Buy an 80 or 100 series

Submitted: Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 16:43
ThreadID: 42345 Views:3654 Replies:17 FollowUps:20
This Thread has been Archived
Hi again,

My wife and I have been looing around and can afford an 80 series or early 100 series. We like the live axle front end and 4.2 TD. Are there any issues which we should be aware of that could help us decide. Do the 80 and 100 have the same running gear? We like the outside of both.

Thanks in anticipation

Dan.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Sea-Dog - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 16:46

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 16:46
80 will be cheaper unless you are looking for a multi valve turbo diesel then you will be paying a heap for it anyway but the motors are pretty hot property and you won't regret the drive you get out of it..

Having said that though the 100 seems to be that much more comfortable and more up to date style wise..

I think I would be looking at a diesel 100 and look at the gas or turbo options.. go the live axle as opposed to the IFS...
AnswerID: 221905

Follow Up By: dj386 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:56

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:56
Hi,

My wife likes the loks of the 100 series more, though I guess at the end of the day will have to assess everything, including price. Do you know when the 24 valve mtr came out in the 80 series.

Time will tell.

Thanks

Dan.
0
FollowupID: 482760

Reply By: fisho64 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 17:24

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 17:24
pretty sure you cant get live axle and turbo diesel together in the 100 series.
It'll be aftermarket turbo for that combination.
AnswerID: 221915

Follow Up By: dj386 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:54

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:54
You're right. You can get 100 gxl non-td live axle, but not GXL td live axle.
Thanks for writing
Dan
0
FollowupID: 482759

Reply By: png62 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 17:34

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 17:34
G'day Dan,
I went through this exercise just over a year ago. Bought an early 100 Series Diesel with an AXT Turbo (as Sea-Dog suggests). Solid front axle is definitely the go if you are serious about "hard" 4wding - don't listen to the suggestion that IFS is more comfortable and handles better. Heck, if my 100 handled any better on fast rough dirt roads, I might take up rally driving. You won't regret either model but be very particular about the previous service records. I have yet to have mine "stuck" anywhere and it really has "been there and done that", the axle articulation and wheel travel is amazing. I have to admit though that the 2" lift and 33" Coopers help on the "offf road" side of things. Go for as late a model as you can afford if you want to have the vehicle for more than 4-5 years and though the prices are up there, you won't regret parting with your hard earned. Have a plan about the type of accesories you will need for your style of 4wding and cost them into the equation too. "Bit of a 'cruiser man me-self" - I'm a die hard convert now mate.
Cheers
John
AnswerID: 221918

Follow Up By: dj386 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:02

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:02
Thanks for writing back jonh,

I've found a 11/1995 model 80 series factory td with 250ks, toyota recall new big end bearings at 190ks, Berrimah Diesel Service (inc injectors) at 220, ss water tank under body, hot shower, alloy wheels, arb roof rack, bbar, uhf and side band radios for between 20 and 25 thousnad dollars - probably get for 21,000. It's from a meticulous friend. Have seen 1999, 2000 and 2001 non turbo gxl's for 26-29000. I could offer less. Still mulling it over. Do you know if the 100 solid axles have the same problems as the 100 IFS - read a few posts about 100's having diff trouble.
ANy thoughts?

It's a hard decision to make. I like Toyota's (had a couple of hilux when young) and now with 2 kids and another on the way, want a family wagon.

THanks

Dan.
0
FollowupID: 482749

Follow Up By: Richard W (NSW) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 00:16

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 00:16
I'm aware of a fellow who has done two front diffs on a late model solid front end 100, but he hammers it on hard tracks.
0
FollowupID: 482781

Reply By: Ann 40 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 20:45

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 20:45
Hi dan we have an 80 series 97 model and could not be happier with it.Power wise i'm very happy,it's a natural diesel but i have fitted an air snorkel and a set off extactors.The latter being the best.It has improved it to a gear better on hills.I travelled with a mate in his 100 and on the hills around tassie we were the same but after fitting extractors the 80 pulled away quite easier.on cruise staying around 95 to 100 ks an hr we acheive approx 24.5 mpg.Another cruiserman......
AnswerID: 221960

Follow Up By: dj386 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:52

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:52
Thanks for the input. Will keep learning and looking.
Dan.
0
FollowupID: 482758

