vhf antenna
Submitted: Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 18:25
ThreadID:
47265
Views:
2200
Replies:
2
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
zumzum
Hi guys. Just enquiring about vhf antennae .... whith one is most suitable for a philips FM92 vhf radio?
Thanks!
Reply By: Tony MD - Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 18:37
Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 18:37
what frequency are you operating the FM92 on?
1/4 wave ground planes are the simplest
AnswerID:
250069
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 18:43
Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 18:43
5/8 vertical is better :)
Are you really on VHF with your FM92 (must mean you have an Amateur Licence) or do you have one which has been converted to cover UHF CB bands?
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
511190
Follow Up By: obee - Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 20:42
Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 20:42
and if you have a licence you would not be asking the question. you would know the answer already. just looking up on google, the radio is built for the 2 meter band and there are no cb frequencys there.
More info would be helpful
Owen
FollowupID:
511219
Follow Up By: Tony MD - Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 21:34
Saturday, Jun 30, 2007 at 21:34
Mike & Owen, there is, was an allocation of one frequency around 160mHz that was for 4wd use. Think that LROC may be the only ones using it? I did have an FM92 .bin file for it.
FollowupID:
511228
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47
Never heard of it Tony, got any more into? Equipment would have to be "Type Approved" I imagine? Which would make it next to impossible/very expensive to obtain?
My searches did indicate some interesting frequency allocations for VKS737 though:
Site Link
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
511253
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:44
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:44
Yes it was Lroc - they get much better range of course around the hills , we have forgotten how good VHF could be actually and how poor UHF cb really is.
Had an automatic station on 2m in city and could get data from it almost anywhere (not in valley) within 100km radius running 150w from car.
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
511254
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:23
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:23
>running 150w from car.
Is that a typo? I cannot imagine why anyone would want to use 150W on 2m mobile (I'm struggling to think why you would ever need it) and I dread to think what the power consumption would be.
My FM900 produces about 19W and I can hit the Tasmanian repeaters from about 600m altitude with that.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
511258
Follow Up By: Skippy In The GU - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:56
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:56
That could be the experimental freq you can use on 160megs, in which you'll need a license to use it.
FollowupID:
511270
Follow Up By: Tony MD - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:40
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:40
No, not an experimental frequency. I was unaware of such a frequency on VHF
See " target="EOF" class="lbg">www.lrocv.com.au/store/page.pl?id=78 fo some reference. I think that I have the frequency in memory on my FT1500? Never heard anything on it.
Anyway, an un-modified FM92 would operate fine on it, as long as the VCO board holds together.
FollowupID:
511278
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 19:25
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 19:25
150w Mike simply because that was legal max , and matched the automatic base station at home, had acceptable coverage.
Transistor's to in the output amp, which I designed - when I worked for Philips.
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
511340
Reply By: zumzum - Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 19:19
Sunday, Jul 01, 2007 at 19:19
Just enquiring about this .... I was watching on e-bay a philips radio for less than $50 ... I did not bid it but I was thinking about ....
I'm very interessed on the radio amateur word .... I would like to know more ....
Thanks!
Luca
AnswerID:
250190