Headlight Lamp Upgrade , Value for Money.

Submitted: Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:33
ThreadID: 46250 Views:3909 Replies:10 FollowUps:15
This Thread has been Archived
Hows it going ,

I want to upgrade my headlight bulbs mostly for a better high beam , although I would be prepared to put up with better low beam if required. : )

The problem I have is that bulbs ranging in price from a few dollars ( eBay ) to $150 ( ARB ) all claim to do the same thing.

I know you get what you pay for, but are the IPF ones that much better than say Phillips ones from the local auto store.

Glenn.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Kev M (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:07

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:07
Glenn,

I have the complete IPF headlight upgrade and when compared to the OE headlights they are fantastic.
I have the 170/100 H4 Bulbs and I am rarely flashed on low beam. I haven't tried the cheaper bulbs as yet but when the current ones die I'll be definately giving them a go. In 7 years I have only had to replace the bulbs once and that was about 4 years ago. So hopefully they will last a while longer.

Cheers Kev
Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 244564

Reply By: Twinkles - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:19

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:19
I replaced the globes in my Hilux with 90/80 (I think) cheap globes. Huge difference. I was told not to go any higher, although the store thought my car would have a relay(?). I have IPF driving lights too. I wanted a better low beam.
AnswerID: 244569

Reply By: Member - Gavin B (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:13

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:13
I've upgraded the OEM's in my Jackaroo to the IPF Fatboy's and I would say it is some of the better money I've spent in recent times.

The change is quite amazing (OEM's were woeful bear in mind). What I liked about them that tipped me to buy them over others was that they aren't much bigger wattage over the standards, but they use a different gas which creates the better output - meaning no need for a loom upgrade.

They have the equivalent of 190w low beam output but are only 10w or so larger wattage than the standards (55w).

I haven't tried any other globe replacements, but I can't see you could get much better light coverage/intensity than these provide IMHO.

$150 for two bulbs though....
AnswerID: 244577

Follow Up By: Member - Gavin B (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:14

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:14
I might add that the 190w was for low beam, the high beam is the equivalent of 150w from memory, not as marked an increase as the low beam but still significanly larger than the OEM high beam (60w).
0
FollowupID: 505568

Reply By: DIO - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:31

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:31
Whilst I am not making any judgements on what you do or don't do, there's a couple of things that you might need to be aware of:

Fitting higher wattage bulbs is likely to damage (burn) the reflectors in your lights - over time.

Check with your relevant Road Traffic Act and ADR to clarify the legality of substituting light bulbs in headlamps. Is there a limit to the allowable wattage?

The fitting of higher wattage globes to produce more light may also constitute an offence. e.g.
'A light, except a high-beam headlight, fitted to a vehicle must be built and adjusted to provide the necessary amount of light, without dazzling the driver of another vehicle approaching, or being approached by, the vehicle.'

Over recent years, for reasons that are completely foreign and unknown to me, some motorists have taken to driving at night with headlights and fog lights illumanted at the same. The results being that oncoming motorists and those being followd by such vehicles are subjected to excessive headlight glare. We've all experienced it and proabably wondered why it was necessary for motorists of modern vehicles, usually equipped with halogen (or other high intensity lights) to feel the need to drive around with the fog lights also on. If their headlights were considered inadequate, then 'rip' the vehicle back to the manufacturers and demand that it comply with ADRs etc. I would. Seems to me that it some kind of 'image' or 'pose' thing. I don't know or understand it - probably because I grew out of that childish behaviour years ago. They probably will too - one day.
AnswerID: 244600

Follow Up By: Member - Mike DID - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:26

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:26
In NSW it is illegal to drive with foglights except during poor visibility.
0
FollowupID: 505610

Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:22

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:22
Same with Qld. Illegal to use except in fog or rain.
I think there is a rule that the fog lights should be on and low beam off.
And I would argue some of those 'fog' lights are more driving lights.
ADR compliance question there which car dealers can't seem to confirm when asked.
Don't have the cut off beam of a fog light, or aimed that low either.
Might have to mount my super oscars down low and give the wankers a flash. :o)
Havn't done it yet because I would have to move them again before hitting the dirt.
0
FollowupID: 505693

Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:26

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:26
Sorry Glenn, that last one was a bit OT.
I have put in 100/90 QH bulbs to replace the 60/55.
Seem to improve the system with out causing anybody any glare hassle, and doesn't overload the standard wiring or relays.
Did try 130/100 QH, but no appreciable gain, the wiring might be a bit light for doubling the output with too much voltage drop.
0
FollowupID: 505694

Follow Up By: Member - John D (VIC) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:38

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:38
You're right DIO, they are a pose etc, the people driving such vehicles with the fog lights on are regarded as "LAM's" (Look At Me).

Cheers,
John D
0
FollowupID: 505696

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:35

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:35
You're all sooks, I have the fog lights on my XR6 and use them all the time, they give excellent close in light and reeally fill out the beam pattern. I have found that the Ford lights are better controlled than the Commodore ones, the Commodore ones flare all over the place, the Falc ones done flare and dazzle at all.
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 505852

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 00:03

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 00:03
Hmmmm,

Are we perhaps getting confused with the terminology of "fog lights" guys.
(Or is it just me)

Some vehicle manufacturers (Holden and Ford included) have followed the European practice of having another set of lights down low, under the bumper level and directed at an angle outwards to illuminate the side of the road better.

To my understanding "fog lights" can be anything from spot/flood/driving lights to low mounted lights directed forward but yellow in colour.
These yellow fog lights I think are the ones not allowed on in "normal" driving conditions.

Personally, I find any vehicle with more than one set of headlights on, distracting when they are appraching you head on. When these "additional" lights are added to the "dork" mobile, they can be worse, as far as glare is concerned, especially when they are brighter than the standard headlights above.

Now my '99 model Jackaroo is not known for the brightest lights around.
I probably took one step and upgraded the headlight globes (H4) to Narva "Arctic Blue" which in fact give out a brilliant white light, not blue tinged. These globes are ADR approved and "street legal". The next step would have been Phillips "Blue Vision" but these were twice the price and I don't think, twice as good.

The Narva globes do not change the wattage or heat output at all and therefore will not have an adverse impact on the reflectors.

I find the illumination is definitely whiter than the standard globes and is quite sufficient for normal night driving.
If I need more illumination I have the IPF's to light up the road ahead, but I'm usually "in camp" and sitting around a fire with a glass of red by the time it gets dark.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 505874

Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:48

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:48
Hey Bonz, I know you are proud of your XR6, and it is a good car, but are the low beam lights that bad that you need to run extra lights? :o)))
Agree with you about the commodores lower lights. They do shine all over the place, and I often give them a flash of my high beam. When I am down lower in the Golf, it is a real pain in the eyes.
Find WRXs are the same, when they run around town with low beam and their lower lights on. Given up trying to stay ahead of the WRXs, just let them past. The old 78 Golf GTi is a second or two slower over the 1/4 mile than a WRX which makes it hard, but it gives them a good run for thier money.

Sandman, the lower lights must be considered 'fog' lights by the car manufacturer since they can be seperately switched to the high beam. If they are any type of driving light, they should be set up so they can only come on with high beam.
0
FollowupID: 505900

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 17:08

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 17:08
Oldplodder,

Mate, my wife's car has these extra lights on it, but they are controlled by the main headlight switch. (i.e. they are only on when the headlights are on)
They can be then be "manoeuvred" to provide limited control of direction.

There is no way I could call these lights "fog lights".
Factory fitted yes, but still bullsh*t IMO. Probably included because the smaller diameter headlights on her sports convertable do not provide adequate sideways illumination..

