LC 100 V8 Fuel Consumption - Towing

Submitted: Monday, May 14, 2007 at 23:02
ThreadID: 45486 Views:3329 Replies:6 FollowUps:14
This Thread has been Archived
For interest to the forum

Just finished a stress free 5,200 km trip Perth to Derby and back with 2006 V8 Auto LC100 towing 2.8 tonne ATM Supreme Territory 22' 6" full height Dirt road van. About 600kg's load in the LC also. No roof rack

Average fuel consumption over 5,200km - 21.5 litres/100 Km. Best 20.5ltrs/100km (tail wind), worst 23.5 litres/100km (15kt head wind).

Cruise control engaged at all times at 83km/hour with transmission in 4th gear and torque converter locked virtually all times with both feet flat on the floor.

Annoying slight transmission noise/resonance between 84-87km/hour precluded cruising at these speeds in 4th gear. Had no problem accelerating to 100km/hr plus for overtaking, although didn't want to contemplate fuel consumption while doing this could almost see the fuel gauge move during an overtaking

Cruise control was unusable in 5th gear due to constant gear changing and touque converter lockup suffering nervous stress at the sight of a cattle grid or a floodway.

Could count on averaging 80km/hr hour after hour, and eta's almost to the minute

Spoke with 18 month nomad at Point Sampson towing same van behind LC Troopie normally aspirated diesel and at same speed achieving 19.5 litres/100km. Stated he could get much above 95 km/hr with his rig, and that was with foot to the floor.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Topend - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:34

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 09:34
That's better than what I would have expected. I have the same vehicle and tow a 3000kg boat between home and the ramp. I usually leave it in 4th too and set the cruise at 90km/h to 100km/h depending on the amount of traffic (don't want to hold peak hour up).

I have never measured the fuel consumption but the fuel gauge does move toward empty quite quickly. I have never notice a transmission noise/resonance with mine. Maybe I'm going too quick for it to occur.

Of note if I am sitting on 100km/h with the cruise set it will hold 5th on level roads.

As a comparison I had a manual TD LC100 with a Dtronic before this vehicle. It towed the same boat up any hill Darwin has in 5th gear from 70km/h plus. Much better vehicle for towing. Again I didn't measure fuel consumption with the boat on but it was noticably better. The auto in the V8 is much better up the ramp and starting off at the lights. Got a lot of clutch shudder in the TD LC100.

Topend.
AnswerID: 240091

Reply By: DIO - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:44

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 12:44
My comments re your 'crusing/travelling' speeds will probably upset someone, however it is important that you understand your obligations whilst travelling on the road/highways as it's apparent to me that you are unclear.

If the speed limit is 80km/ph then to travel at 80km/ph is fine and perfectly legal.

If the speed limit is greater than (80 - 100 km/ph) then you have an obligation and a duty of care to drive with consideration for other road users and it could be argued, that to do so, requires that you travel at the posted speed limit. e.g. 100km/ph in a 100km/ph zone

By travelling at say 20% below the speed limit that is approved for any section of road, you literally become a mobile road block or hazard to to other road users travelling in the same direction as you.

Such action by you is likely to cause danger to other road users (rounding a bend or curve) to be confronted by you and your rig toddling along oblivious to all and sundry.

How about a vehicle approaching from behind, topping a crest only to find you and your rig suddenly appearing before them.

What about a situation on the highway, single lane each way, speed limit 100km/ph, slightly undulating and curving road, no overtaking lanes but opportunity for a vehicles to overtake safetly and legally. Many motorists will after having endured your mobile road block for some time, be tempted to overtake you and your rig simply to get away from you and not have to continue suffering the despair and indignity of conforming to your ridiculously imposed/enforced 80 km/ph. Do you think your behaviour and presence under such circumstances might be contributing to other road users taking chances/risks, or making inappropriate decisions/choices, etc? I do.

All motorists have an obligaton to drive with Due Car and Consideration at ALL times. What does that mean?

Roads, Road Traffic Laws (and Regulations) including Speed Limits are decided upon by authorities based on many factors such as terrain, gradient, road width/surface condition etc all with the desired intention of allowing an orderley and safe flow of traffic.

