piggy back camper

Submitted: Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 14:00
ThreadID: 46653 Views:7737 Replies:7 FollowUps:6
This Thread has been Archived
I am considering buyer a tray back camper some way down the track and am particularly interested in the Piggy Back. Does anyone have any experience with the Piggy Back or any tray back camper for that matter. Cheers, Paps.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: GoneTroppo Member (FNQ) - Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 14:36

Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 14:36
Paps
We had a Heaslip for a couple of years and have now changed to a Utility camper.
Nothing is ever perfect but for us the Utilty comes close.
This is their site www.utilitycampers.com/

Also have a look at thread 35872.

Cheers
AnswerID: 246779

Follow Up By: alleycat7 - Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 17:58

Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 17:58
Gone Troppo, we have a Heaslip clone, but find it's a lot of hard work to pack up (neither of us are very tall)..looked at the Utility camper, but could find no indication of price - would you be prepared to say what a ballpark figure would be, just so I know whether it's possible or just another bit of pie in the sky for me.

Cheers

Alleycat7
0
FollowupID: 507618

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 18:37

Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 18:37
That Utility Camper looks like a very neat piece of kit to me.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 507628

Follow Up By: GoneTroppo Member (FNQ) - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:33

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:33
Alleycat
The packing up with the Heaslip is what got to me as well and I'm 6'3". Plus we always seemed to get a lot of sand and dirt on the top of the bedding.

For what it's worth, I got reasonalble money for the Heaslip secondhand.

With some extras, awning etc and a couple of changes the Utility was 33K. But I think there have been a couple of price rises, call Stewart at Utility and tell him Chris from Mission Beach sent you I'm sure he'll loook after you .
Point worth making is that Stewart is very willing to make mods and changes to suit, so you finish up with a custom product to your requirements.

Cheers
Chris
0
FollowupID: 507808

Reply By: Member - Craig D (SA) - Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 14:51

Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 14:51
Hi Paps, there is a guy at my work who has one on the back of a Land Rover 130 (also runs a lazy axle for the weight). I can get his email address if you would like?

Personally, I have a Carry Me Camper on the back of a GU Cab Chassis. Have a look at my rig pics.

Cheers,
AnswerID: 246789

Follow Up By: Paps - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:44

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:44
Thanks for the replies guys. Craig D if your mate has a Piggy Back (that is the brand name) I'd be interested in emailing him if you could post the address. Cheers Paps.
0
FollowupID: 507847

Reply By: LCRUZA (VIC) - Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 15:33

Thursday, Jun 14, 2007 at 15:33
We have Trayon (www.trayon.com) and are very happy with it. First trip with was the CSR and there were no issues with it all except the others in the group who were envious particularly the fast set up time!!

Ron
AnswerID: 246798

Reply By: Paps - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:46

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:46
Thanks everyone for your replies. It's all about homework. I don't want to spend $30,000 on the wrong unit. Cheers Paps.
AnswerID: 247025

Reply By: Member - Craig D (SA) - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:15

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:15
Hi Paps, my mates name is George and his email address is:

Gwillanski at raytheon dot com dot au

There is also a new camper on the market called the Outback Tray Topper. Costs about 17k and weighs 320kg dry - made by Outback Campers in Victoria. July 2007 4WD Monthly has a write up on this unit.

One thing to consider with any Tray Camper is the carrying of the spare tyre/s if you have no undertray stowage for a spare. This is how I solved my problem as I had no provision for a spare under the tray.

!MPG:9!

Best regards.
AnswerID: 247031

Follow Up By: Member - Craig D (SA) - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:19

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:19
Here's a better pic Paps. They are cantilvered so even my dimunutive wife can get a tyre on/off the back (does wonders for my back, too).

!MPG:13!
0
FollowupID: 507856

Reply By: Member - Craig D (SA) - Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:21

Friday, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:21
Sorry Paps, but I just found out that my mate's is a Utility Camper, not a Piggy Back. Sorry for the misunderstanding on my behalf.
AnswerID: 247032

Follow Up By: Paps - Wednesday, Jun 20, 2007 at 13:10

Wednesday, Jun 20, 2007 at 13:10
Craig, Thanks for all your effort. The question of spares was another consideration. I was almost sold on an "Active Camper" as mentioned by someone else here because it has a hard roof and you can set up solar panels on top. But the bed comes out over the cabin and excludes having a roof rack of any sort. That's were I imagine putting my spares but once again, I can see myself having trouble getting them up and down in my soon to be 50's. I see you have a GU Patrol. That's the next thing to sort out. My wife wants a duel cab of some sort but I can't go past truck like dependability and a solid front axle. That only leaves two to choose from. From my research the Patrol is far more modern inside, roomier, better aerodynamics, wider wheel base and better value for money. But the Cruiser has a more modern engine, Better fuel economy, better gearing and a longer wheel base. It would appear you can expect to pay 7,000 to 10,000 more for a Cruiser so that may be the deciding point in the end. At the moment I've still got two teenage kids and a GQ wagon. It all keeps you interested. Paps.
0
FollowupID: 508902

Reply By: Member - Craig D (SA) - Wednesday, Jun 20, 2007 at 13:19

Wednesday, Jun 20, 2007 at 13:19
No problem Paps. Although the GU ST is more modern in the cabin, don't discount the Cruiser - it has a longer wheel base to start with and GVM is higher. On a recent desert trip with two tray top 79 series there wasn't much difference in fuel economy between us - between 12.5 and 13.5 L/100 - I was the 13.5. Just came back from Geelong to Melbourne, sat on 100kph, had the Carry Me Camper on the back and managed 13 l/100 so I don't thinkl the old GU 4.2 is as bad as many make out.

At the end of the day it's all about choice. I chose the GU for the reasons you stated (as it's our daily driver as well) and then we decided on a camper.

Good luck with it all and keep us posted!
AnswerID: 248070

Sponsored Links