VHF radio or satphone?

Submitted: Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:51
ThreadID: 47349 Views:3317 Replies:16 FollowUps:17
This Thread has been Archived
I'm keen to get some feedback from people who've had experience with both. My budget doesn't allow me to do both the transceiver and the satphone - besides which not sure if it's necessary. Functionally the unit would serve as an "in case of need only".
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: pepper2 - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:09

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:09
very few travellers have VHF do you mean HF or UHF and where do you want it to work?
AnswerID: 250453

Reply By: Hairy - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:10

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:10
Gday,
If you only want it for emergencies, I would get a sat phone....You can call someone for help direct if you need something and you dont need arials and things.
The main advantage of Hf is you can get weather reports, news and have a general chat with other travellers. If your not into chating on radios the sat phone would probably be better for you.

Cheers
AnswerID: 250454

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:35

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:35
Disagree if only for emergencys then HF is a far cheaper option. It costs you nothing to sit in the vehicle (except purchase price in my case $600) If you want to participate with VKS that is an additional 70 a year if not they are duty bound to help anyone in a genuine emergency
0
FollowupID: 511639

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:49

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:49
Dont think money was the main opjective, but practicality.
0
FollowupID: 511641

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:38

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:38
The HF solution seems to be more commonly used thereby possibly also making it more practical. The social element of easy and cheap communication with other users is a worthwhile plus. Where does one buy a reasonably priced setup that is also reliable?
0
FollowupID: 511649

Follow Up By: Member - Mike DID - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:57

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:57
If you already have a Telstra GSM Simcard with International Roaming, it costs you nothing per month to use a Motorola 9500 or 9505 Satphone.

Just insert the Simcard and start calling.
0
FollowupID: 511651

Reply By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:15

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:15
Thanks pepper2 - should have been HF of course!
AnswerID: 250455

Reply By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:17

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:17
Just to add to the info - need it to work anywhere and anytime we're out on our own and without mobile phone reception. Could be Yengo NP but also Simpson Desert.
AnswerID: 250456

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:23

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:23
Gday,
Nothing is garunteed to work everywhere all the time.
Sounds like you could do with an old lunch box (portable HF in a carry case) if you dont go the satphone. At least if your "pashabulked" down in between a range with no reception you can walk to a better place.
Cheers
0
FollowupID: 511637

Reply By: Member - robert R (SA) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:39

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:39
In my opinion both is the best way but if I had to choose one it would be HF. The only advantage of a sat phone is you can quickly remove it from your car, e.g. If your car caught on fire in a remote area, but HF is far cheaper in the long run.
cheers Rob
AnswerID: 250459

Reply By: pepper2 - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:24

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:24
i have hf but sat fone is simpler,if you go hf remember other members of your party must be trained to use the radio,if you were the only one trained and also incapacitated untrained others may not be able to call for help....they cannot pick up the mike and yell HELP
do a check on globalstar before you decide
AnswerID: 250480

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 14:13

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 14:13
Good point. Big Jo's feedback is quite concerning though - but I hope this represents a minority! I reckon Kev's suggestion makes a lot of sense.
0
FollowupID: 511659

Reply By: Member - big bo (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:54

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:54
I got a Globalstar sat phone for my last trip and it was an abslolute heap of rubbish, would not work in cold conditions, they gave me all sort of excuses and it took more than 3/4 of the trip before they got it back to me in Alice, by then the need for one was over, it has since kept switching off and when i tried to get it fixed up under warranty they wanted to charge me $55 for it, told them to stick it and since they will not have CDMA coverage after next Jan. I consider the contract null and void. I don't know about the other brands but I would never have another sat. phone and will go with other options. (smoke signals would be better than a Globalstar)
Feel better now that I have got that off my chest.
AnswerID: 250483

Follow Up By: Member - Mike DID - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 19:57

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 19:57
Globalstar and Iridium use totally different satellites.

The failing Globalstar sats have no effect on Iridium (Telstra) performance.
0
FollowupID: 511725

Reply By: Kev M (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 13:33

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 13:33
Get a HF unit and then hire the Sat phone for the peroids that you need it. That way you have the best of both worlds :)

Cheers Kev
Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 250489

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:11

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:11
I think that's the way I may end up going. Thanks for the input. Johan.
0
FollowupID: 511755

Reply By: Paps - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 14:13

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 14:13
With a sat phone, you will never know if there is someone only 5 liometres away who could help. Paps
AnswerID: 250493

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 15:07

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 15:07
We travel in groups - theres always a couple of sat phones and a couple of HF radios.

