reverse snorkle intake
Submitted: Tuesday, Jul 10, 2007 at 22:04
ThreadID:
47599
Views:
2567
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
24
This Thread has been Archived
Gary
Can anyone help me with an answer to this question?
I was travelling
home from work in
Canberra and a Patrol (I think) passed me and had the intake of the snorkle pointing to the rear. I do not know if it was a local or someone passing thru on their way
home from the snow. Can anyone give me an explanation for this? Maybe the owner will see this post. Is it a cold air thing, if it is, for those based in the cooler climes is it something we should be trying?
Your
views would be appreciated.
I am also the owner of an new explorist 600 (50th presssie from the wife and my mates) I am coming to grips with it but if there is anyone in
Canberra area who is
well versed with them and who wouldn't contacting me to give me some tuition on getting the most out of it, would be appreciated e.g. downloading waypoints from explore oz
treks etc. Am doing the Flinders in Feb/Mar 08.
I am not a regular poster to the
forum but I do find a lot of invaluable tips and suggestions contained within the postings. Their is a lot of knowledge ot there.
Reply By: Member - Bucky (VIC) - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:50
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:50
The motor is still going o suck in the air it needs to function. No matter if it is facing forward or backwards.
Excessive dust or heavy rain will not be induced into the engine, if facing backwards
I'm nor too sure about the " Ram " effect being negated by spinning the head backwards, I will leave that to the experts, but I do know that the Genuine
Snorkel, fitted to my Navara, has a real tight restriction type of " goose-neck " ,, that one puzzles me and I have wondered if I modified it a little to remove that goose-neck, what would it do to my air intake sensor ,,because it confuses my logic just a little
Any comments from people that have done this would be greatly appreciated !
Cheers
Bucky
AnswerID:
251833
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:33
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:33
Nearly had a magpie neck in last week rather than any goose-neck! One decided to commit hari-kari and Heather extracted it when I stopped.
FollowupID:
512912
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:30
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:30
The ram effect. one of the comp dudes gained many KW of power without a head on his
snorkel at all on a dyno but that is also standing still which is different again.
most comp trucks now have snorkels facing backwards with no head at all..
FollowupID:
512943
Reply By: Voxson - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:08
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:08
I have a standard "NISSAN"
snorkel which is very similar or maybe even the same as an "AIRTEC" which TJM flog.....
These snorkels are crap design...(in my opinion)........
Cant spin the head backward because it hits on the "A" pillar when it gets to about 40degrees turned....
All the water "rain" seems to find its way to the air filter and is quite often an internal mudpit...
When i am driving on dusty roads which are busy i have to take the head off....
My next
snorkel will be a "SAFARI" for all the obvious reasons...
On my GQ i cut out a little square of flywire and put it in behind the front cover and it worked a treat for insects also...On a Safari that was...
AnswerID:
251980
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:12
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:12
and you cant run a donaldson on top of those airteks either.
FollowupID:
513043
Follow Up By: Voxson - Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:56
Wednesday, Jul 11, 2007 at 22:56
A Donaldson will be my next purchase when i get a real
snorkel..
FollowupID:
513050
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 15:34
Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 15:34
Finally got my Auto gear coming :) Dude did a manual conversion to a 4.5 petrol.. I got everything !!!! Cheaper than the $~7k quoted too!
FollowupID:
513288
Follow Up By: Voxson - Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 17:09
Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 17:09
Mate, if an auto conversion was $10k,,, i rekon i would part with the money...
Who in their right mind would convert a 4.5 over to a manual?
FollowupID:
513306
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 17:10
Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 17:10
easy to say if you have the 10k layin round :(
the bloke did the conversion on a high HP Turboed 4.5.... but I wonder how long the clutch will last!
FollowupID:
513307
Follow Up By: Voxson - Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 21:44
Friday, Jul 13, 2007 at 21:44
hmmm,,,i still rekon an auto behind power is the go..
But call me new fashioned...
Clutch,,,, well,,,, he had better have a change over ready...lol....
If i could put an auto in my ST1300A i would,,,, but having said that,,, the FJR1300AS is pretty close to auto.....
FollowupID:
513368