Monday, May 05, 2003 at 09:49
Hi David,
Just a comment about your 5th point above. I've noted that at my local servo, 98 unleaded is always a flat 9c/litre dearer than normal unleaded. I've been keeping track of all my 'roos fuel consumption since April last year and noticed that when using 98, I do actually get 7% better fuel economy, roughly 1.7L/100km improvement. I don't get this improvement with 95 premium though.
What I didn't consider is that when the price of 98 is down, it is actually not worth buying it. For example yesterday I filled up with normal unleaded at 81.7c/L. The 98 was 90.7c/L. 98 is 11% dearer. Clearly that doesn't compare to a 7% consumption improvement.
However, as the price of ULP goes up as it did in the last couple of months to say 99.7c/L (or more), 98 was still 9c/L dearer at 108.7c/L. 98 is now only 9% dearer. Still doesn't match a 7% consumption improvement but it illustrates the point I'm making.
Assuming the difference between ULP and 98 stays at a constant 9c/L (or 5c/L, 7c/L, whatever), then it is actually more worthwhile to fill up with the higher octane fuel as the price gets dearer. Something to think about!
Nonetheless, I generally use normal ULP around town. But will always use either a 98 or Premium when on any sort of extended trip. The extra responsiveness is noticeable and makes the trip more pleasant for me as the driver. I start using the 98 two tankfuls ahead of the trip so by the time the trip rolls around, the octane rating is not diluted.
Cheers...Savvas
FollowupID:
12036