The HF radio people usually tune into the odd sked session each day to make sure theres no messages for them, and to find out whats happening around them - travellers, weather etc VKS log their location and expected destination the next day. So theres a current database of who's around you, and perhaps they could be selcalled in an emergency to help. If theres an emergency of any sort, the VKS operator generally has a few good clues about how to get help to you - they may phone around to get parts for you, or to find out the best way out of your predicament. So you have an experienced "mate" doing the running around. They will also connect you with RFDS.

You can also make telephone calls out through your HF radio by subscribing to a radio telephone network like BushPhone or Radtel. I use these, and find it very good. I usually call my wife or kids every day of two, so they have track of where we are and hows it going. But I've also used it to phone a friend, or parts dealer, or vehicle service dept to get some info.

But theres a big learning curve for knowing how to get the best out of your HF - everything from picking the right aerial, frequencies, time of day, distances etc etc etc It takes a lot of practice. And if you roll, drown or burn your vehicle, your HF will probably go with it, so an EPIRB is pretty handy for such occasions.

If you have a sat phone, you have to make the calls, unless you belong to something like RAA Assist, where your motoring organisation or insurance company is willing to do some running around on your behalf. Otherwise you'll be phoning to arrange your own recovery - you just need to have access to a list of important phone numbers - ideally every station in the area, as well as police, ambulance etc

Sat phones are great for calling friends, family or your business, and a sat phone allows them to easily call you. The fact that Globalstar are providing a substandard service at present is a nuisance but will hopefully improve. And most people can easily learn to use a satphone. And if you roll, drown or burn your vehicle, theres a fair chance you can hang onto the satphone.

Cheers
phil
AnswerID: 250505

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:14

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:14
Thanks for the input Phil - greatly appreciated. As you may see fromother follow ups I've posted - think I'm going to go the route of the HF with rental satphone when needed. Johan.
0
FollowupID: 511756

Reply By: The Landy - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 16:45

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 16:45
This question frequently comes up and as you can see there can be a variance in opinion.

The reason for this is that neither will outperform the other in certain circumstances. What you need to decide is what is the real motivation for having one. Do you want to maintain regular contact with someone (VKS737) when travelling in remote areas, or do you want it for emergency contact only.

We choose to have both, although being connected through Globalstar we share the frustration of many on this forum with the current quality of service.

The new generation HF radios are simple to use if you are willing to spend a small amount of time to learn how to use them. Joining services such as VKS737 will give you access to pertinent travel/weather information, and commercial operators like Radtel enable telephone calls through the network along with emergency support and assist services.

For my money, the HF is well suited for outback travel; whilst the issue of it becoming inoperable in the event of the vehicle being destroyed is a consideration, it assumes a presence of mind that you will take the satphone in the event of an accident. That may or may not occur. An EPIRB carried in your pocket might be more useful than either the HF/Satphone in such an instance in any case.

Work out what you need it for, that will enable you to choose the alternative more readily……..

Oddly enough, your original question on VHF Radio could be appropriate in an emergency. All transport aircraft operating in Australia monitor frequency 121.50, the same frequency that the old generation EPIRBS transmit on. In an emergency you all almost certain to be able to contact someone…although for the cost of a VHF radio you might just as well by a Satphone.

Cheers
AnswerID: 250522

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:16

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:16
Thanks for the input Landy. See my follow up note to Phil D. Johan.
0
FollowupID: 511757

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:16

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:16
I meant Phil G of course! J.
0
FollowupID: 511758

Reply By: MEMBER - Darian (SA) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 16:54

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 16:54
Yep - seems you are posing the old "long distance comms" question .....Satphone of HF (not VHF). We have a balanced article at at VKS737 on that topic - vks737.on.net (Satphone tab, far right of main site view). Re the comment above that "VKS737 is duty bound to help out anyone on channel in an emergency" is indeed true - but a broken down vehicle full of tucker, tents, water and healthy people is not an emergency ! ...... try the Police.......this is the view that they would take. That said, VKS737 volunteer operators do of course often help out people who are "severely compromised in the bush" (no emergency) but to stay on-side with the ACMA regulations, it is best if a paid up member is somewhere in the loop (ideally, the person that the base station is talking too).
AnswerID: 250526

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 18:40

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 18:40
I'll second that. As I have an Amateur Licence I don't need VKS737 services but if you don't have one then $70 per year is a very small price to pay for the excellent service VKS737 provide.