Safe means everyone complies with and conforms to the stated and required Road Laws as aplicable.

Orderly, everyone keeps left, uses their indicators to INDICATE their INTENTION to change lanes, doesn't lane 'hop/jump', doesn't tail-gate, doesn't 'chop-in' after overtaking, etc

I repeat, with you travelling at a reduced speed in a higher designated area it indicates a lack of desire and intention to consider the presence and safety of other road users. You are obviously not aware of the implications of your actions.

YES, there a occasions when SOME vehciels are REQUIRED to travel below the designated speed limit. In these situations and to comply with safety requirements they will often have flashing amber lights activated, appropriate signs to indicate a SLOW TRAVELLING VEHICLE, an escort (Wide Load situations) etc all with the express purpose of warning approaching vehicles that there is a hazard ahead. A or for that matter any vehicle approaching a hill will generally be slowed to some degree, however most vehicles, suitability matched to the task, will be capable of accelerating and maintaining an adequate forward speed so as to not impede most other similar vehicles.

It's all well and good that you travel at 'x' speed because (a) that's all your vehicle is capable of, or (b) your vehicle is overloaded/under-powered (c) you lack confidence and ability to safetly drive your vehicle at a speed sufficient to elliminate the potential for introducing/creating hazard(s) to other motorists (d) you consider that it is the most economical speed for you to travel at (e) you really don't care about other motorists at all so long as you can do your thing - because you want to or you can (f) someone might have told you or you might have read that in doing so it's OK because your on holidays (g) you consider it is not safe for you and your rig/combination to travel any faster because the rig sways at speed, the brakes on your vehicle might be defficient, the tyres wear out faster, you get too many bugs splattered across your windscreen, you can't hear your radio when driving faster that 'x' speed etc etc

I suggest that you (and anyone else in a similar situation) give long and deep thought to your particular situation in regard to your obvious lack of concern and consideration for the safety, well being, efficient and smooth flow of traffic.

Seriously if you or your behaviour is consistent with any of the above examples you should consider your driving future.

Most, if not all collisions (NOTE I'm not referring to them as 'accidents') occurring on the road are the result of someone NOT conforming to, complying with, adhering to or even considering the road laws let alone the presence of other road users. In general a LACK OF CONSIDERATION or an absence of DUE CARE.

To conform is not unacceptable in society. It is what makes our communities places that we want to live in, raise our family and generally enjoy or short lived lives.
AnswerID: 240118

Follow Up By: turbopete - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:11

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:11
Gloriosky,,ah tink ah will copy that post and take it to the little house out the back and read it,,Maaa git me ma spectacles ,ise gotta lotta readin to do
0
FollowupID: 501117

Follow Up By: Jenksy - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:40

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:40
Are you for real
0
FollowupID: 501122

Follow Up By: Go-N-Grey (WA) - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:47

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 16:47
I cannot leave your response unanswered. I guess many others in this forum will support my response.

Quote
"My comments re your 'crusing/travelling' speeds will probably upset someone, however it is important that you understand your obligations whilst travelling on the road/highways as it's apparent to me that you are unclear."
"Unquote"

I am very clear about my obligations when travelling on the road and highways, having driven several million kilometres without accident for 37 years, and only 3 speeding (note speeding) fines. This is in all classes of vehicle from 1200cc motorbikes, semi trailers, and over 100,000 km towing caravans and boats all over Australia. I might also add that as an airline pilot for 15 years and flew many millions of miles without incident.

Without responding to every outrageous statement you have made in your reply, suffice to say you also have a duty of care to passengers in your vehicle, pedestrians, kangaroos, wild goats, sheep, cattle, crows, and eagles who are also road users each in their own way, and they all have obligations to you as a driver, like getting out of your way, or causing damage or loss of control. To imply that all MUST travel at the speed limit your vehicle is capable of travelling at the speed limit is tantamount to reckless driving.

When driving with the van I have a reaward facing video camera that give full view or anything approaching from behind, upon seeing such I always move over and let the approaching vehicle pass at first oportunity, including probably over a hundred triple trailer road trains on the trip above. Many toot a thank you in aknowlegement.

