Camp Mattresses - again!
Submitted: Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 20:43
ThreadID:
48646
Views:
2883
Replies:
7
FollowUps:
1
This Thread has been Archived
JohnYW
Dear all,
I have read most of the archive posts I could find on this subject. I have come to the conclusion that most people believe either Coleman or Thermarest are the best. For my situation, I think the thermarest might be the best because of size and have found a source to look at in
my home town.
My question then is for those owners of thermarests - I am looking at a couple of 35mm self inflating mats at 510mm each for width. I am limited to a length of 1810mm and width of 1130mm - does anyone who uses these ever get acking legs? - its just they seem very thin and soft.
We currently have what I can only imagine to be ordinary foam at about that thickness and it doesnt take very long to get aches in the legs / thighs.
Any experience you can share with me will be greatly appreciated.
John
Reply By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 20:58
Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 20:58
John ,
In June I spent 15 nights on a thin 1.5 cm half body length Thermarest and we were
camping on rock shelves .
I was quite comfortable , so with the thicker longer jobbies you should be in heaven . You can get them up to 7.5 cm thick and they are really comfortable .
Willie .
PS Trick is , don't overfill them .
AnswerID:
256972
Reply By: Robin Miller - Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 22:05
Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 22:05
No way would I be happy with a 35mm unit John.
My type , an Australian made Nomad type is 100mm thick.
Alas to my knowledge its not available anymore.
Was looking at an 80mm thick thermarest today at Anaconda, it seemed reasonable.
Agree that correct inflation helps a lot in getting most out of any unit.
Robin Miller
AnswerID:
256982
Follow Up By: Member - MUZBRY (VIC) - Monday, Aug 13, 2007 at 09:22
Monday, Aug 13, 2007 at 09:22
Gday Robin
Let me know what the new one is like, I may have to invest in one before to long as being " old" everything hurts until the sun comes up....
FollowupID:
518161
Reply By: MEMBER - Darian (SA) - Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 22:15
Sunday, Aug 12, 2007 at 22:15
We have 2 x Thermarest brand mattresses - 1.5 inches (37mm) nominal thickness. Top quality product - have used them a lot in the past. Though not in a the same league as your bed at home of course, they are surprisingly comfortable - couldn't see it myself, but other users assured me they would be fine - that's how it turned out. The sales person told me that Thermarest recommend the 2" model for sleeping on frozen ground ! - said that the 2" is no more comfortable than the cheaper 1.5" model - probably true, because even though I'm a buffalo, I don't bottom out on 1.5"......... we let them relax for awhile to fully auto-fill ......then blow a couple of psi in to top them up. Bought ours many years back for about $135 each - the competition now may be just as good, and cheaper.
AnswerID:
256984
Reply By: Crackles - Monday, Aug 13, 2007 at 19:35
Monday, Aug 13, 2007 at 19:35
John I'd buy the Coleman in preferance to the Thermarest as there would be little or no difference in the quality yet Thermorest are considerably dearer. (Paying for the name) Colemans 2 brass valves are are bigger in diameter making them quicker to roll up.
The 35mm Thermorests are probably just a little thin, your hips digging in when sleeping on your side. The Coleman Procore mat is nearly twice as thick (for less money) & certainly more comfortable. You'd have to buy a Thermorest model
well over $200 to match it.
Check the
Freedom Camping site for a couple of quality mats that are available. Prices there are a bit steep particually for the Coleman stuff as they can be sourced from Rays
camping for $120 at times.
Cheers Craig.............
AnswerID:
257112
Reply By: JohnYW - Tuesday, Aug 14, 2007 at 21:51
Tuesday, Aug 14, 2007 at 21:51
Thanks to all who replied. To explain a little more as to why a thicker one is not really an option and, trust me, I have it fixed in my mind that thicker IS better...but I own a 2002 Troopy with a roof conversion which is where the main sleeping is. The roof hinges up from the front of the vehicle so the length is limited by the sleeping boards but further, because of the hinged roof and this is where the feet go, any additional height over about 30-40cm restricts the feet as they are now rubbing on the roof at that end. A 10cm mat would certainly restrict my 6 foot frame from stretching right out! Also there is the problem in this vehicle of where to stow it during the day. Two small thermarests would be less of a problem here.
So ..next step will be to see if my friendly
camping shop will loan me one their 3.5cm thermarest matteresses to try. Stay posted as I will let you know how I get on. With any luck they might let me try a Coleman as
well :-)
Again - thanks for the replies.
John
AnswerID:
257286
Reply By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Aug 17, 2007 at 00:02
Friday, Aug 17, 2007 at 00:02
Try an Exped mat instead.
Their Deluxe one is 10cm thick inflated, and has velcro bonded down the side to join two to make a double.
This was our alternative (at higher cost) to the 4wd double selfinflating matresses from disposals stores. I'm not suggesting they are a bad product, but they are far too big when rolled up.
These are great. Not much bigger when rolled up than my 25mmm & 35(ish)mm Thermarests.
Very comfortable, and about 2 metres long if you are tall.
Bogong Jack in the
Melbourne CBD have them. Not sure who else.
Dave
AnswerID:
257600
Reply By: madcow - Friday, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:38
Friday, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:38
We have recently purchased 2 Coleman mats BUT I would seriously consider the mats available from Freedon
Camping. The foam inner is fixed to the outer and there is no movement between the two. Still happy with the Coleman mats though
AnswerID:
257608