Reply By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 21:34

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 21:34
Hi Dan,
most of the running gear in the 100s came from the 80s,IMHO there is no real benefit in getting a later one,unless you want gadgets(more too stuff up later)
I previously owned a factory turbo 80s which went like a scalded cat and consistently returned 23-25 MPG.
They developed a bad reputation for bottom end failures and i'm not aware of how to check to see if one you find is good/no good with out taking sump off.
Constant 4WD models (gxl sahara) flogged out CV joints,if on a test drive engage centre diff put on full lock (left and right) move forward just a metre listen for clicking,that clicking is a $600 job.
I now own a std 100s,naturally aspirated,and can tell you first hand the difference between the two(body/chassis) is not much!.Headlight for 05 100s = $760, 80s on the other hand can be picked up anywhere for $15 they are just normal rectangular jobs,and can be easily improved on.
It is a BIG step back going from T/D to a n/a. . . . . . . . . hang on .. . . . . I cant type thru the tears. . . . . . . .but the 1HZ can be made to go as hard as (old) 1HD T (for a substantial fee) personally I would far prefer factory power than the modded
Later 80s(with the bigger grille) had the 24 valve t/d which went the same but used less fuel, expect 1000 ks on the two std tanks (135l), driven, not spared!
I don't think any 100s live axle came ex factory with a turbo(if they did there would be only a few)didn't come out until 02 (T/D s) because toyota didn't want a repeat of the early T/D 80s bearing failures.
heaps of parts/acc. for both,can easily spent $20k just on accessories

Shane,yota4me
AnswerID: 221968

Follow Up By: dj386 - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:48

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 22:48
Hi Shane,
Thanks for writing. It's a really hard decision to make. Good point about the cost of spare parts. I'm borrowing a 91 commodore at the moment with 450ks on the clock and while the mtr is stil going strong because of good maintenance, the rest of the car is falling to bits - the wiper switch fell apart, just worn out, other internal parts are breaking off, disintegrating. If I were to get say a 1995/96 cruiser, how many years are left in the body/exterior/interior?
I know a little what you mean about the non td diesel. I owned a 2.8 4runner and then leased a 3.0 ltr patrol. Big difference.
Thanks for the test drive tip. Hopefully will be doing that in the next week or so.
That's pretty good mileage out of the 80. Why did you end up going to the 100 series?

Thanks again mate,

Dan.
0
FollowupID: 482756

Reply By: Member - Barnesy (SA) - Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 23:56

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 at 23:56
Not answering your question directly but have you looked at a Patrol? For the cost of an early model 100 series you could get a Patrol several years newer. Or the same year for less money. All of them come with live axles, and the 4.2 diesel is an excellent engine. Not much goes wrong with them and they are a good buy. The extra you pay for is the Toyota name, not much else.

Barnesy
AnswerID: 222006

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:00

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:00
"The extra you pay for is the Toyota name, not much else."

Toyota have proven better at backing up their product, see comment about the 1HDT bottom end repair at 190k as opposed to ZD30 failures and associated dramas?
0
FollowupID: 482799

Follow Up By: Member - Robert A (QLD) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:06

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:06
I would have to agree with Fisho64.
You get more for your money than just the name. There is a reason every station out bush has landcruisers and not patrol.

Reliability, strength, ease of spares and resale value.

Rob
0
FollowupID: 482803

Follow Up By: Member - Barnesy (SA) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 15:49

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 15:49
I'm not saying that Toyotas aren't good and they deserve their good reputation. We are talking about second hand vehicles, for example, what's better value a 1993 80 series diesel, or a 1997 GQ 4.2 diesel? Same price, usually an extra 100 000km on the 80 series. I know what is better value for money. Tell me that 4.2 diesel Nissan donks aren't good and will not last forever. And they also have a stronger drivetrain. Yet the 80 series has more interior space and is more refined.

Each to his own.

Barnesy
0
FollowupID: 482901

Reply By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:12

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:12
well the biggest problem with TD 80s is they are waaaaaay overpriced you can be the judge if they are worth it. The vehicle you speak of sounds ok with the accesorys but it suggeststs it has been used for its intended desighn. Keep in mind all repairs to a tojo start at 1k and are rounded up to the nearest k so Dont make the mistake of thinking fixng thisn that will only cost $500 - 1k coz it will be more like3-4k. Have you tought of a ute - they are far more capable and tougher out bush with the live axles. No station wagon will get close to the places a ute will out (without majour damage)
AnswerID: 222015

Reply By: Member - Robert A (QLD) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:01

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:01
Hi Dan.

We have owned several Landcruiser's, We now have a 100 series T/D with IFS.
It is definitely the best I have owned for comfort and handling on any road condition.

I have a couple of mates that have problem with the front ends. They are very serious fourwheel drivers and they drive them hard. In my book to hard on a standard vehicle. Ours is just over 12 month old and we have put it through some pretty hard going.

It really depends on how much and how hard of 4wd driving you do. But on the black stuff and dirt roads the IFS is far better. Especially on those corrugation's heading into a corner.