At no time did any more than 2 vehicles follow me for any length of time (2-3 km) during the trip (or any other trip I have done including reurning to Perth on long weekends when the roads are very busy), and I certainly do not enforce a speed limit on any other road user. A few did on me, however as my rig has significant margins of power, brakes, and stability I at times accelerated to 110km to pass slower vehicles with ease.

For years I traverlled Australia with a Turbo Pajero Diesel towing a 17' Poptop. It would not go any faster than 100km flat out with the van and struggled towing anything over 85, and much less with a head wind.

What you are advocating is that many thousand of road users and rigs are removed from the roads because they are incapable of cruising at the speed limit.

Consideration is the name of the game.

Get real! slow down a bit and enjoy life, you impatience will kill you far quicker than any danger I or many other of us slower moving road users will create for you.

0
FollowupID: 501123

Follow Up By: TroopyTracker - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 19:16

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 19:16
DIO,

It's called the speed LIMIT for good reason. Perhaps you have never towed more than a 6x4 to the tip? Perhaps you are talking about on a perfectly smooth highway with decent size lanes?- In this case I'd say perhaps you really should be able to keep it around 90.

On good roads I tow at 100kmph, on outback roads I'm sometimes down to 70kmph for many kilometres and in those conditions I would not want to travel any faster.

To suggest you NEED to travel at the limit towing 3000kgs of caravan is BAD advice.

Matt
0
FollowupID: 501155

Follow Up By: Pavo - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 19:37

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 19:37
I actually prefer to come up behind someone towing that is doing 80km/h rather than 95-100km/h. The reason is because it is considerably easier (and much safer) to pass someone doing 80km/h than it is to pass someone doing 95-100km/h. I'm talking about single laned roads obviously.

Pete
0
FollowupID: 501158

Follow Up By: DIO - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:15

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:15
Yeah, OK you lot, you've had your say. You are entitled to your uninformed and naive opinions. I make no apologies for my position. My point wasn't so much in regard to the speed a vehice is travelling at, it is however a relevant factor, but more so in the poor and often lacking attitude of many drivers relative to their behaviour and attitude on the roads. Safe driving is all about Care and Consideration to all other road users (yeah kangaroos, cattle, sheep, dogs, cats, birds, reptiles, road workers etc included as well). If you have an attitude against exercising Care and Consideration to others whilst you are travelling on the roads, well all I can say is you've got a problem. Don't care how many million or zillion kms you have driven, to me it doesn't mean that you are a good driver. You might be experienced but for all I know you could still have heaps of bad habits. Ask most drivers who's been involved in a collision, most will say it was the other driver's fault. Many drivers are simply not up to speed with their driving skills, road craft, road/traffic laws, etc. Anyone who fails to support safe driving practice is in denial re their own abilities (or lack of them). Until the majority of motorists wake up to themsleves and get serious about their attitude to driving, we will continue to have deaths and unecessary suffering from injuries to our friends, familes and others. Making excuses for bad or deficient driving practices is a sign of character weakness. A motor vehicle driven on a road is not a toy or play thing. It is not meant to be an item for entertainment. (Except on a closed and controlled track or environment) Vehicles used irresponsibly can result in tragedy. Stick to your train sets, model cars, dolls, windup trains etc if you want entertainment.
0
FollowupID: 501163

