Prado VS Paj VS Pathfinder??
Submitted: Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 20:24
ThreadID:
44347
Views:
6901
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
20
This Thread has been Archived
Johnny boy
Hi all just settling an argument between a few mates , what's a good all rounder for touring Towing 15-1600 KG vans , and 4WD ing all 4cyl turbo diesels all about 2-4 yrs old ,I will add stuff when you guys all throw spanners in the works as I know I probably am being a bit vaig but I think you all might get the gist??
Regards J.B.
Reply By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 22:02
Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 22:02
If he's thinking of dirt bikes then the hilux would be a better option, can tow with it, throw the bikes in the back, or just going for a quit weekend can throw on the canopy chuck in the tent and fridge fold up chair, leave the wife and kids at
home and have a relaxing quit weekend LOL only kidding on the last comment. There all good vehicles. Our friends tow a coromal full size van with the 90 series diesel prado still manage 10L per 100. I believe from what Ive read on here and been told the current shape prado with the D4D motor are a bit thirstier but you are talking a couple years old so wont be in the range your talking about. I think any of them would be a great vehicle and would cost less in fuel than dragging behind his commodore We had a VX commodore V6 and was great on the open road not towing 8.4L per 100, whack the ski boat on the back (approx 1400kg) and fuel would jump up to 13/14 per 100. The current shape prado with the 4Litre motor would be great but as said above would need the 180L tanks provided. My mate has the current shape and when we went away at
easter he used the same fuel as me but was not towing anything. I was towing the camper and still maganed 12.8L per 100 with 3.4V6 90series. Go the 4by he wont regret it but if towing 1500kg would definately be going the diesel if he can afford to. Regards Steve M
AnswerID:
233657
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 22:05
Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 22:05
Forgot to mention path finders dont come in diesel and the 3.3V6 petrol they do come in you might as
well run a landcruiser 20/22 towing. Very thirsty motor.Only what I have read but maybe some one with one on here can either confirm or say thats bullsh#t.
FollowupID:
494521
Follow Up By: RichieK - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:47
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:47
I drive a 90 series diesel-I can't get 10 l/100km out of it and I don't tow anything! I used to get better economy when I first bought it but it suddenly went downhill for no reason - currently averaging 11.6 l/100km, 50/50 freeway/easy suburban (no stop start)...
Your friend must have a very light right foot to achieve 10 l/100 while towing a full size van...
Cheers and beers
Rich
FollowupID:
494594
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 14:03
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 14:03
Hi there Richie, I was talking to him last night just to confirm what I said, he did say that some times its 11 per 100 and has even nudged 12 but he said he thinks it depends on where he fills up at. Dont know why that would make a difference but he says it does. He said around town is pretty
well consistantly 9/10 per 100. Yeah he is pretty light with the right foot. But he does the speed limits doesnt sit back, When he tows the van but he says he only does 90/100 nothing more. Regards Steve M
FollowupID:
494649
Follow Up By: RichieK - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 15:42
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 15:42
Thats amazing fuel economy compared to what I get..around town I get 13-14 l/100km...
FollowupID:
494664
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 18:58
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 18:58
Hi there Richie, just filled myn up after a week of running around town and was 16L per 100 which is about the same as last time. Thats why when I bought this one I couldnt justify the extra 10g it would have cost me (and borrow some money which I hate doing) to buy the same thing in diesel. If I was towing a full size van then that might be a different story. Regards Steve M
FollowupID:
494728
Follow Up By: Member - extfilm (NSW) - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 21:31
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 21:31
Mate's got an 03 petrol Pathy and we were discussing yesterday about fuel econ. With a full car (wife and 2
young kids) and a full box trailer. he gets 450kms per tank. I can only guess the tank is approx 70l, which I think is around 16l per 100
FollowupID:
494779
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 22:00
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 22:00
Hi there extfilm, thats not as bad as Ive been informed then. Thats a fair load he should be resonably happy with that. Hey I love your main
pic. Bet you had some digging to do to get her out of that ?? Regards Steve M
FollowupID:
494791
Follow Up By: Member - extfilm (NSW) - Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 22:51
Monday, Apr 16, 2007 at 22:51
Hey Stepen M,
I stopped before the wheels dug in. I'm used to the Nav letting me down. Tyres were at 12psi and I just reversed out.
FollowupID:
494814