Cheers
Rob
AnswerID: 222021

Reply By: Rock Crawler - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:07

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:07
it all depends on what $$$ you want to spend , a TD Cruiser will set you back 30 to 50 k depending on year and kms
AnswerID: 222036

Reply By: Member - Karl - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:56

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:56
The 80 Series and early 100 Series had the same motor and running gear the main change was the body shape. Buy a factory fitted turbo in either the 80 or 100 Series is going to be expensive.

Might pay to buy a normaly asperated diesel and fit an aftermarket turbo - might save a few dollars.

Karl
AnswerID: 222057

Reply By: Sea-Dog - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:14

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:14
When you are looking at the later model 80 series turbo diesel the big thing to look for is if the motor is a multi valve diesel or not... The multi valve is reputably an awesome motor and will cost more to buy but is worth the money...

Computer controlled injection etc means if you are still not happy with performance you can do a D-Tronic chip or LPG conversion and the economy will probably get better to top it off...

You would have to be lucky to find a multi valve for the right price though.. they are generally over priced..
AnswerID: 222067

Follow Up By: dj386 - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:53

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:53
The 11/95 mod is a multi-valve. How many k's can we expect to get from a meticulously maintained engine. It now has 250 on it. Would it be unreasoable to hope for 500?

Thanks

Dan.
0
FollowupID: 482869

Follow Up By: Sea-Dog - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 18:29

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 18:29
for a well maintained engine 500 is not unreasonable.. I have a bit over 300 on mine and while it has rattles and bumps etc I think it is a long way from dying.. I had the compression tested around a year ago and it was still above (not by much but still above) what they say they came out with.

Bearings and valves etc would be what gives out so it would have to have been not only regularly serviced with regard to oil and filters but also with tuning and injectors.. again no reason why you wouldn't get 500 out of it though.. plenty of cars running around with more than 500 on the clock..

cheers
0
FollowupID: 482947

Reply By: Trevor R (QLD) - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 16:13

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 16:13
Hi Dan,

Just a side note, I think the turbo 80 you are talking about has a stronger gearbox than the later 100 series. It may be worth checking this more thoroughly. I spat out 2 sets of gears and was hearing similar noises again when I sold my 18 month old 100 series. I am led to believe the turbo 80 you speak of is a better all round vehicle than the 100 series I had.

But my GU is better than both the above vehicles HEHEHEHE

Cheers with beers, Trevor.
AnswerID: 222121

Follow Up By: Member - Robert A (QLD) - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 02:23

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 02:23
In your dreams
0
FollowupID: 483051

Follow Up By: Member - Barnesy (SA) - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:07

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:07
Haven't heard any bad things about 4.2 diesel Patrols. The 3 litre is a dud and I don't know why Nissan keep selling them. But at least if the engine goes, yeh it will be expensive but it won't cause an accident.

If the IFS on a 100 series goes when travelling at speed, I wouldn't want to be in the car. Also hear many stories about gearbox problems in cruisers. Compare the size of the box in the GQ to the 80 series. They also use a lighter Hilux front diff in the ute.

Whereas both Nissan and Toyota have their good and bad points, are Cruisers worth the extra cash? I wanted a Toyota but I'm so impressed with my GQ that my next fourby will be a GU.

Barnesy
0
FollowupID: 483109

Reply By: Middle Jeff - Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 20:30

Friday, Feb 16, 2007 at 20:30
Hi Dan

I drive an 80 with a turbo and love it, I know this is a different answer to the rest, but I have done several trips with a couple of friends and a few have the petrol ( and they are a great motor ) motors in a 100. On a big trip our fuel cost are so close to each others it did not make any difference, so I guess what I am saying is if you see the right cruiser and it has the petrol motor in it do not discount it too quickly.

I do not know if I would do it but I a not looking.

Have fun

Craig
AnswerID: 222171

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 15:29

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 15:29
if your not getting at leat 5l perhundred but closer to 10l per hundred better than your petrol mates then you have BIG problems in the fuellng department. on a run to Peth fom Kal my diesal uses 50L less than a mates petrol
0
FollowupID: 483134

Follow Up By: Middle Jeff - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 18:13

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 18:13
Hi Davoe

You are correct, but for that privilage we get to pay 10 to 20 cents per litre more.

That makes the cost about the same.

Have fun

Craig
0
FollowupID: 483168

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 18:23

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 18:23
not even close. even at 20cpl difference (which i have never seen) 80l @$1.30is $104 wheras 130l at $1.10 is $143.00. this is before you head bush where your 4by should be and diesal is the same price if not cheaper than ULP
0
FollowupID: 483169

Follow Up By: Middle Jeff - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 20:07

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 20:07
Hi Davoe

In NSW diesel is usually 12 to 15 cents dearer, at the beginning of last November it was the same price but they saw the error an whacked it up 20 cents.

If your figures are right I am way out as I thought the average difference between the two would have been no more than 15 - 20%, that with the extra initial cost of purchase. But your figures are well over 30%.