Now, in years to come, there would be little to stop some future owner from putting higher powered "blue" globes in because it "looks cool". (I don't think they are sealed beam)

Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 506002

Reply By: me2@neuralfibre.com - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:36

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:36
neuralfibre.com/paul/?p=80
neuralfibre.com/paul/?p=73

Paul
AnswerID: 244642

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:38

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:38
Cant see much difference Paul
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 505855

Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:40

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:40
Ive gone down this track.....

www.xenonoz.com.au

At $1,600- a pair, they're not gunna suit everybody of course......but they are bloody great lights!!!!!
AnswerID: 244644

Follow Up By: Member - Bucky (VIC) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:22

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:22
I can vouch for that, Roachie flashed me in his drive-way,,,,
That didn't come out that good ,,, did it ,,( hehehehe )

But Roachie thats too much $$$$$$$$$,,,, wonder how those " el-cheepo " ones from Ebay stack up
Cheers Mate
Bucky
0
FollowupID: 505887

Follow Up By: me2@neuralfibre.com - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:59

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:59
Mine were only $230, and down to $150pr now.

Paul
0
FollowupID: 505913

Follow Up By: Member - Glenn D (NSW) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:29

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:29
Might follow this one up a bit just so I can see the Missus's face when I start telling her about the $1600 light bulbs I want.

On the other hand I could just start here and will be in the goodbooks when I save $1450 and get the IPF ones.

Glenn.
0
FollowupID: 505936

Reply By: Robin Miller - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:44

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 17:44
Like a couple of others here Glenn I am using the $150 ARB fatboys although they were only $120.

While really good I do not think they are worth the $ .

Certainly its better to first reduce any wiring loses.

Robin Miller
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 244695

Reply By: Muzzgit [WA] - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 18:00

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 18:00
Glenn, I have the IPF fatboy globe upgrade and after several attempts to get better performance out of the headlights, i have found these to be great. IPF state that the main purpose of these globes is a bigger benefit to low beam than high beam, but I find them to be good.

The danger in getting high current draw globes is that not only are you risking damage to the wiring in your car which is not designed for it, but you will over time stuff up the on/off/high/low/indicator toggle on the steering wheel, and believe me, they are not cheap!
AnswerID: 244703

Follow Up By: Member - Glenn D (NSW) - Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:17

Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:17
Hows it going Muzzgit ,

All the switches do is turn relays on or off . Contacts in the relay ,rated to the power requirement of the load , do the heavy switching work. This protects the switches from the load current . A good example is comparing the thin wiring of the ignition switch to the more hefty cable of the starter motor it controls.

Have you just had all your switches replaced , maybe someone was fibbing to you.

Thanks for your reply , hope this helps you out as well.

Glenn.
0
FollowupID: 505934

Follow Up By: Muzzgit [WA] - Wednesday, Jun 06, 2007 at 00:10

Wednesday, Jun 06, 2007 at 00:10
Hi Glenn, I realise spotties run thru a relay but was not sure about the main lights.

As stated below about the philips globes, I tried them in both my cibie spotlights (H1) and the high beam of the Patrol (H4) and was not impressed with either.

I took the H1 out of the cibies almost straight away and a mate is now using them in the high beam of his 80 series and the H4 came out a bit later and also went into the high/low of his 80 series. Gee, he's done fairly well out of me then, hasn't he!

I then put in the fatboys and I don't think there is a better option other than HID. I do not have a problem with retro fitting HID to spotlights but it is illegal to do it to headlights of a GU patrol.

Cheers,

Muzz
0
FollowupID: 506126

Reply By: Macca_GU - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:09

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 22:09
G'day Glenn,

IMHO for the cost of the fatboys, the Phillips Crystal vision are almost as good, I have tried both in my GU IV.

Cheers Macca
AnswerID: 244778

Reply By: Member - Glenn D (NSW) - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 15:16

Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 15:16
Thanks for the info everyone.

Glenn.
AnswerID: 245631

Sponsored Links