disturbed about mitchell plateau mine
Submitted: Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 06:50
ThreadID:
45933
Views:
2874
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
samsgoneagain
just read some news on new
mine near
mitchell plateau. i am not usually against mining ,but cant they leave somthings as it is, especially that area.
after seeing what the refinery has done to the waters around gove, i am not too keen on this project. it will be the last frontier penetrated by commerce and pollution.
Reply By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 08:52
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 08:52
Thanks for raising this Sam. This is a super-critical issue and there is a lot of activity going on at present between the WA Government and industry.
At the same time as taking a hands-off policy to the protection of
heritage and environment in the area, the WA Government is positively planning industrial development and new mining on the
Mitchell Plateau.
There is a big Bauxite project and others, that will get legs based on the apparent approvals of the off-shore gas facilities and planned pipelines that the indigenous owners appear set to give the go-ahead to.
You should:
1. visit the area and see the amazing unprotected environment we are talking about
2. talk with locals with some understanding of the issue like John Haywood, the
park ranger for
Mitchell Falls NP
3. start making a big fuss with WA politicians
4. telling your friends.
I am aware of only one group "CHEAK" - www.savethekimberley.com that are active on this issue. If anyone is aware of any others I would love to hear.
Time to take a trip to
Walsh Point or Port Warrender and see what pristine country is being planned to be done over, not to speak of the areas on the plateau where the mines are planned.
Cheers
Andrew.
AnswerID:
242642
Reply By: lindsay - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 08:52
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 08:52
There was a
mine there before, that is why the
airstrip is there.
AnswerID:
242643
Follow Up By: samsgoneagain - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 09:39
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 09:39
yes i worked at truscott for a while. i flew over the area many times
FollowupID:
503641
Follow Up By: samsgoneagain - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 09:52
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 09:52
santos was there a few years ago. they left mining crap every where. i am no green but i belive in cleaning up a bit
FollowupID:
503644
Reply By: joc45 - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 10:38
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 10:38
There was an exploration
camp there in the 70's, with a small crusher, most of which has gone now, and in more recent times the scrapes have been restored, the only remaining
infrastructure being the large
airstrip and the roads in there. I was under the impression that mining was not proceeding.
It would be a tragedy if the
mine went ahead.
I cannot see how the plateau area, with its unique stands of Livistona palms would remain intact with mining there. The priceless rainforest remnants would be obliterated as
well. The port facilities would most likely ruin the historic middens at Pt Walsh, apart from being a total eyesore.
Very sad...
Gerry
AnswerID:
242666
Reply By: turbopete - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 14:43
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 14:43
Hi samsgoneagain can u elaborate on the "
water around Gove" statement
AnswerID:
242692
Reply By: SD - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 15:12
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 15:12
About the only thing the refinery at (Gove)
Nhulunbuy has done is give the traditional owners millions and millions of dollars in royaltys and support to a community. Ask Gallawuy Yunipingu if he wants the refinery closed? I think not. I'm not a scientist by I've noticed no difference in the bay or waters around
Nhulunbuy and I live here. Obviously a person would be niave to believe a 30 year old refinery and
mine has zero impact on the environment.
AnswerID:
242695
Follow Up By: samsgoneagain - Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 17:36
Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 17:36
yeah whats that green slimey crud on all the rocks around the beaches. and see the dust when they are unloading hydrate at
the wharf .!!
FollowupID:
503709