Saturday, Jul 21, 2007 at 20:09
Ian, after a very quick look at available info, I have no reason to doubt that what you say is true, though I can find only broad, not specific references to it. In any case, I am swayed by the fact that American technology on this sort of stuff is expected to be more advanced than Chinese.
From my look though, I wonder what (if any) the practical advantages are to people who use AGMs for vehicle and
camping type applications.
On a Lifeline web site, when they describe the low internal resistance and high charge capabilities of their AGMs, they say that owners of high output alternators will get the advantage of this. They don't state what they regard as a high output alternator, but other sites (while not giving a definition) seem to talk about 80 Amp and above as being high output. My (and I suspect most other) 4WDs, have an alternator rated below that level. When not charging in the vehicle, most of us charge with solar or multi stage chargers via a generator (or 240 V when available). Neither generate anything close to 80 Amps in a practical situation.
I found reference to AGMs accepting charge of 75% or more of their rated AH capacity. A 120 AH AGM (pretty common), would accept 90 Amps. My 210 AH (90 + 120) in the Hilux could accept 157 Amps. Both way beyond the capacity of any standard alternator, and
well beyond the capability of battery wiring most use (6B&S and 50 Amp Anderson plug). In my case I use 25mm sq cable and 175Amp Anderson plug, but that is pretty rare.
Further I have read on a number of sites, that while AGMs can accept a very high charge current, in the interest of longevity of the battery, 'normal' charging should be at no more than 25% of the battery bank AH capacity (one site quotes 30%). So in my case, maximum 'normal' charge current should be not more than about 50 Amps.
I am simply stating what I have read. Nothing from personal detailed knowledge. While my first trade was Electronics Technician (4 year Army apprenticeship), that was many years before AGM technology came into common use. I therefore claim a 'general' knowledge of this sort of stuff and the ability to broadly understand new stuff that is presented to me - but no more.
So, while I am not disputing what you have said about American AGMs and their ability to accept higher charge currents when available, I am questioning the benefit it provides to the normal user who visits this site. In a military application, for which these batteries were developed (batteries in a
tank for example) it might be quite different.
Not looking for a dispute on this. Just to get an understanding of the practical application of the new information (to me) you have presented on the
forum.
Norm C
FollowupID:
514818