Friday, May 11, 2007 at 16:57
V64Runner, your facts are not correct.
Heritage listing DOES NOT overrule the provisions of the Native Title Act. Also it was mentioned in another CSR post that the CSR is a Public Access Way. It is NOT.
The CSR has always been Unallocated Crown Land (UCL) and it still is. Depending on its previous tenure UCL is subject to the Native Title Act and in this instance the CSR was claimable and included in the Martu claim.
The only reason you or others are now still able to freely travel the CSR is because the Supreme Court Judge excluded it from their claim in his determination.
Hence, it is correct to say if you travel the CSR WITHIN its proper boundaries you do not require any permits etc but this has nothing to do with
Heritage issues but because of the Judge's determination. However, I understand the problem is there are small sections of the actual 2 wheel track you would follow that are not within these boundaries and they can traverse Martu lands and others, hence it would be difficult to stay within the actual CSR boundaries for most travellers etc.
It would also seem ludicrous for anyone to do this trip without expecting or wanting to visit others areas of interest outside the CSR borders, consequently to undertake this trip without obtaining the necessary permit would be bordering on insanity.
Also TRACKCARE never has had any official status for management of the CSR, however their continued defacto support is appreciated.
FollowupID:
500324