there too on I-70 and through the tunnel , what a magic drive, Love the way they stuck West bound lanes on the side of the mountain, like a bridge for
miles.
Doug
FollowupID:
471079
Follow Up By: Member - Tonester (VIC) - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:55
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:55
wayne-o, 12000 isn't a prob esp in short period - a little conditioning might be needed for extended times.
FollowupID:
471086
Follow Up By: Kiwi Kia - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:03
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:03
Yeah Doug, Ecellent road up to the top of Mt Evens. I was walking across a
carpark to reach the
toilet block when it started to rain so I started to run, bad decision, completely ran out of air and was bent over gasping after about ten yards. And then bugg... me a group of people on bicycles turn up and make me look a real wimp !
Finger nails and lips don't normally start turning blue (hypoxia) till about 14 - 15,000 feet when sitting still. Makes it difficult to see the early warning signs at night
FollowupID:
471103
Follow Up By: Wayne-o - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:35
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:35
thanks for the lesson on hypoxia....been flying for many years, i know what it's all about.
FollowupID:
471119
Reply By: Wayne-o - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 15:52
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 15:52
obviously the tanks is sealed, and you would have done this at or near sea level, therefore you had sea level pressure in your
tank, and as you drove up the air pressure is reduced, therefore there is more pressure in you
tank than outside, pressure flows from high to low therefore out of your
tank. its like taking a basketball on a plane. i guess the only way to prevent this would be every thousand feet say, get out and release the pressure, the only consideration is that if the pressure was to get too great it could crack a weld, but i doubt it at that level.
Also your engine power will drop, as the air loses density, your manifold pressure will fall, and without a turbo there is no way to retain rated power. As for full throttle height, i remeber from my flying days, full trottle height on an N/A plane was around 5000' but this is where you want the beuty of being able to close the waste
gate and bump the power back up......hope this helps
Wayne-o
AnswerID:
210992
Follow Up By: Member - John R (NSW) - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:01
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:01
Wayne, I'd be more worried about the
tank collapsing in on itself when he came back down to sea-level :-))
I believe the
tank does/should indeed vent so that the pressure is close to equal with atmosphere (give or take a couple of psi).
FollowupID:
471053
Follow Up By: Wayne-o - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:18
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:18
well, yeah thats a good point, your right through i think it should be vented! i remember getting a block vent once in a piece of S..T C210......ha those where the days
FollowupID:
471058
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:53
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:53
The
tank must be vented in the inward direction otherwise it would collapse as the fuel was used. The issue occurs as atmospheric pressure drops and the differential increases because the
tank was previously equalised at sea-level. I think Robin and Luch have described the situation. However as Kiwi points out 5500ft is not very high (although it is for Oz! :) so "I guess" it's been taken into account in design calculations.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
471066
Reply By: Robin - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 16:13
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 16:13
This can be correct Mike.
Petrol
tank is meant to run always at a slightly high pressure , and equalize through charcoal cannister.
When engine turned off most tank/pump systems now have an outlet valve which shuts off maintaining this higher pressure - this makes starting easier next time
as don't have to re-pressuize system.
When going to higher alltitude a bigger pressure differential occurs.
So more whoosh.
I don't know your car type , so this is generic , but as also for power
engine management systems compenstate for lower air pressure and you
should notice the small power drop unless foot flat to floor. You
may notice foot in slightly different place on accelerator, this is the giveaway.
It can take a few minutes to compenstate though.
In early more primitve management systems, I've had the case of hard
and not starting unless air filter removed to give more air, until compensation.
Worth noting.
Robin Miller
AnswerID:
210997
Reply By: luch - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:01
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 17:01
Nothing much that you can do about it !
The fuel caps are made so when the
tank contracts at night or in cold weather it can suck air in, but it CANNOT release air this is purposly designed like this.
The reason is so you dont have fuel vapors being released fire hazards
Can't realy over pressurise the
tank they are reinforced with Baffels inside, swelll pot, ect Part of the construction they are quite strong
You would blow a breather hose or an o-ring on the
tank if the pressure was too high anyway
AnswerID:
211014
Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:34
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:34
Mike
Went up over
Hotham Heights from Bairnsdale to
Bright in 1969 151
miles ,done in 3 hours in my 1969 GT Cortina at 6030 ft it was gutless , had no life , I do believe that when the 1970 London-Mexico cars were in the Andes they made adjustments to the Carby's to compensate for the thinner atmosphere .
1 Carburettors Altering the mixture is a problem which may require consideration if long sections are run at high altitude or if numerous high passes are included in the route. Approximately 20% power loss will occur at 6,000 ft, with considerable richening of the mixture.
On the 1970 London - Mexico World Cup Rally (with many
miles at 15,000 ft), some cars fitted with SU carburettors had a device fitted which enabled the driver to weaken the mixture from the dashboard. Details of this very simple device can be obtained from Don Law, ex-SU Racing Department, who was involved in the original design.
The alternative is to carry weaker jets or needles and change them for the higher sections of the route. On an SU carburettor, a needle change would take at least 5 minutes per carburettor, if you are not tired or suffering from altitude sickness!
www.hero.org.uk/info/appendixa.html
Doug
AnswerID:
211059
Reply By: Member - Tonester (VIC) - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:57
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 19:57
ever seen a bag of chippies blowing like a balloon going from Melb to the hills??
AnswerID:
211063
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 20:46
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 20:46
Yep. Noticed that too :)
FollowupID:
471098
Reply By: Richard Kovac - Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:34
Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 21:34
Yes to much time on your hands ..LOL.. I think
AnswerID:
211088
Reply By: geocacher (djcache) - Tuesday, Dec 19, 2006 at 00:44
Tuesday, Dec 19, 2006 at 00:44
Given that it has to survive without bursting to pass the crash test in ADR's I'd very much doubt you will ever see a problem with the insignificant pressure developed by altitude.
A sled hitting the rear of your vehicle at 56kmh for ADR generates A LOT more
tank pressure than that.
Dave
AnswerID:
211118
Reply By: Shaker - Tuesday, Dec 19, 2006 at 15:25
Tuesday, Dec 19, 2006 at 15:25
Never thought about the fuel
tank, must admit I have been worried about the Twisties packets exploding though!
AnswerID:
211195