The trip we did we went to Bourke then followed the Darling River with a side trip to Broken Hill, Mungo and then down to the Murray River then back to Sydney and the two petrol's used only about $20 more than the two diesel's.
Have fun

Craig
0
FollowupID: 483181

Follow Up By: Member - Robert A (QLD) - Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:50

Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:50
I think you will find the biggest difference in fuel consumption between petrol and diesel is when you put the thing in low range for a few days.
Then tell me that there is much difference.

Rob
0
FollowupID: 483245

Follow Up By: Middle Jeff - Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 20:09

Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 20:09
Hi

I know all this and you are right, but it depends what you are going to do with it, and I don't know his needs.

In the 12 months I did 20,000 k's including the Vic high country and Cape York plus a lot of weekend trips and in all that I would have been lucky to go through 4 tanks of fuel in low range so over the life of my cruiser it probably would not make to much difference. If I was planing to do a lot of desert trips I would not think twice, it would be a diesel as I would want every bit of range I could get.

All I said was if you saw a petrol at the right price do not discount it, because that 4.5 petrol is probably the best one in any big 4wdrive.

Have fun

Craig
0
FollowupID: 483358

Reply By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 20:00

Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 20:00
Hi Dan,
I shouldv'e pointed out that I owned the 80s from '96 to '00 and sold it due to the fact I borrowed heavily to get it and took the first finance companys deal and end up paying toooo much too long and faced with the prospect of choosing whether to give it up or have it repoed,I gave it up.
I got the 100s last september ex Queensland rail and it had done 80000 ks in 8 months! full service history,balance of new car warranty(3yrs, 100k) with a few handy extras for around 60% of new car price.
As far as how long will the cruisers last,how long is piece of string?

Shane
AnswerID: 222337

Reply By: steve&anja - Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 18:33

Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 18:33
Hi dj386 my name is Steve hope I can help.
I bought a 80 series 6 years ago and used it to do tours across the top end for 4 years,It had a 1hz diesel no turbo (never seemed to need one) it did 2 tours a week averaged 1100 km per tour averaged 6 pax per tour tow a trailer that = 800 kg it never gave me trouble.
The tour industry now requirers the 100 series so I traded the 80 for a 2000 100 series well regretted that move however I now have a 2002 100 series it has 285000 km purring like a kitten. In fact I just did a 14000 km trip 1/2 way round Oz and as soon as i got home put it straight back to work.
The 80 and 100 series front and rear diffs are the same just different outer casings .
The reason why a late model Nissan is cheaper is because their resale is crap.
Im not sure about other states but spare parts for Toyota in the NT are real cheap.
You mentioned Berrimah in one of your posts is that Berrimah in Darwin.
Hope this helps.
AnswerID: 222736

Follow Up By: dj386 - Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:34

Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:34
Hi Steve, thanks for your reply mate. God to hear you've had a good run from the 80. Thanks for the diff info also. I have been looking at an 11/95 model with 260,000 k's on it. It has been maintained meticulously and is still very tight. It has the 24 valve TD mtr. I'm planning on doing 30'000kms per yer in the vehicle and hope to get 4-500,000kms out of it with good maintenance. Do you think that's unreasonable?
Berrimah Diesel was a crew on the south coast of Sydney that have done some work on the cruiser. I was born in Darwin and now Berrimah well. I can't wait to get a 4WD again and take my family back. I was up there two years ago for work, but didn't get much of a chance to enjoy.

Thanks again

Dan.
0
FollowupID: 483695

Reply By: steve&anja - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 14:04

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 14:04
H i dj386
Getting 500000 km out of a 1hz motor that is serviced every 5000km is no problem in fact I have seen a lot of tour vehicles with these on them and the only problem is re sale due to high kms. (my preference of oil for a motor with these sort of km is Penrite HPR Diesel a genuine oil and fuel filter yes change both every time ) Re grease wheel bearings and do al gear oils every 40000 weather they need it or not this may seem excessive but trust me I run 3 soon to be 4 Toyota's it simply just works.
AnswerID: 223161

Reply By: dj386 - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 14:43

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 14:43
Hi Everyone,

Thanks so much for all your valued feedback. I have looked at the 11/95 80 and am at present workign out finance to buy the vehicle. Hopefully in the next couple of weeks. My main worry was buying a vehicle of that mileage. But after your comments and others, I feel much more confident that there will be a good life left in the car. I have always changed the oil and filter every 5000 and I know it pays of. We are driving a 91 commodore that has 450 on the clock and still doesn't use oil. It has been serviced regularly and carefuly and is still going strong motor wise. The rest of the car is dying!!! Will just see how the banks go now.

Might see you on the road soon

Dan.
AnswerID: 223171

Sponsored Links