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:32

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:32
Dio, you have got to be kidding havnt you. As Pete has stated I would prefer to come up to a vehicle doing 80 in a 100 zone and know as Pete has stated that I can pass him when required with out going over the speed limit. And yes I have driven trucks (semi's), bikes, 4bys, and numerous other vehicles which I am licensed for all and especially in a semi would rather him doing 80. With all my experience driving there is no way I would be towing any faster then 80/90klms even on open road with a weight like that behind me when driving a 4by or your average falcon. So are you one of these blokes that will do 50klms in a residential area going up a dead end street with kids lined up playing on the gutter sides of the road but will continue to do 50 cause it says you can !! try it in my street and you will know about it big time. I have come across many drivers doing less then the posted speed limit towing and sit back weight for a break then overtake when safe to do so. If at some stage I noticed a big que behind me I would at an available chance pull to the side let them go and continue on my way not that I did or do that often because if its people like you coming up behind me and sit right on my ar#e then I will just stay put and you overtake when you can. Whats the rush thats what a holiday is, enjoying the cenery around and not end up a road holiday statistic cause you want to get there 15 mins before me. I tow my camper at 100 even 110 but I only have 700/800 kg behind me with little wind resistance and now a vehicle capable of sitting on that speed even up hills but that is my choice and is on the freeways and open roads but I also leave a big gap between me and the vehicle in front but then I get clowns who will overtake me then dive in front of the gap I had left even at a higher speed of 110 and at a signposted speed of 110. Glad I dont travel in the car with you or any of my family. Life is short enough with out it been shortned by having an accident by some one as impatient as yourself. Mate take it easy and slow down or if getting frustated behind a slower vehicle wait and pass when you can it doesnt slow you down that much. Relax !!! Relax !!! Relax !!! Havnt got high blood pressure have you. Regards Steve M
0
FollowupID: 501167

Follow Up By: Steve from Top End Explorer Tours - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:47

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:47
I have read some crap on this forum, but that drivel you posted above is the best so far.

Point 1 learner drivers and drivers on their p plates 80 kph max any road or highway.

Point 2 Towing a trailer in some states, requires you to do 10kph less than the speed limit.

Point 3 Coaches and road trains are speed limited to 100 kph.

Point 4 Just because it is legal in the NT on all but 1 highway to do 130 kph, Would you tow a van, trailer, boat, etc at 130kph I think not.

Speed limits are a maximum recommended limit, If you can't drive to to avoid the scenarios that you put forward as hazardous, then it is you that needs to revise your driving habits.

Steve.
0
FollowupID: 501173

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:52

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 20:52
Well said Steve. Regards Steve M
0
FollowupID: 501174

Follow Up By: Member - Duke (TAS) - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 22:24

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 22:24
What rock did this wanker crawl from under.
Duke
0
FollowupID: 501209

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 22:31

Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 22:31
Hi there Duke, mate that is one mother of a crab you have in your rig profile, bet there was some serious meat on him. Regards Steve M
0
FollowupID: 501214

Follow Up By: Racey - Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 21:01

Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 21:01
Does DIO stand for Dick Head in Overdrive?
Clearly you have no concept of safe towing is all about. Sure people who tow are conscious of the traffic which may be ahead and behind and that is why we tow at what is concidered safe speeds under the circumstances which prevail.
0
FollowupID: 501381

Reply By: kiwicol - Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 10:10

Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 10:10
I partly agree with what DIO has to say, i live in far noerth QLD on the tablelands in the dry season we have many tourists visit our region in many forms of transport, it has been my experience in driving my 4by and being a semi driver that many tourists cause many problems by not driving close enough to what the speed limit is, with the conditions of the roads up here narrow with very few passing lanes i have seen many vehicles lined up behind caravans and campers having total disregard to fellow travellors behind, and having a semi behind accelerating when a overtaking lane approaches leaving the truck and then slowing down at the top, it is my opionion that all vehicles towing a caravan be fitted by law with a uhf radio tuned to ch 40. DIO,s argument falls down when the roads are long straight with many areas for overtaking as in WA. We have also had many accidents with road trains and caravans on a single lane piece of bitumen where the caravan will not get of the road and allow the R/T to pass safely the result being vans with the sde ripped off and road trains on their side in the table drain. Col
AnswerID: 240280

Reply By: Sea-Dog - Friday, May 18, 2007 at 12:17

Friday, May 18, 2007 at 12:17
Personally i have absolutely no problem with a van being towed at 80kph.... I consider that to be a reasonable speed... albeit when I am doing 110kph I would prefer to keep that speed up but you get that!!!!

What I REALLY DON'T LIKE is when that same van or truck or clapped out piece of junk in front of me doing 80 then gets to an overtaking lane and speeds up to 110kph!!!!! then as soon as the lane closes again drops back to 80..