Satphone or HF - ho hum...?

Both have their place and having both would be the better option... but, at the end of the day, I'll take the HF thanks :)

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 511704

Follow Up By: ddr - Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:36

Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:36
Mike is VKS $70 or $90? all the doco on the site says $90.
0
FollowupID: 511803

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 17:44

Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 17:44
It's probably a couple of years since I checked their subscription fee ddr but I'm sure if the site says $90 then that's the price - still excellent value though.

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 511882

Reply By: kimprado - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 20:35

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 20:35
Johan

Have a look at the Codan NGT HF www.telstrat.com.au Not cheap, but they provide instruction classes which helps in understanding how a HF operates.

The others have covered it pretty well, but if you decide on a Satellite phone, look at the Motorola 9505. I've used it many times and would recommend it to anyone.

The other obvious consideration is an EPIRB.

The other thing that never seems to be discussed on this site is a survival kit.

These gadgets are all good and well, until things go pear shaped. I've been bushed a few times and don't go anywhere without a survival kit.

Regards

Kim

Kim
AnswerID: 250589

Follow Up By: Johan H (NSW) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:10

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:10
Hi Kim. You're absolutely right. The response I've had to what appears to be an age old question among 4WD'ers has been amazing. They've all covered all angles well. Still not sure what I'm going to do because as you, and several others have pointed out, both systems have their merits. May go the route of HF installation with a rented satphone as and when.
Johan
0
FollowupID: 511754

Reply By: Aandy(WA) - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 20:36

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 20:36
"In case of need only" is definitely best served by a sat phone. When you need it you can call precisely the service you need. An HF (I assume you mean HF) radio is good for a chat, free to use but you might not get the service/person you want. It is also a costly permanent fitting in your car as opposed to a sat phone which is similar to an ordinary mobile.
AnswerID: 250590

Follow Up By: The Landy - Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:38

Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:38
Hi Aandy

Fortunately we have only had to use the HF for a chat, however we have never had a problem making contact with either VKS or Radtel. Both these organisations provide Selcall numbers for emergency services etc.

Whilst you could always ring the same emergency organisations (police etc) via a Satphone the communication is restricted to only those you are trying to contact....a HF communication will potentially be heard by any number of people who may also be in a position to help.

Not trying to convert you here mind you...both have there place.
0
FollowupID: 511814

Follow Up By: ddr - Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:12

Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:12
Recently whilst touring the Eyre Peninsula, dad was listening in on one of the VKS channels where someone was in the outback & needed medical attention. VKS facilitated the best route for the convoy out of where they were (I cant remember where) due to road closures etc from very recent rains. Calling Police or ambulance wasn't necessary by the sounds of the conversation & a phone call to either couldn't have given them the up to date track conditions on how to get out of the predicament they were in, which VKS did due to others being in the vicinity & traveled those tracks only days earlier.

After listening in on this day it convinced me to get a HF unit soon after. No point calling out all engines for a medium/minor ailment when all you really need is the easiest way out from where you are. Police & Ambulance wont necessarily be able to tell you that.
0
FollowupID: 511819

Reply By: SteveL - Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:39

Tuesday, Jul 03, 2007 at 22:39
If you want to buy new then an Icom IC-F7000 and a multi tap whip is probably the best value for money.The Icom has a built-in pre-amp,so it works well with the whip.The Codans use on a preamp in the auto tune antenna and don't work as well with a tapped whip.
AnswerID: 250623

Reply By: Member - lyndon K (SA) - Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 21:03

Wednesday, Jul 04, 2007 at 21:03
ERR, had a few beers :)), from my brief flying days VHF i usually used in planes. Go HF.
How much you spend will reflect on how easy it is to use, ie a cheap one will do the job in an emergency(you just may have to climb a tree to mount the aerial)
Cheers Lyndon
Now is the only time you own
Decide now what you will,
Place faith not in tomorrow
For the clock may then be still

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 250815

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)