My cruiser is by no means a rocket and has bugger all acceleration when loaded up so when i get to an overtaking lane it is little more than consideration to let the cars that are waiting patiently behind you to pass when it is safe..
AnswerID: 240740

Follow Up By: Go-N-Grey (WA) - Friday, May 25, 2007 at 22:52

Friday, May 25, 2007 at 22:52
Agree totally, it seems to happen all the time, particularly of you are last in the queue to pass.
0
FollowupID: 503403

Reply By: Mark R - Saturday, May 19, 2007 at 07:00

Saturday, May 19, 2007 at 07:00
Hey DIO, mate.....maaaaaaaaate. Agree with and relate to much of what you say in terms of general courtesy and consideration on the road but I feel you have gone way OTT in attacking a certain group of motorists who have as much right to use the road as you.

One of the important skills of a good driver is to "drive to the conditions". These "conditions" must include not only the obvious road conditions, weather conditions etc but must also encompass the driver, vehicle and whatever is being towed. This is all a bit controversial as each person's interpretation will differ. I wonder do you object to a semi using low gear going down a steep incline thereby obviously travelling below the speed limit but nevertheless dramatically increasing his safety margin? Should a learner driver be forced to travel at the speed limit? Please understand that towing a heavy rig means much compromise to maintain a constant safety margin.

Having said this, I agree that lack of common courtesy is a major problem on our roads and having an appreciation of the wants and needs of those around us on the roads is very important for road safety and unfortunately we all regularly see discourteous behaviour. I am regularly saddened by the lack of communication between drivers. A toot, flash of the lights or a wave to acknowledge courtesy on our roads is unfortunately uncommon apart from among commercial drivers.

I also find your attitude somewhat contradictory. You expect full courtesy and understanding from others for your needs but seem unwilling to be similarly understanding of the plight and needs of your fellow road users. I am also very bothered by the fact that you seem to find a closing speed of, say, 30kph (your example of coming over the crest of a hill at, say, 110kph, to find a vehicle in front of you doing 80kph) to present a danger for you. If your skills, reflexes, powers of observation, condition of vehicle etc are so poor that you find this situation threatening then as far as your driving is concerned, I think it should be "back to the drawing board".

In saying this I am not having a go at your skill level as I don't know you, but your post suggests a rather selfish attitude which inevitably is going to constantly reduce YOUR safety margin.

Happy driving mate.
AnswerID: 240937

Reply By: Member - Bill I (NSW) - Saturday, May 19, 2007 at 12:23

Saturday, May 19, 2007 at 12:23
Thanks for that. Got the v8 myself and am doing the big trip in 08. Did you put in a second big tank? Any worries between fuel stops? How did it go off-road with the van?
Cheers
Bill
AnswerID: 240984

Follow Up By: Go-N-Grey (WA) - Friday, May 25, 2007 at 23:33

Friday, May 25, 2007 at 23:33
No second big tank, a couple of jerries do the job. In WA no more than 650km between major towns with cheaper fuel, and the standard tanks make that, although I would be cautious as head winds can dramatically reduce range. Thats why I had jerries for reserve fuel, never used them though. They were used for the gennie.

Despite the 2.8 tonne weight the LC handled the van effortlessly. With the 5 speed auto getting underway simply meant engaging D and taking foot off brake. No clutch shudder etc and with a gentle foot gear changes at around 2000RPM detectable only on the tacho.

I dont do the macho 4wd thing any more with that sort of weight and investment out the back ( My wife and I want a holiday - not a nightmare - if you want to do that get an off road camper trailer), but I do like to have the confidence and clearance to get well off the road away from noise and other people when bush camping -besides my wife wanting to take the kitchen sink in a well built and heavy duty van.

The van suspension, chassis and tyres are rated at 3,500kgs, however the placarded ATM is 2790kgs, so lots of strength in reserve meaning longer life. (And plenty of scope to cope with overloading......and more kitchen sinks)

By far and away the biggest and heaviest rig I have ever owned (6.2 tonne fully fuelled and watered), but also the most capable and comfortable and large reserves of power and strength leading to stress free touring.

Just watch how fast you travel, the cruiser will willingly cruise with van at 100+ km/hr, but Oh boy, will you pay at the pump if you do. (30ltrs+/100km)

We are doing 6 months on the road in 2008 in NT & FNQ
0
FollowupID: 503417

Sponsored Links